Literature DB >> 3088841

Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy by primary care physicians. Effectiveness and costs in patients negative for fecal occult blood.

M C Rumans, K G Benner, E B Keeffe, J M Custis, D R Lockwood, G E Craner.   

Abstract

A total of 252 consecutive screening flexible sigmoidoscopies were done by two community-based general internists on asymptomatic patients with stool negative for occult blood. Neoplastic lesions were found in 26 patients (10.3%), including 27 adenomatous polyps, 2 with carcinoma-in-situ and 1 carcinoid tumor. No complications resulted from flexible sigmoidoscopy. Nineteen patients with positive screening sigmoidoscopy underwent colonoscopy, and additional adenomatous polyps were found in six patients (31.6%), but no additional malignancy. Total cost for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy and additional studies was $30,359 ($1,168 per patient with a polyp or malignancy and $10,119 per patient with a malignant lesion). Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy can be safely done by community-based general internists in asymptomatic patients with a diagnostic yield comparable with that reported by subspecialists; total costs are acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3088841      PMCID: PMC1306784     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  12 in total

1.  Changes in site distribution of colorectal carcinoma in Connecticut, 1940-1973.

Authors:  D N Snyder; J F Heston; J W Meigs; J T Flannery
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1977-09

2.  Proctosigmoidoscopy and polypectomy in reducing the incidence of rectal cancer.

Authors:  V A Gilbertsen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Sigmoidoscopy in detection and diagnosis in the asymptomatic individual.

Authors:  R J Bolt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The benefits of systematic fiberoptic flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  G W Yarborough; B A Waisbren
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-01

5.  Continued assessment of flexible sigmoidoscopy in a family practice residency.

Authors:  R A Johnson; M Quan; W M Rodney
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Screening for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic patients using flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  D C Wherry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Superiority of the flexible to the rigid sigmoidoscope in routine proctosigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  G Winnan; G Berci; J Panish; T M Talbot; B F Overholt; R W McCallum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Changing distribution of primary cancers in the large bowel.

Authors:  J B Rhodes; F F Holmes; G M Clark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Fiberoptic pansigmoidoscopy. An evaluation and comparison with rigid sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  T W Bohlman; R M Katon; G R Lipshutz; M F McCool; F W Smith; C S Melnyk
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Clinical experience with flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

Authors:  C T Meyer; W McBride; R S Goldblatt; J Borak; P Marignani; H R Black; R W McCallum
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct
View more
  3 in total

1.  Training primary care physicians in flexible sigmoidoscopy--performance evaluation of 17,167 procedures.

Authors:  H D Groveman; R A Sanowski; M R Klauber
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-02

2.  Screening for disease in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  H R Kimball
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1988

Review 3.  Flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy. Safe and effective for family practice.

Authors:  J A Moran
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.275

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.