The macroscopic mechanical properties of biological hydrogels are broadly studied and successfully mimicked in synthetic materials, but little is known about the molecular interactions that mediate these properties. Here, we use two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy to study the pH-induced gelation of hyaluronic acid, a ubiquitous biopolymer, which undergoes a transition from a viscous to an elastic state in a narrow pH range around 2.5. We find that the gelation originates from the enhanced formation of strong interchain connections, consisting of a double amide-COOH hydrogen bond and an N-D-COO- hydrogen bond on the adjacent sugars of the hyaluronan disaccharide unit. We confirm the enhanced interchain connectivity in the elastic state by atomic force microscopy imaging.
The macroscopic mechanical properties of biological hydrogels are broadly studied and successfully mimicked in synthetic materials, but little is known about the molecular interactions that mediate these properties. Here, we use two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy to study the pH-induced gelation of hyaluronic acid, a ubiquitous biopolymer, which undergoes a transition from a viscous to an elastic state in a narrow pH range around 2.5. We find that the gelation originates from the enhanced formation of strong interchain connections, consisting of a double amide-COOHhydrogen bond and an N-D-COO-hydrogen bond on the adjacent sugars of the hyaluronan disaccharide unit. We confirm the enhanced interchain connectivity in the elastic state by atomic force microscopy imaging.
Hydrogels regulate
the mechanical properties of cells and tissues
and thereby play an important role in many biological and pathophysiological
processes, ranging from stem cell differentiation and the degradation
of aging cartilage to wound healing.[1−6] An important feature of natural hydrogels is their ability to tune
their viscoelastic properties in response to environmental stimuli,
such as the solution pH, temperature, and salt conditions. Up to now,
it has been difficult to connect the macroscopic response of hydrogels
to the underlying molecular interactions, e.g., hydrogen-bond and
hydrophobic interactions, thus limiting the capability to predict
and tune the properties of hydrogels.One of the few techniques
able to track interactions at the molecular
scale is two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy (2D-IR).[7] 2D-IR shares with two-dimensional nuclear magnetic
resonance the ability to resolve molecular couplings anddynamics,
but 2D-IR can resolve these interactions at a much shorter time scale.
Molecular interactions such as hydrogen bonds or electrostatic forces
usually change on a time scale of picoseconds, and with 2D-IR, snapshots
of these interactions can be taken with femtosecond time resolution.[8]Here, we use 2D-IR to identify the molecular
interactions that
drive the pH-triggered gelation of hyaluronic acid (HA), a natural
polyelectrolyte that has received widespread attention, being one
of the main components of the extracellular matrix. It is important
for cell–cell communication and also plays an important role
in many biological processes, such as joint lubrication, skin hydration,
and cell migration,[9] whereas its dysregulation
contributes to cancerdevelopment.[10] Due
to its biocompatibility, hyaluronic acid is also widely used as a
scaffold for cell culture anddrug delivery.[11−15] Hyaluronic acid is a paradigmatic example of a responsive
natural hydrogel: it displays a sharp transition in mechanical behavior
at pH 2.5, switching from a viscous state to an elastic gel, denoted
as the “putty state”.[16] The
mechanism underlying this remarkable liquid-to-gel transition has
been investigated for over almost a century with macroscopic techniques
that map the dependence of the viscoelastic properties on pH, temperature,
and ionic strength.[17−19] Based on these studies, it has been proposed that
at pH = 2.5, the net charge of the polyelectrolyte chains may be sufficiently
suppressed to enable the formation of interchain hydrogen-bond interactions
that would act as crosslinks.[20−26] This principle was suggested to be applicable to the wider class
of polysaccharides,[27] but there has been
no direct evidence for this putative pH-triggeredhydrogen-bonding
mechanism.
Experimental Section
Sample Preparation
The samples were
prepared in a glass
vial by adding water (or heavy water), NaCl (0.15 M), andHCl (or
DCl) to achieve different molarities ranging from 0 to 80 mM of acid.
All of these chemicals were provided by Sigma Aldrich. A specific
amount of hyaluronic acid sodium salt in powder form from Streptococcus equi bacteria from Sigma Aldrich (1.5−1.8
> 1 MDa), or from Lifecore Biomedical (Mw ∼ 150 kDa), was added to the solution to reach a final concentration
ranging from 10 to 20 mg/mL. The samples were left to equilibrate
at room temperature for at least 24 h before measuring. Samples were
stored for at most 1 week at a temperature of 4 °C, to slow down
the hydrolytic degradation process.
Rheology
Rheology
measurements were performed with
a stress-controlled rheometer (Anton Paar MCR 501), equipped with
stainless steel parallel plates with a diameter of 40 mm. The experiments
were performed at a gap size of 100 μm and at a temperature
of 22 °C set by a Peltier system. Samples left to equilibrate
for 1 week to reach homogeneity were loaded on the plate using a spatula.
After thermal equilibration, the elastic and viscous shear moduli
were probed by performing oscillatory shear measurements at an oscillation
frequency of 0.5 Hz and a strain amplitude of 0.5%, which is well
within the linear viscoelastic regime for hyaluronan. The reported
results are averages of at least three measurements for each pH. For
each sample, the pH was measured using a pH meter (Hanna Instruments).
Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR)
All linear absorption
measurements were performed using a Bruker Vertex 80v FTIR spectrometer,
equipped with a liquid-nitrogen-cooledmercury cadmium telluride (MCT)
detector. The spectra were recorded under a nitrogen atmosphere at
a wavelength resolution of 3 cm–1. For every spectrum,
100 scans were averaged. In all measurements, a standard sample cell
with a path length of 100 or 75 μm was used. The reported spectra
were corrected for the absorption of the solvent background.
2D-IR
In 2D-IR experiments, we performed one-color
experiments by pumping and probing around 1680 cm–1 and two-color experiments by pumping at 1680 cm–1 and probing at 1450 cm–1. The home-built setup
that we use has been described before.[28] The excitation was performed with a pair of femtosecond mid-infrared
pulses. This excitation pulse pair induced transient absorption changes,
which were monitored by a probe pulse that was delayed by a time Tw. After transmission through the sample, the
probe pulse was sent into an infrared spectrograph anddetected with
an infraredmercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector array, thus yielding
the transient absorption spectrum as a function of the probe frequency.
The dependence of the transient absorption spectrum on the excitation
frequency was determined by measuring transient spectra for many different
delay times between the two excitation pulses. By Fourier transformation
of these spectra, we obtained the dependence of the transient absorption
spectrum on the excitation frequency. By plotting the transient absorption
spectrum as a function of the excitation and the probing frequency,
we obtained a two-dimensional infrared (2D-IR) transient absorption
spectrum for each delay time Tw.
Atomic
Force Microscopy (AFM) Imaging
For AFM measurements,
freshly cleavedmica was briefly rinsed with 0.15 M NaCl before sample
deposition. Then, 50 μL of 100 mg/L HA solution were deposited and left to adsorb
for 15 min. The mica was then rinsed with ultrapure water anddried
at room temperature. Imaging was performed using tapping mode in air
with a TAP150 cantilever on a Veeco Dimension 3100 AFM. The scanning
rate was set to 0.5 Hz, with a scan resolution of 512 × 512.
To retrieve the filament height values, the AFM height images were
processed using the open-source software Gwyddion[29] to correct for a tilt in the image, and the transversal
profiles corresponding to the filament cross section were taken. Using
a custom script on MATLAB, each profile was corrected for the background
noise, and the values of all local maxima were pooled together to
obtain a height distribution for each condition tested.
Results
Rheology
and Infrared Spectroscopy
Hyaluronic acidhas a relatively simple linear structure and homogeneous composition
with repeating disaccharides composed of N-acetyl-glucosamine
andglucuronic acid (illustrated in the inset of Figure b). The pH-dependent viscoelastic
behavior of hyaluronic acid solutions stands out clearly in tube inversion
assays, as shown in Figure a. Whereas the sample prepared in a solution state (“s”)
at pH 1.6 readily flows, the sample prepared in the putty state (“p”)
at pH 2.5 only flows on a time scale of minutes. This large difference
in time scales originates from a pH-triggered transition in rheological
properties from liquid to gel. To study the pH dependence of this
transition in quantitative detail, we performed rheological experiments
on semidilute solutions of high and low molecular weight hyaluronic
acid. We studied solutions in heavy water (D2O), since
heavy water is used as a solvent in 2D-IR studies of the amide and
carbonyl vibrations. 2D-IR cannot be applied to solutions in H2O, as the amide and carbonyl vibrations of hyaluronic acid
absorb in the same infrared frequency region as the bending vibration
of H2O (between 1600 and 1700 cm–1).
In all experiments, the pD values are converted to pH values[30] (see Supporting Information (SI) Appendix). Figure b shows that the elastic and the viscous moduli sharply increase
in a narrow range around a pH of 2.5, revealing a liquid–gel
transition. This transition occurs at a pH value just below the pKa, which is about 2.9.[12,18,25] We find a quantitatively similar pH dependence
of the viscous and elastic moduli for hyaluronan solutions in H2O (see Supporting Information Appendix, Figure S2), which shows that the isotope composition of the
solvent has a negligible effect on the mechanical properties.
Figure 1
Hyaluronic
acid solutions undergo a sol–gel transition in
a narrow pH range. (a) A tube inversion assay shows that hyaluronic
acid solutions prepared at pH 1.6 exhibit viscous flow (s), whereas
solutions prepared at pH 2.5 form a viscoelastic gel (p) that flows
only on time scales beyond 2 min. (b) The pH dependence of the viscous
and elastic modulus of hyaluronic acid in heavy water solutions. We
observe a sharp peak in the elastic shear modulus at pH 2.5. The inset
shows that hyaluronic acid is a polymer of disaccharides, themselves
composed of d-glucuronic acid and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine. (c) Linear infrared spectra for hyaluronic acid
solutions in D2O at pH values ranging between 1.6 and 7.
The infrared spectrum at pH = 2.5 is represented by the thick solid
line. Between 1550 and 1760 cm–1, we observe three
bands: the antisymmetric stretching mode of the carboxylate anion
group, νant,COO–, at 1607 cm–1, the amide I vibration, νAM.I, at
1633 cm–1, and the carboxylic acid stretching mode,
νCOOD, at 1726 cm–1. The inset
shows the fractions of COO– and COOD groups determined
from the IR spectra as a function of pH. Thick lines represent the
expected fractions based on acid–base equilibrium equations
(Supporting Information), assuming a pKa = 2.9. We find good agreement between the
measured and expected carboxylic and carboxylate fractions, with about
25% deprotonation of the carboxyl groups at pH = 2.5.
Hyaluronic
acid solutions undergo a sol–gel transition in
a narrow pH range. (a) A tube inversion assay shows that hyaluronic
acid solutions prepared at pH 1.6 exhibit viscous flow (s), whereas
solutions prepared at pH 2.5 form a viscoelastic gel (p) that flows
only on time scales beyond 2 min. (b) The pH dependence of the viscous
and elastic modulus of hyaluronic acid in heavy water solutions. We
observe a sharp peak in the elastic shear modulus at pH 2.5. The inset
shows that hyaluronic acid is a polymer of disaccharides, themselves
composed of d-glucuronic acid andN-acetyl-d-glucosamine. (c) Linear infrared spectra for hyaluronic acid
solutions in D2O at pH values ranging between 1.6 and 7.
The infrared spectrum at pH = 2.5 is represented by the thick solid
line. Between 1550 and 1760 cm–1, we observe three
bands: the antisymmetric stretching mode of the carboxylate anion
group, νant,COO–, at 1607 cm–1, the amide I vibration, νAM.I, at
1633 cm–1, and the carboxylic acid stretching mode,
νCOOD, at 1726 cm–1. The inset
shows the fractions of COO– andCOOD groups determined
from the IR spectra as a function of pH. Thick lines represent the
expected fractions based on acid–base equilibrium equations
(Supporting Information), assuming a pKa = 2.9. We find good agreement between the
measured and expectedcarboxylic andcarboxylate fractions, with about
25% deprotonation of the carboxyl groups at pH = 2.5.We studied the protonation state of hyaluronan
as a function of
pH with linear IR spectroscopy (Figure c). The relative intensities of the carboxylic acid
andcarboxylate anion bands of hyaluronandirectly reflect the protonation
state of hyaluronan. The antisymmetric vibration of the carboxylate
anion, νant,COO–, absorbs at 1607
cm–1, and the amide I band, νAM.I, absorbs at 1633 cm–1. The C=O vibration
of the COOD group, which will be denoted as νCOOD, absorbs around 1726 cm–1. At pH = 2.5, the COO– andCOOD groups are present in a ratio of 1:4 (inset
in Figure c), which
corresponds to a pKa of 2.9, as reported
in the literature.[12]
Two-Dimensional
Infrared Spectroscopy
We use 2D-IR
spectroscopy to study the intermolecular interactions among hyaluronic
acid chains that lead to the sol–gel transition. We excite
the amide and the carboxyl vibrations with a strong femtosecond infrared
pulse pair (∼100 fs, 4 μJ per pulse). This excitation
induces transient absorption changes that are probed with a weaker
(0.35 μJ) single femtosecond probing pulse that is delayed by
a time Tw. The excitation and probe pulses
are centered at 1680 cm–1 with a bandwidth of 200
cm–1. The excitation and probe spectra thus have
sufficient spectral width to cover the ν = 0 to v = 1 transition
(bleach) and the ν = 1 to v = 2 transition (excited state absorption,
or esa) of the νant,COO–, νCOOD, and νAM.I vibrations.Figure a,b compare the 2D-IR
spectra measured for the solution (pH = 1.6) and the putty state (pH
= 2.5), both for Tw = 1.5 ps. Bleaching
(increased transmission) is indicated in blue, whereas increased absorption
(esa) is indicated in red. The bleach of the v = 0 to v = 1 transition
and the esa of νAM.I are centered at 1639 and 1619
cm–1, respectively, along the probe frequency axis,
whereas for νCOOD, these signals are centered at
1731 and 1703 cm–1, respectively (see also Supporting
Information Appendix, Table S2). The bleaching
and esa of the νant,COO– mode are
in the low-frequency wing of the bleaching and esa of the amide I
vibration, and lead to an elongation of the bleaching and the induced
absorption signals to the lower left corner of the 2D-IR spectrum.
We observe additional signals in the off-diagonal regions of the 2D-IR
spectrum, indicating that the carboxyl andamide modes are coupled.
In the upper pump-frequency region, the cross-peak signal represents
the effect of the excitation of the νCOOD vibration
on the spectrum of the νAM.I mode. In the lower pump-frequency
region, the spectral shape of the carboxylic acid vibration is elongated
along the pump axis (Figure S7). This effect
reduces the visibility of the upward cross-peak, which represents
the effect of the excitation of the νAM.I vibration
on the spectrum of the νCOOD vibration. For this
reason, we focus our analysis on the downward cross-peak that represents
the effect of the excitation of the carboxylic acid vibration on the
νAM.I vibration. The excitation of the νCOOD vibration also leads to a cross-peak signal with the amide
II mode (νAM.II) at 1490 cm–1.
This signal results from the excitation of low-frequency modes following
the relaxation of the νCOOD mode. The excitation
of these low-frequency modes affects the absorption spectra of both
the νCOOD and νAM.II modes (see
SI Appendix, Figure S6a,b).
Figure 2
Isotropic two-dimensional
infrared spectra of solutions of hyaluronic
acid in D2O at a concentration of 20 mg/mL in the spectral
region of the carboxylic acid (νCOOD) and the amide
I (νAM.I) vibrations. 2D-IR spectra (a) for the solution
state (pH = 1.6) and (b) for the putty state (pH = 2.5). The corresponding
linear spectra are shown on the right-hand side of the 2D-IR spectra.
The spectra were collected at a delay time Tw of 1.5 ps. The cross-peaks are indicated by the yellow rectangles
and show the presence of vibrational interactions between νAM.I and νCOOD. The thick black lines represent
the integrated pump region used for the fitting. The pump and probe
spectra are centered at 1680 cm–1.
Isotropic two-dimensional
infrared spectra of solutions of hyaluronic
acid in D2O at a concentration of 20 mg/mL in the spectral
region of the carboxylic acid (νCOOD) and the amide
I (νAM.I) vibrations. 2D-IR spectra (a) for the solution
state (pH = 1.6) and (b) for the putty state (pH = 2.5). The corresponding
linear spectra are shown on the right-hand side of the 2D-IR spectra.
The spectra were collected at a delay time Tw of 1.5 ps. The cross-peaks are indicated by the yellow rectangles
and show the presence of vibrational interactions between νAM.I and νCOOD. The thick black lines represent
the integrated pump region used for the fitting. The pump and probe
spectra are centered at 1680 cm–1.To learn more about the mechanism that underlies
the cross-peak
signals of the amide I modes following excitation of the COOD vibration,
we compare the dependence on time delay for the solution and the putty
states (Figure a).
We normalized the transients to the bleaching signal of the carboxylic
acid vibration at early time delay (∼0.2 ps). From ∼1.5
ps on, the decay of the transients is quite similar to that of the
νCOOD–νAM.II cross-peak,
showing a time constant of ∼3 ps. However, the transients of
the νCOOD–νAM.I cross-peak
signals have their maximum at 0.3–0.5 ps, a much earlier delay
time than the one observed for the νCOOD–νAM.II cross-peak (∼1–1.5 ps). In addition, the
transients of the νCOOD–νAM.I cross-peak show an additional faster decay component with a time
constant of ∼0.6 ps. Interestingly, the transient of the νCOOD–νAM.I cross-peaks has a much higher
intensity at early delay times for the putty state than for the solution
state. This observation, together with the dynamics observed for the
νCOOD–νAM.II cross-peak,
indicates that the νCOOD–νAM.I cross-peak signal contains contributions from two distinct mechanisms:
(1) energy transfer from the excitedCOOD vibration to the amide I
vibration; (2) anharmonic coupling to low-frequency modes that affect
the vibrational spectrum of the amide I mode. The relaxation model
corresponding to these two mechanisms is illustrated in Figure b.
Figure 3
a) Decay traces of the
cross-peak in the νAM.I vibrational region for hyaluronic
acid at a concentration of 20
mg/mL in the solution and putty states. The decay traces are normalized
to the carboxylic acid intensity at early time delay. The solid and
dashed black lines are fits to the relaxation model (described in
the Supporting Information), for the putty
and solution states, respectively. The blue lines represent the fast
component: thick and dashed lines correspond, respectively, to the
putty and solution states. The initial amplitude of the fast component
(indicated with cent) is nearly two times
larger in the putty state (cent = 0.13
± 0.01) than in the solution state (cent = 0.077 ± 0.005). The red line represents the contribution
of the slow component, whose initial amplitude cth is similar for the putty and solution states (cthputty ≈ cthsol. = 0.024 ± 0.004). Values reported are the mean
and standard deviation obtained by averaging over three different
independent measurements. (b) Schematic of the relaxation model describing
the cross-peak dynamics. Red and blue lines refer, respectively, to
the slow component (due to thermalization) and fast component (due
to energy transfer) of the cross-peak dynamics. The value shown is
the average with standard deviation for six independent measurements.
a) Decay traces of the
cross-peak in the νAM.I vibrational region for hyaluronic
acid at a concentration of 20
mg/mL in the solution and putty states. The decay traces are normalized
to the carboxylic acid intensity at early time delay. The solid anddashed black lines are fits to the relaxation model (described in
the Supporting Information), for the putty
and solution states, respectively. The blue lines represent the fast
component: thick anddashed lines correspond, respectively, to the
putty and solution states. The initial amplitude of the fast component
(indicated with cent) is nearly two times
larger in the putty state (cent = 0.13
± 0.01) than in the solution state (cent = 0.077 ± 0.005). The red line represents the contribution
of the slow component, whose initial amplitude cth is similar for the putty and solution states (cthputty ≈ cthsol. = 0.024 ± 0.004). Values reported are the mean
and standarddeviation obtained by averaging over three different
independent measurements. (b) Schematic of the relaxation model describing
the cross-peak dynamics. Red and blue lines refer, respectively, to
the slow component (due to thermalization) and fast component (due
to energy transfer) of the cross-peak dynamics. The value shown is
the average with standarddeviation for six independent measurements.The cross-peak signal arising
from the energy transfer rises with
a time constant Tent, representing the
time scale of energy transfer from the excitedCOOD vibration to the
accepting amide I vibration, anddecays with the vibrational lifetime, T1AM.I, of the amide I vibration. This direct
energy transfer does not occur for the amide II mode because there
is a rather large energy difference between the νCOOD and νAM.II vibrations. We extract the value of T1AM.I from the diagonal signal of the amide
I mode in the 2D-IR spectrum. We find that T1AM.I is comparable to the vibrational lifetime of the COOD
vibration: T1AM.I = 0.65 ± 0.1 ps.
The time constants of the second mechanism involving anharmonic coupling
to low-frequency modes can be extracted from a fit to the transient
of the νCOOD–νAM.II cross-peak
(SI Appendix, Figure S6b). We thus fit
the transients of the νCOOD–νAM.I cross-peak to the following expression containing the lifetimes
of the COOD vibration, T1COOD, the amide
I vibration, T1AM.I, and the low-frequency-modes, T1LFMHere, is
the intensity of the cross-peak normalized
to the intensity of the νCOOD vibration at early
time delay, t̅ = 200 fs. The parameters canh and cent represent
the cross-peak amplitudes associated with the anharmonic coupling
anddirect energy transfer mechanisms, respectively. Tent, canh, and cent are the only free parameters. As shown in Figure a, cent is nearly 2-fold larger for the putty state than for
the solution state, whereas canh is comparable
for the two states. For the time constant Tent, we obtain a value of 150 ± 50 fs. The energy transfer to the
amide I mode constitutes an additional channel for vibrational relaxation
of the COOD mode. The fact that we do not observe a significant difference
in T1COOD between the putty and the solution
state indicates that this energy transfer process occurs only for
a minor fraction of the COOD groups. From the values of cent, we estimate this fraction to be 13 ± 2% for
the putty state and 7 ± 2% for the solution state. The time constant Tent also does not change upon the formation
of the putty state, which shows that the efficiency of the energy
transfer remains the same. Hence, upon formation of the putty state
only the number of COOD groups showing energy transfer increases.The ultrafast energy transfer between the C=O vibration
of the COOD group and the amide I vibration of the amide group can
be well explained from the presence of a hydrogen bond between the
COOD and the amide groups.[31] To get more
information on the nature of this hydrogen bond, we compared the intensity
of the νCOOD–νAM.I cross-peak
signal for polarizations of the probing pulse parallel and perpendicular
to the polarization of the excitation pulse. The ratio of these two
signals reveals the relative orientation of the transition dipole
moments of the excited and probed vibrations that form the cross-peak
signal.[32] From the ratio of the signals
at Tw between 0.3 and 1 ps (where the
energy transfer mechanism is predominant), we find that the angle
between the transition dipoles of νCOOD and νAM.I is ∼20° (SI Appendix, Figure S9). As the transition dipole moment of νAM.I is at an angle of 20° relative to the C=O
bond of the amide group,[33] we conclude
that the hydrogen-bond configuration involves a parallel (or anti-parallel)
alignment between the C=O groups of the carboxylic acid andamide, forming two closely spaced intermolecular hydrogen bonds between
the amide andcarboxylic acid groups, i.e., C=O–OD···O=C–ND
and −N–D···O=C–OD···O=C–.
This geometry, in which the amide andcarboxylic acid groups act both
as the hydrogen-bonddonor and acceptor stabilizing the hydrogen-bonded
structure formed by these two molecular groups, constitutes a strong
interchain connection. We conclude that the putty state at pH = 2.5
contains a 2-fold higher density of these strong double hydrogen bonds
than the solution state at pH = 1.6.To study the role of the
COO– groups in the formation
of the putty state, we also measure 2D-IR spectra where we excite
and probe the νant,COO– and the
νAM.I vibrations. Since the absorption bands of these
two vibrations overlap, we subtract the parallel signal from three
times the perpendicular signal. In the resulting difference spectrum,
the diagonal peaks are strongly suppressed since the corresponding
parallel signal is ∼3 times larger than the perpendicular signal.
This procedure is thus ideally suited to reveal the presence of cross-peak
signals of vibrations that are differently oriented. This strategy
has been extensively used in 2D-IR experiments on proteins to resolve
vibrational couplings.[34]Figure a reports the resulting difference
2D-IR spectrum at pH = 2.5 (putty state). On the diagonal, we observe
some residual signal due to orientational relaxation of the COO– andamide molecular groups.[35−37] In addition,
we also see clear off-diagonal signals (indicated by the yellow rectangles).
In Figure b, we plot
the transient absorption spectrum at pH = 2.5 (black circles) obtained
from Figure a by averaging
the signals with pump frequencies between 1600 and 1620 cm–1, corresponding to the excitation of the νant,COO– vibration. The resulting spectrum is compared
with the transient absorption spectrum at pH = 2.9 that is obtained
using the same procedure (SI Appendix, Figure S12). The transient absorption spectrum at pH 2.5 clearly shows
an enhanced absorption signal around the amide I vibrational frequency,
which implies that the excitation of the νant,COO– vibration yields an enhanced response of the
νAM.I vibration at pH = 2.5. This means that in the
putty state (pH = 2.5), the interaction between the COO– andamide molecular groups is enhanced. A similar enhancement is
observed for the other cross-peak signal, i.e., exciting the amide
I vibration and probing the COO– mode (SI Appendix, Figure S11f). Hence, our results show that the
formation of single N–D–COO– hydrogen
bonds is enhanced in the putty state, in addition to the enhanced
presence of double amide–COOHhydrogen bonds in this state.
Figure 4
(a) Difference
2D-IR spectrum for a solution of hyaluronic acid
at pH 2.5 at a concentration of 20 mg/mL. The difference 2D-IR spectrum
was obtained by subtracting the parallel signal from three times the
perpendicular signal. The yellow rectangles indicate the cross-peak
signals of the amide I and COO– modes. (b) Transient
absorption spectra obtained by averaging over the pump-frequency region
between 1600 and 1620 cm–1 at pH 2.5 and 2.9, and
normalized with respect to the pure antisymmetric stretching signal
of the carboxylate anion group (Figures S10 and S11).
(a) Difference
2D-IR spectrum for a solution of hyaluronic acid
at pH 2.5 at a concentration of 20 mg/mL. The difference 2D-IR spectrum
was obtained by subtracting the parallel signal from three times the
perpendicular signal. The yellow rectangles indicate the cross-peak
signals of the amide I andCOO– modes. (b) Transient
absorption spectra obtained by averaging over the pump-frequency region
between 1600 and 1620 cm–1 at pH 2.5 and 2.9, and
normalized with respect to the pure antisymmetric stretching signal
of the carboxylate anion group (Figures S10 and S11).
Atomic Force Spectroscopy
(AFM)
We also perform atomic
force microscopy (AFM) imaging of hyaluronic acid solutions at different
pH values to investigate to what extent the additional hydrogen bonds
in the putty state are formed within or between hyaluronic acid chains
(Figure a,b). At pH
= 7, we mainly observe pearl-necklace conformations: thin chains alternating
with thicker globular configurations. The globular portions are likely
due to the low affinity for mica.[38] At
pH = 2.5, the AFM images clearly show a much larger density of thick
filaments than at pH = 7, indicative of interchain interactions. To
quantify the extent of lateral association of hyaluronan polymers,
we measured the heights of the filaments at pH = 7 and 2.5 (Figure c). At neutral pH,
we find a Gaussian height distribution centered at an average filament
height h0 = 0.37 nm. This value is consistent
with the expected thickness of a single hyaluronan chain.[38] At pH = 2.5, we find a much broader distribution,
and h0 = 0.53 nm, meaning that the filaments
are thicker. Since the length of the filaments at pH = 2.5 is not
changed compared with that at pH = 7, we conclude that this thickening
is mainly due to enhanced interchain interactions that laterally associate
the strands.
Figure 5
On the top, AFM height images of HA filaments at pH 7
and 2.5,
respectively, color coded from 0 nm (dark red) to 1.2 nm (white).
The insets show amplitude images of smaller areas of 500 × 500
nm2, indicated by the arrows. Scale bar: 500 nm. On the
bottom, filament height distributions with Gaussian fits.
On the top, AFM height images of HA filaments at pH 7
and 2.5,
respectively, color coded from 0 nm (dark red) to 1.2 nm (white).
The insets show amplitude images of smaller areas of 500 × 500
nm2, indicated by the arrows. Scale bar: 500 nm. On the
bottom, filament height distributions with Gaussian fits.
Discussion
The two-dimensional infrared
(2D-IR) spectroscopy measurements
show that the remarkable pH-triggered gelation of hyaluronic acid
at pH 2.5 involves the enhanced formation of double hydrogen bonds
between carboxylic acid andamide groups, and of strong single hydrogen
bonds between a carboxylate anion (which is a stronger hydrogen-bond
acceptor) andamide groups. The enhanced formation of hydrogen bonds
is intimately related and even enabled by changes in the structure
and electrostatic interactions of the hyaluronan polymer chains.An important question is why the gelation occurs only in a narrow
pH range. In particular, one may wonder why the gelation does not
occur for a larger pH range below 2.5, as at lower pH, there will
be even more carboxylic acid groups and thus potentially even more
strong double hydrogen bonds with the amide groups located on a different
chain.The answer to this question can be found in the special
structure
of the hyaluronic acid disaccharide unit, which contains a carboxylic
acid group and an amide group on neighboring sugar units (see the
inset of Figure b).
The formation of a double amide–carboxylic acidhydrogen-bond
structure involves a quite strict local positioning of the hyaluronic
acid chains, which prevents the formation of a seconddouble hydrogen-bond
structure at the adjacent saccharide units. Hence, the following mechanistic
picture arises (Figure ): at pH = 2.5, the partial deprotonation of the carboxylic acid
groups allows for a high probability of forming a strong double amide–COOHhydrogen bond (green box) and an adjacent strong N–D–COO– hydrogen bond (orange box), together forming a very
strong interchain connection. In the single N–D–COO– hydrogen bond, the N–D of an amide group acts
as the hydrogen bonddonor and the COO– anion group
as the hydrogen-bond acceptor. For a sufficient length and concentration
of the hyaluronic acid chains, this enhancedhydrogen-bond formation
will yield a long-range connected network that behaves as an elastic
solid, the putty state. This state is not formed at lower pH, because
at these pH values, very few carboxylic acid groups are deprotonated
and the strong double amide–COOHhydrogen bond can only be
combined with a relatively weak single N–D–COOH or single
COOH–amidehydrogen bond on the neighboring sugar units, thus
forming a weaker interchain connection. As a result, fewer interchain
connections are formed (ca. 2-fold less at pH = 1.6), and the overall
connectivity is too low to form an elastic gel. Also, at pH values
above 2.5, the putty state is not formed because a large fraction
of the carboxylic acid groups is deprotonated, which implies that
no double amide–COOHhydrogen bonds can be formed. In addition,
Coulomb repulsion will prevent the formation of N–D···–O–C
hydrogen bonds on neighboring sugar units. As a result, the density
of interchain connections is again too low to allow for gel formation.
Figure 6
Schematic
images showing the transition from a weakly hydrogen-bonded
network of hyaluronan at pH < 2.5 (top left) to a strongly hydrogen-bonded
network at pH = 2.5 (right), to isolated single chains at pH >
2.5
(bottom left). At pH = 2.5, the balance between hydrogen-bond and
Coulomb repulsion interactions is optimal, and allows the formation
of hydrogen bonds between the carboxyl acid and amide groups observed
as the fast time component in the cross-peak dynamics in 2D-IR. Green
shaded squares indicate the formation of hydrogen bonds between amide
and protonated carboxyl groups, whereas orange shaded squares depict
the formation of hydrogen bonds between amide and deprotonated carboxyl
groups.
Schematic
images showing the transition from a weakly hydrogen-bonded
network of hyaluronan at pH < 2.5 (top left) to a strongly hydrogen-bonded
network at pH = 2.5 (right), to isolated single chains at pH >
2.5
(bottom left). At pH = 2.5, the balance between hydrogen-bond andCoulomb repulsion interactions is optimal, and allows the formation
of hydrogen bonds between the carboxyl acid andamide groups observed
as the fast time component in the cross-peak dynamics in 2D-IR. Green
shaded squares indicate the formation of hydrogen bonds between amide
and protonatedcarboxyl groups, whereas orange shaded squares depict
the formation of hydrogen bonds between amide anddeprotonatedcarboxyl
groups.
Conclusions
In summary, we studied
the molecular origin of the putty state
of the biologically important polysaccharidehyaluronic acid, which
undergoes a sol–gel transformation only in a narrow range around
pH = 2.5. Using two-dimensional infrared (2D-IR) spectroscopy, we
find that this remarkable transition is accompanied by the enhanced
formation of strong interchain connections that consist of a strong
double amide–COOHhydrogen bond (green box in Figure ) and a strong N–D–COO– hydrogen bond (orange box in Figure ) on the adjacent sugar groups of the hyaluronandisaccharide unit. These strong collective interchain connections
can only form when the carboxylic acid groups are partially deprotonated,
which explains why the putty state is observed only in a narrow pH
range. The enhanced interchain connectivity in the putty state is
confirmed by AFM measurements that reveal the association of hyaluronan
into thick strands in this state.This study illustrates that
the combination of 2D-IR spectroscopy,
AFM, and rheology constitutes a unique tool to identify the molecular
mechanisms by which hydrogels respond to environmental stimuli. This
combined multiscale approach has great potential to investigate the
molecular origin of the biological functionalities of other natural
polyelectrolytes and to assist in the rational design of supramolecular
biomaterials with life-like functionalities.[14]
Authors: Mary K Cowman; Chiara Spagnoli; Dina Kudasheva; Min Li; Ansil Dyal; Sonoko Kanai; Endre A Balazs Journal: Biophys J Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Heleen V M Kibbelaar; Antoine Deblais; Krassimir P Velikov; Daniel Bonn; Noushine Shahidzadeh Journal: Int J Cosmet Sci Date: 2021-06-19 Impact factor: 2.970