| Literature DB >> 30887200 |
Lorna A Smith1,2, Andrew Melbourne3,4, David Owen3,4, M Jorge Cardoso3,5, Carole H Sudre3,4,5, Therese Tillin6, Magdalena Sokolska7, David Atkinson8, Nish Chaturvedi6, Sebastien Ourselin3, Alun D Hughes6, Frederik Barkhof4,5,9, H R Jäger10,11.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) estimates from arterial spin labelling (ASL) show unexplained variability in older populations. We studied the impact of variation of haematocrit (Hct) on CBF estimates in a tri-ethnic elderly population.Entities:
Keywords: Ageing; Cerebrovascular circulation; Ethnic groups; Haematocrit
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30887200 PMCID: PMC6719435 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06096-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315
Participant characteristics
| Sex | Ethnicity | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| All | Men | Women | White European | South Asian | African Caribbean | |
| Sex, | 493 | 493 (196) | 297 | 196 | 226 (78) | 175 (67) | 92 (51)** |
| Age, years | 493 | 71.6 ± 5.9 | 72.9 ± 5.2 | 69.7 ± 6.4** | 72.1 ± 5.8 | 70.8 ± 5.6** | 72.0 ± 6.7 |
| Diabetes (yes), | 493 | 133 (27) | 80 (27) | 53 (27) | 39 (17) | 65(37) | 29 (32)** |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 486 | 41.7 ± 9.2 | 41.2 ± 8.3 | 42.5 ± 10.3 | 39.2 ± 7.9 | 43.9 ± 8.8** | 43.6 ± 11.0** |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 489 | 27.5 ± 4.2 | 27.1 ± 3.8 | 28.2 ± 4.8** | 27.5 ± 4.1 | 26.4 ± 3.7** | 29.6 ± 4.7** |
| Haematocrit (% ) | 493 | 41.6 ± 3.7 | 43.0 ± 3.5 | 39.5 ± 3.0** | 42.7 ± 3.6 | 40.8 ± 3.7** | 40.7 ± 3.4** |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 492 | 4.7 ± 1.1 | 4.5 ± 1.0 | 5.1 ± 1.1** | 4.8 ± 1.1 | 4.5 ± 1.0** | 4.8 ± 1.1 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 492 | 2.5 ± 0.9 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 2.7 ± 0.9** | 2.6 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 0.9** | 2.5 ± 1.0 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 492 | 1.60 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 0.5* | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.4** | 1.8 ± 0.6** |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 480 | 79.6 ± 8.3 | 79.6 ± 8.4 | 79.4 ± 8.0 | 79.7 ± 8.0 | 78.6 ± 7.8 | 80.9 ± 9.5 |
| Heart rate (min−1) | 481 | 64.1 ± 11.1 | 62.4 ± 10.9 | 66.7 ± 10.9** | 64.5 ± 10.8 | 63.4 ± 11.0 | 64.7 ± 12.1 |
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 480 | 97.0 ± 10.0 | 97.0 ± 10.0 | 96.9 ± 10.0 | 96.7 ± 10.1 | 96.4 ± 9.9 | 98.6 ± 10.0 |
| Anti-hypertensive medications, (yes) | 493 | 283 (57) | 183 (62) | 100 (51)** | 101 (45) | 119 (68)** | 63 (69)** |
| Lipid lowering medications, | 493 | 238 (48) | 138 (47) | 100 (51) | 120 (53) | 64 (37)** | 54 (59) |
Data are mean ± standard deviation or number of observations (n) (%). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to reference (male/white Europeans) by Fisher’s LSD test after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Fig. 1Boxplot showing median, interquartile range, upper and lower adjacent values and outside values for haematocrit (%) by sex and ethnicity. ** = p < 0.01 by two-way analysis of variance followed by Fisher’s least significant difference test
Comparison of cerebral blood flow without correction for individual haematocrit (CBF_fixed) and cerebral blood flow with correction for individual hemtocrit (CBF_Hct) by sex, ethnicity and diabetes diagnosis
| CBF_fixed (mL/100 g/min) | CBF_Hct (mL/100 g/min) | Difference (mL/100 g/min) | Mean difference (%) | Effect size | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean (95% CI) | Mean |
| |||
| All | 493 | 50.1 | ± 7.9 | 48.8 | ± 7.3 | − 1.3 (− 1.5, −1.1) | − 2.6 | < 0.001 | 0.17 | |
| Men | 297 | 50.0 | ± 8.3 | 49.6 | ± 7.6 | − 0.4 (− 0.7, −0.1) | − 0.8 | 0.005 | 0.05 | |
| Women | 196 | 50.2 | ± 7.2 | 47.5 | ± 6.8 | − 2.7 (− 3.0, − 2.4) | − 5.4 | < 0.001 | 0.38 | |
| White European | All | 226 | 51.8 | ± 8.3 | 51.1 | ± 7.5 | − 0.7 (− 1.0, − 0.4) | − 1.4 | < 0.001 | 0.09 |
| Men | 148 | 51.1 | ± 8.6 | 51.1 | ± 7.7 | 0.0 (− 0.5, 0.4) | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.00 | |
| Women | 78 | 53.2 | ± 7.6 | 51.1 | ± 7.0 | − 2.1 (− 2.6, − 1.6) | − 4.0 | < 0.001 | 0.29 | |
| South Asian | All | 175 | 49.1 | ± 7.3 | 47.3 | ± 6.7 | − 1.8 (− 2.2, − 1.4) | − 3.7 | < 0.001 | 0.26 |
| Men | 108 | 49.4 | ± 8.1 | 48.4 | ± 7.3 | − 1.0 (− 1.5, – 0.6) | − 2.0 | < 0.001 | 0.14 | |
| Women | 67 | 48.7 | ± 5.8 | 45.7 | ± 5.0 | − 3.0 (− 3.6, − 2.5) | − 6.2 | < 0.001 | 0.56 | |
| African Caribbean | All | 92 | 47.6 | ± 6.7 | 45.8 | ± 6.3 | − 1.8 (− 2.3, − 1.3) | − 3.8 | < 0.001 | 0.29 |
| Men | 41 | 47.7 | ± 7.0 | 47.4 | ± 6.4 | − 0.3 (− 0.9, 0.3) | − 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.04 | |
| Women | 51 | 47.6 | ± 6.6 | 44.5 | ± 6.0 | − 3.1 (− 3.6,-2.5) | − 6.5 | < 0.001 | 0.48 | |
| Without diabetes | 377 | 50.5 | ± 7.8 | 49.4 | ± 7.2 | − 1.1 (− 1.4,-0.8) | − 2.2 | < 0.001 | 0.15 | |
| With diabetes | 116 | 49.0 | ± 8.3 | 47.2 | ± 7.5 | − 1.8 (− 2.3, − 1.4) | − 3.7 | < 0.001 | 0.23 | |
Data are mean ± standard deviation, except difference (95% confidence interval CI), mean difference (%). p values were calculated using a Student’s t test. Effect size is Cohen’s d
Fig. 2Boxplot showing median, interquartile range, upper and lower adjacent values and outside values for cerebral blood flow without correction for individual haematocrit (CBFfixed) and cerebral blood flow with correction for individual haematocrit (CBFHct) by sex and ethnicity. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01 by two-way analysis of variance followed by Fisher’s least significant difference test
Fig. 3Scatterplots showing the effect of correction for individual haematocrit on the correlation between haematocrit and cortical cerebral blood flow in men and women. Fixed Hct (CBF_fixed) (a); individualised Hct (CBF_Hct) (b)
Fig. 4Kernel density (kdensity) plots of CBF without correction for individual haematocrit (CBFfixed) and CBF with correction for individual haematocrit (CBFHct) by sex and ethnicity
Fig. 5CBF maps overlaid on segmented T1w without and with adjustment for measured haematocrit. The subject was a white European woman with an haematocrit of 37.3%
Fig. 6Boxplot showing median, interquartile range, upper and lower adjacent values and outside values for CBF without correction for individual haematocrit (CBF_fixed) and CBF with correction for individual haematocrit (CBFHct) by diabetes status. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01 by Student’s t test