| Literature DB >> 30886655 |
Sevcan Uğur1, Hasan Fatih Çay2, İlhan Sezer3, Cahit Kaçar3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The length ratio of the index finger (2D) to the ring finger (4D) (2D : 4D ratio) is considered a biomarker of prenatal sex hormone exposure. The 2D : 4D ratio is influenced by prenatal androgen and estrogen levels. Because ankylosing spondylitis (AS) influences men more frequently and severely than women, androgens are proposed to be related to AS pathogenesis. Estrogens have immune-modulating effects and reduce AS disease activity. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between 2D : 4D ratio and AS disease activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30886655 PMCID: PMC6388325 DOI: 10.1155/2019/4612370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Characteristics of the patients with ankylosing spondylitis. ∗p < 0.05.
| Total ( | Women ( | Men ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 41.41 ± 10.40 | 42.72 ± 11.64 | 40.96 ± 9.95 |
|
| Disease durations, years | 12.14 ± 8.26 | 10.19 ± 7.05 | 12.8 ± 8.56 |
|
| Age of disease onset | 29.25 ± 9.73 | 32.52 ± 10.71 | 28.11 ± 9.15∗ |
|
| BASDAI | 2.93 ± 2.12 | 3.79 ± 2.22 | 2.64 ± 2.01∗ |
|
| BASFI | 2.48 ± 2.09 | 2.96 ± 2.27 | 2.31 ± 2.01 |
|
| Right 2D : 4D | 0.987 ± 0.033 | 0.990 ± 0.036 | 0.986 ± 0.032 |
|
| Left 2D : 4D | 0.981 ± 0.02 | 0.987 ± 0.031 | 0.978 ± 0.027 |
|
Special characteristics of the patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
| Total number/percentage | Women number/percentage | Men number/percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Family history | 63/37.7% | 21/48% | 42/33.9% |
| Peripheral joint involvement | 60/35.9% | 17/39.5% | 43/34.7% |
| Uveitis | 26/15.6% | 8/18.6% | 18/14.5% |
| Use of the biological drugs | 111/66.5% | 22/51.2% | 89/71.8% |
The 2D : 4D ratios in patients with active and inactive disease. ∗p < 0.05.
| Right 2D : 4D | Active disease | Inactive disease |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Women ( | 1.002 ± 0.359 ( | 0.980 ± 0.033∗ ( |
|
| Men ( | 0.985 ± 0.032 ( | 0.988 ± 0.032 ( |
|
| Total ( | 0.988 ± 0.033 ( | 0.985 ± 0.033 ( |
|
Figure 1
Figure 2The L-Schober, finger to floor distance, tragus to wall distance, and chest expansion of patients.
| Total ( | Women ( | Men ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L–Schober (cm) | 3.47 ± 1.99 | 4.00 ± 1.71 | 3.28 ± 2.05∗ |
|
| Fingertip to floor distance (cm) | 18.95 ± 15.37 | 13.22 ± 12.66 | 20.94 ± 15.77∗ |
|
| Tragus to wall distance (cm) | 14.6 ± 5.5 | 12.8 ± 3.59 | 15.3 ± 5.9∗ |
|
| Chest expansion (cm) | 2.9 ± 1.7 | 2.78 ± 1.19 | 3.05 ± 1.85 |
|
The correlations of right and left hand 2D : 4D ratio with age onset, L-Schober, finger to floor distance, tragus to wall distance, chest expansion, BASDAI, and BASFI in female patients.
| Right hand 2D : 4D ratio ( | Left hand 2D : 4D ratio ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age onset | ( | ( |
| L-Schober | ( | ( |
| Finger to floor distance | ( | ( |
| Tragus to wall distance | ( | ( |
| Chest expansion | ( | ( |
| BASDAI | ( | ( |
| BASFI | ( | ( |
The correlations of right and left hand 2D : 4D ratio with age onset, L-Schober, finger to floor distance, tragus to wall distance, chest expansion, BASDAI, and BASFI in male patients.
| Right hand 2D : 4D ratio ( | Left hand 2D : 4D ratio ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age onset | ( | ( |
| L-Schober | ( | ( |
| Finger to floor distance | ( | ( |
| Tragus to wall distance | ( | ( |
| Chest expansion | ( | ( |
| BASDAI | ( | ( |
| BASFI | ( | ( |