Vandit Sardana1, Joanna M Burzynski2, Nicholas Stone3, Brad S Weening1, Paul K Zalzal1. 1. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 3. Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a surgical procedure performed on patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Computer assisted navigated high tibial osteotomy (CAN-HTO) may result in improved outcomes for patients undergoing this procedure. METHODS: Retrospective study involving patients undergoing CAN-HTO. RESULTS: Surveyed thirty-three patients. Average follow-up: 2.3 years. 97% patients reported they would have this procedure performed again, if indicated. Re-operation rate: 6.1% and complication rate: 12.1%. Patients had decreased KOOS for symptoms when compared to non-navigation based HTO (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: There may be merit with the use of CAN-HTO, with demonstrated patient-reported benefits at 2-year follow-up.
PURPOSE: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a surgical procedure performed on patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Computer assisted navigated high tibial osteotomy (CAN-HTO) may result in improved outcomes for patients undergoing this procedure. METHODS: Retrospective study involving patients undergoing CAN-HTO. RESULTS: Surveyed thirty-three patients. Average follow-up: 2.3 years. 97% patients reported they would have this procedure performed again, if indicated. Re-operation rate: 6.1% and complication rate: 12.1%. Patients had decreased KOOS for symptoms when compared to non-navigation based HTO (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: There may be merit with the use of CAN-HTO, with demonstrated patient-reported benefits at 2-year follow-up.
Entities:
Keywords:
CAN; HTO; High tibial osteotomy; Navigation