Vandit Sardana1, Joanna Burzynski2, Giles R Scuderi1. 1. Lenox Hill Hospital, 100 East 77th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY, 10075, USA. 2. School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Arthroscopic surgery has become an important and popular orthopedic procedure for numerous joint disorders. Continuous irrigation is performed to replace synovial fluid for optimal joint distension and clear visualization of the synovial cavity. Irrigation solutions may, however, negatively impact articular cartilage and chondrocyte viability. This systematic review aims to compare different irrigating solutions and their properties to determine whether one is superior in its effects on articular cartilage and chondrocytes. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted. The online databases: Embase, Medline, HealthStar, Emcare and PubMed were searched from 1946 to August 2018. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) was used to assess methodological quality of the included studies. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this review. Although the studies used different criteria to define superiority, solution superiority was based on results that focused on articular cartilage and chondrocyte viability. Seven of the sixteen included studies compared Ringer's/lactate solution or Ringer's lactate to normal saline. Three found Ringer's solution or Ringer's lactate to be superior to saline, whereas, three studies found no significant differences and one study found Ringer's lactate to be inferior to saline only when their osmolarities differed. Four studies compared ionic to non-ionic solutions. Two of the four studies demonstrated non-ionic solutions to be superior, one had demonstrated no significant differences between solutions, while one had mixed results. Six of the sixteen included studies compared differing osmolarities. One found no statistically significant differences between solutions of differing osmolarities, whereas, the remaining five studies found superiority with hyperosmolarity. Two of the sixteen included studies examined the effects of different temperatures. Both studies concluded that the use of a warmer (more physiological) temperature is more ideal. Two of the sixteen studies included in this review compared solutions with differing pH levels. Both studies concluded on the importance of utilizing the more physiological solutions for arthroscopic procedures. CONCLUSION: Ringer's Lactate and Ringer's Solution as well as non-ionic solutions may have merit over the use of the normal saline for irrigation. Hyperosmolarity, warmer solutions and ones with more physiological pH values may be beneficial when considering potential effects on articular cartilage and chondrocytes. The current review demonstrated trends found in the current literature, which require human studies - preferably high quality RCTs -to make recommendations that aid surgeons in making the best decision regarding the ideal irrigation solution to use on their patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Systematic review of Level IV studies.
PURPOSE: Arthroscopic surgery has become an important and popular orthopedic procedure for numerous joint disorders. Continuous irrigation is performed to replace synovial fluid for optimal joint distension and clear visualization of the synovial cavity. Irrigation solutions may, however, negatively impact articular cartilage and chondrocyte viability. This systematic review aims to compare different irrigating solutions and their properties to determine whether one is superior in its effects on articular cartilage and chondrocytes. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted. The online databases: Embase, Medline, HealthStar, Emcare and PubMed were searched from 1946 to August 2018. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) was used to assess methodological quality of the included studies. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this review. Although the studies used different criteria to define superiority, solution superiority was based on results that focused on articular cartilage and chondrocyte viability. Seven of the sixteen included studies compared Ringer's/lactate solution or Ringer's lactate to normal saline. Three found Ringer's solution or Ringer's lactate to be superior to saline, whereas, three studies found no significant differences and one study found Ringer's lactate to be inferior to saline only when their osmolarities differed. Four studies compared ionic to non-ionic solutions. Two of the four studies demonstrated non-ionic solutions to be superior, one had demonstrated no significant differences between solutions, while one had mixed results. Six of the sixteen included studies compared differing osmolarities. One found no statistically significant differences between solutions of differing osmolarities, whereas, the remaining five studies found superiority with hyperosmolarity. Two of the sixteen included studies examined the effects of different temperatures. Both studies concluded that the use of a warmer (more physiological) temperature is more ideal. Two of the sixteen studies included in this review compared solutions with differing pH levels. Both studies concluded on the importance of utilizing the more physiological solutions for arthroscopic procedures. CONCLUSION: Ringer's Lactate and Ringer's Solution as well as non-ionic solutions may have merit over the use of the normal saline for irrigation. Hyperosmolarity, warmer solutions and ones with more physiological pH values may be beneficial when considering potential effects on articular cartilage and chondrocytes. The current review demonstrated trends found in the current literature, which require human studies - preferably high quality RCTs -to make recommendations that aid surgeons in making the best decision regarding the ideal irrigation solution to use on their patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Systematic review of Level IV studies.