Literature DB >> 30886100

Biomaterials-aided mandibular reconstruction using in vivo bioreactors.

Alexander M Tatara1,2, Gerry L Koons1,2, Emma Watson1,2, Trenton C Piepergerdes1, Sarita R Shah1,2, Brandon T Smith1,2, Jonathan Shum3, James C Melville3, Issa A Hanna3, Nagi Demian3, Tang Ho4, Anthony Ratcliffe5, Jeroen J J P van den Beucken6, John A Jansen6, Mark E Wong3, Antonios G Mikos7.   

Abstract

Large mandibular defects are clinically challenging to reconstruct due to the complex anatomy of the jaw and the limited availability of appropriate tissue for repair. We envision leveraging current advances in fabrication and biomaterials to create implantable devices that generate bone within the patients themselves suitable for their own specific anatomical pathology. The in vivo bioreactor strategy facilitates the generation of large autologous vascularized bony tissue of customized geometry without the addition of exogenous growth factors or cells. To translate this technology, we investigated its success in reconstructing a mandibular defect of physiologically relevant size in sheep. We fabricated and implanted 3D-printed in vivo bioreactors against rib periosteum and utilized biomaterial-based space maintenance to preserve the native anatomical mandibular structure in the defect site before reconstruction. Nine weeks after bioreactor implantation, the ovine mandibles were repaired with the autologous bony tissue generated from the in vivo bioreactors. We evaluated tissues generated in bioreactors by radiographic, histological, mechanical, and biomolecular assays and repaired mandibles by radiographic and histological assays. Biomaterial-aided mandibular reconstruction was successful in a large superior marginal defect in five of six (83%) sheep. Given that these studies utilized clinically available biomaterials, such as bone cement and ceramic particles, this strategy is designed for rapid human translation to improve outcomes in patients with large mandibular defects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioreactor; bone; craniofacial; in vivo; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30886100      PMCID: PMC6452741          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1819246116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  Localized mandibular infection affects remote in vivo bioreactor bone generation.

Authors:  Emma Watson; Brandon T Smith; Mollie M Smoak; Alexander M Tatara; Sarita R Shah; Hannah A Pearce; Katie J Hogan; Jonathan Shum; James C Melville; Issa A Hanna; Nagi Demian; Joseph C Wenke; George N Bennett; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; John A Jansen; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  An Ovine Model of In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation.

Authors:  Emma Watson; Alexander M Tatara; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; John A Jansen; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  A hierarchical vascularized engineered bone inspired by intramembranous ossification for mandibular regeneration.

Authors:  Xin Ye; Jianxiang He; Shaolong Wang; Qianglong Han; Dongqi You; Bin Feng; Feiya Zhao; Jun Yin; Mengfei Yu; Huiming Wang; Huayong Yang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 24.897

4.  Biomaterial design strategies to address obstacles in craniomaxillofacial bone repair.

Authors:  Marley J Dewey; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 5.  [Research progress of in vivo bioreactor for bone tissue engineering].

Authors:  Jian Wang; Xiao Wang; Ping Zhen; Bo Fan
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-05-15

Review 6.  Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology-The state of translation.

Authors:  Weston L Niermeyer; Cole Rodman; Michael M Li; Tendy Chiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-19

7.  Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone Reparative Potential.

Authors:  A G Abu-Shahba; T Wilkman; R Kornilov; M Adam; K M Salla; J Lindén; A K Lappalainen; R Björkstrand; R Seppänen-Kaijansinkko; B Mannerström
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Dual-functional porous and cisplatin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement for reconstruction of load-bearing bone defect kills bone tumor cells.

Authors:  Zhule Wang; Liebert Parreiras Nogueira; Håvard Jostein Haugen; Ingrid Cm Van Der Geest; Patricia Caetano de Almeida Rodrigues; Dennis Janssen; Thom Bitter; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; Sander Cg Leeuwenburgh
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-29

Review 9.  An overview of de novo bone generation in animal models.

Authors:  Takashi Taguchi; Mandi J Lopez
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  BMP-2 Long-Term Stimulation of Human Pre-Osteoblasts Induces Osteogenic Differentiation and Promotes Transdifferentiation and Bone Remodeling Processes.

Authors:  Lena-Christin Ingwersen; Marcus Frank; Hendrik Naujokat; Klaas Loger; Rainer Bader; Anika Jonitz-Heincke
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.