Literature DB >> 30885598

Comparable rates of lymph node metastasis and survival between diffuse type and intestinal type early gastric cancer patients: a large population-based study.

Zhi-Yong Li1, Qing-Wei Zhang2, La-Mei Teng3, Chi-Hao Zhang4, Ying Huang5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Limited evidence and contradictory results exist regarding the impact of Lauren type, namely diffuse and intestinal types, of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and prognosis for early gastric cancer (EGC). We aimed to compare LNM and prognosis between diffuse and intestinal type EGCs using comprehensive statistical analysis.
METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify all patients with surgically resected, histologically diagnosed, intestinal or diffuse type EGC. Multivariate logistic regression, multivariate Cox regression, multivariate competing risk model, and propensity score matching were used to analyze association the Lauren type and LNM or prognosis.
RESULTS: We identified 5593 EGCs from the SEER database, including 4376 intestinal types and 1217 diffuse types. No positive association was found between LNM and Lauren type (odds ratio, .93; 95% confidence interval [CI], .70-1.24; P = .62) after adjustment for other risk factors. Moreover, diffuse-type EGCs showed a similar prognosis to intestinal type EGCs in both multivariate Cox regression (HR [hazard ratio], .95; 95% CI, .77-1.18; P = .66) and the multivariate competing risk model (subdistribution HR [SHR], .99; 95% CI, .80-1.22; P = .926). Propensity score matching was used, and 733 diffuse types were matched with 733 intestinal types. We did not find any association between the Lauren type and LNM (odds ratio, .98; 95% CI, .71-1.37; P = .934) or prognosis in the univariate Cox regression (HR, .98; 95% CI, .76-1.26; P = .893) and univariate competing risk model (SHR, .98; 95% CI, .76-1.26; P = .893).
CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse-type EGC may have a comparable risk of LNM and prognosis to intestinal-type EGC. Nevertheless, these results should be carefully interpreted with caution when choosing endoscopic resection instead of surgery, because the treatment choice for EGC depends on the risk of lymphovascular invasion rather than LNM rate or prognosis.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30885598     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

1.  Identification and Development of Subtypes with Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Based on Both Hypoxia and Immune Cell Infiltration.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Jingjing Sun; Yang Yang; Sonia Zebaze Dongmo; Yeben Qian; Zhen Wang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-12-06

2.  Higher LNM rate and poorer prognosis of early-onset compared to late-onset T1 stage colorectal cancer: a large-population based study.

Authors:  Chao-Tao Tang; Zi-Xiang Guo; Peng Wang; You-Xiang Chen; Chun-Yan Zeng
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Comparable prevalence of distant metastasis and survival of different primary site for LN + pancreatic tumor.

Authors:  Xin Lou; Jun Li; Ya-Qing Wei; Zhi-Jia Jiang; Ming Chen; Jin-Jin Sun
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Prognostic analysis of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study and competing risk analysis.

Authors:  Chao-Tao Tang; Youxiang Chen; Chunyan Zeng
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  A clinical model to predict distant metastasis in patients with superficial gastric cancer with negative lymph node metastasis and a survival analysis for patients with metastasis.

Authors:  Jingyu Chen; Lunpo Wu; Zizhen Zhang; Sheng Zheng; Yifeng Lin; Ning Ding; Jiawei Sun; Liuhong Shi; Meng Xue
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Differential prognostic implications of gastric adenocarcinoma based on Lauren's classification: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-based cohort study.

Authors:  Dehua Tang; Muhan Ni; Hao Zhu; Jun Cao; Lin Zhou; Shanshan Shen; Chunyan Peng; Ying Lv; Guifang Xu; Lei Wang; Xiaoping Zou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

7.  Higher Lymph Node Metastasis Rate and Poorer Prognosis of Intestinal-Type Gastric Cancer Compared to Diffuse-Type Gastric Cancer in Early-Onset Early-Stage Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chao-Tao Tang; Si-Hai Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-23

8.  The Clinicopathological Features and Overall Survival of Patients With Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Yuxin Chu; Qinyong Hu; Qibin Song
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

9.  Prognostic value of lymph node density on cancer staging system for gastric cancer without distal metastasis: a population-based analysis of SEER database.

Authors:  Yuhua Liu; Hao Cui; Xinxin Xu; Wenquan Liang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.253

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.