Prabjit Ajrawat1, Tim Dwyer1, Mahmoud Almasri1, Christian Veillette1, Anthony Romeo2, Timothy Leroux1, John Theodoropoulos1, Aaron Nauth1, Patrick Henry1, Jaskarndip Chahal3. 1. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: jchahal@utosm.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the optimization of biomechanical and patient factors in the setting of rotator cuff repair (RCR), postoperative retear rates remain high in many series reported in the literature. Preclinical studies have suggested bone marrow stimulation (BMS) at the rotator cuff footprint may reduce the rate of retear after RCR. The objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze the clinical evidence investigating the effect of arthroscopic RCR, with and without BMS, on rotator cuff healing and functional outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through December 2017. Two reviewers selected studies based on the inclusion criteria and assessed methodologic quality. Pooled analyses were performed for continuous and binomial variables where appropriate. RESULTS: Four studies (365 patients), including 2 Level I randomized controlled trials and 2 Level III retrospective comparative cohort studies were included. There was no statistical difference in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale score, or the Constant score between the BMS and conventional repair groups. The pooled retear rates were 18.4% (28 of 152) and 31.8% (56 of 176) for patients treated with and without BMS, respectively. The pooled analysis of rotator cuff retear rates from the 4 studies (328 patients) showed a statistically significant difference favoring BMS over conventional repair (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.73; P = .002; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: BMS reduces the retear rate after RCR but shows no difference in functional outcomes compared with conventional repair. This study provides evidence for the use of BMS as a potential cost-effective biological approach toward improving rotator cuff healing.
BACKGROUND: Despite the optimization of biomechanical and patient factors in the setting of rotator cuff repair (RCR), postoperative retear rates remain high in many series reported in the literature. Preclinical studies have suggested bone marrow stimulation (BMS) at the rotator cuff footprint may reduce the rate of retear after RCR. The objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze the clinical evidence investigating the effect of arthroscopic RCR, with and without BMS, on rotator cuff healing and functional outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through December 2017. Two reviewers selected studies based on the inclusion criteria and assessed methodologic quality. Pooled analyses were performed for continuous and binomial variables where appropriate. RESULTS: Four studies (365 patients), including 2 Level I randomized controlled trials and 2 Level III retrospective comparative cohort studies were included. There was no statistical difference in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale score, or the Constant score between the BMS and conventional repair groups. The pooled retear rates were 18.4% (28 of 152) and 31.8% (56 of 176) for patients treated with and without BMS, respectively. The pooled analysis of rotator cuff retear rates from the 4 studies (328 patients) showed a statistically significant difference favoring BMS over conventional repair (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.73; P = .002; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: BMS reduces the retear rate after RCR but shows no difference in functional outcomes compared with conventional repair. This study provides evidence for the use of BMS as a potential cost-effective biological approach toward improving rotator cuff healing.