| Literature DB >> 30885096 |
Qingyang Xu1,2, Fang Bai2, Ning Chen1, Gang Bai2.
Abstract
In this study, waste bacterial cell (WBC) was recovered and used as an alternative to yeast extract in L-tryptophan fermentation. The effects of sulfuric acid concentration and temperature on the hydrolysis of WBC were optimized and the amino acid content in the waste bacterial cell hydrolysate (WBCH) was increased. Plackett-Burman and Box-Behnken design analysis revealed the optimum composition of the WBCH-based fermentation medium to be 22.47 g/L WBCH, 2.26 g/L KH2PO4, and 1.25 mg/L vitamin H. L-tryptophan yield and productivity with WBCH as the nitrogen source were 52.3 g/L and 2.16 g/L/h, respectively, which were 13% and 18% higher than those obtained with the yeast extract as the nitrogen source. In addition, WBCH did not affect the growth of Escherichia coli during L-tryptophan fermentation. Cost accounting showed that WBCH could be used as a novel and cheap organic nitrogen source for industrial L-tryptophan production.Entities:
Keywords: L-tryptophan; acid hydrolysis; fermentation; waste bacterial cell
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30885096 PMCID: PMC6527063 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2019.1586053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Figure 1.Preparation and utilization of WBCH. WBC refers to waste bacterial cell recovered by centrifugation. WBCH refers to waste bacterial hydrolysate produced by acid hydrolysis.
Experimental design for screening of variables using the Plackett-Burman method.
| Trial | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | L-tryptophan yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 7.36 ± 0.06 |
| 2 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 7.95 ± 0.08 |
| 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 8.36 ± 0.06 |
| 4 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 9.13 ± 0.08 |
| 5 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 8.72 ± 0.07 |
| 6 | −1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 6.82 ± 0.06 |
| 7 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9.16 ± 0.07 |
| 8 | 1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 8.24 ± 0.05 |
| 9 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 8.93 ± 0.06 |
| 10 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9.25 ± 0.06 |
| 11 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 9.01 ± 0.08 |
| 12 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 8.18 ± 0.06 |
± represents standard errors of the means.
Experimental results of the path of steepest ascent.
| Trial | WBCH (g/L) | KH2PO4 (g/L) | VH (mg/L) | L-tryptophan yield (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 8.85 ± 0.05 |
| 2 | 22 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 9.32 ± 0.07 |
| 3 | 24 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 9.11 ± 0.06 |
| 4 | 26 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 9.04 ± 0.06 |
| 5 | 28 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 8.76 ± 0.05 |
± represents standard errors of the means.
Optimization of the medium components for improving the L-tryptophan yield using Box-Benhnken design.
| Trial | L-tryptophan yield (g/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 10.22 ± 0.05 |
| 2 | 22 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 11.57 ± 0.05 |
| 3 | 22 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 9.73 ± 0.05 |
| 4 (c) | 22 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 12.50 ± 0.06 |
| 5 | 22 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 10.06 ± 0.05 |
| 6 | 26 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 10.86 ± 0.05 |
| 7 | 22 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 10.92 ± 0.05 |
| 8 | 18 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 9.18 ± 0.05 |
| 9 | 26 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 11.30 ± 0.05 |
| 10 (c) | 22 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 12.32 ± 0.06 |
| 11 | 26 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 11.18 ± 0.05 |
| 12 | 18 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 10.80 ± 0.05 |
| 13 | 18 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 9.13 ± 0.05 |
| 14 (c) | 22 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 12.27 ± 0.06 |
| 15 | 26 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 10.65 ± 0.05 |
± represents standard errors of the means.
Figure 2.Effect of sulfuric acid concentration (a), temperature (b), and reaction duration (c) on WBC hydrolysis. The total amino acid yield is the mass ratio of extracted total amino acid to dry WBC.
Comparison of amino acids in YE, WBC extract, and WBCH.
| Amino acid | Yeast extract/(mg/g)a | WBC extract/(mg/g)b | WBCH/(mg/g)c |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asparagine | 16.10 ± 0.08 | 5.52 ± 0.08 | 0.86 ± 0.02 |
| Tyrosine | 14.20 ± 0.07 | 3.06 ± 0.07 | 0.48 ± 0.03 |
| Histidine | 5.50 ± 0.06 | 28.38 ± 0.15 | 4.43 ± 0.05 |
| Proline | 8.90 ± 0.05 | 2.22 ± 0.06 | 0.35 ± 0.02 |
| Glycine | 11.10 ± 0.10 | 11.58 ± 0.08 | 1.81 ± 0.02 |
| Methionine | 12.00 ± 0.09 | 6.54 ± 0.05 | 1.02 ± 0.02 |
| Phenylalanine | 12.20 ± 0.11 | 5.94 ± 0.06 | 0.93 ± 0.02 |
| Serine | 14.60 ± 0.13 | 2.28 ± 0.08 | 0.36 ± 0.03 |
| Isoleucine | 14.80 ± 0.12 | 3.78 ± 0.03 | 0.59 ± 0.01 |
| Lysine | 15.20 ± 0.11 | 8.94 ± 0.06 | 1.40 ± 0.03 |
| Threonine | 15.09 ± 0.14 | 10.02 ± 0.08 | 1.57 ± 0.02 |
| Arginine | 21.00 ± 0.16 | 3.18 ± 0.05 | 0.50 ± 0.03 |
| Valine | 22.10 ± 0.16 | 10.62 ± 0.09 | 1.66 ± 0.04 |
| Leucine | 30.60 ± 0.18 | 9.72 ± 0.06 | 1.52 ± 0.03 |
| Alanine | 41.10 ± 0.12 | 14.1 ± 0.06 | 2.20 ± 0.05 |
| Glutamic | 58.20 ± 0.15 | 19.44 ± 0.12 | 3.04 ± 0.06 |
aMass ratio of extracted total amino acids to dry yeast cell.
bMass ratio of extracted total amino acids to dry WBC.
cMass ratio of extracted total amino acids to WBCH.
± represents standard errors of the means.
F-test and significance levels calculated from Plackett-Burman experiments.
| Trial | Factors | Level | Pr > F | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (−1) High (+1) | ||||||
| A | (NH4)2SO4 | 4 | 5 | 0.17 | 0.7052 | NS |
| B | WBCH | 20 | 25 | 29.98 | 0.0054 | * |
| C | Citric acid | 2 | 2.5 | 1.84 | 0.2460 | NS |
| D | KH2PO4 | 2 | 2.5 | 6.51 | 0.0432 | * |
| E | MgSO4·7H2O | 2 | 2.5 | 5.10 | 0.0869 | S |
| F | FeSO4·7H2O | 0.15 | 0.188 | 0.76 | 0.4316 | NS |
| G | VH (mg/L) | 1 | 1.25 | 9.43 | 0.0373 | * |
Variance analysis of regression equation of Box-Benhnken design.
| Factor | Sum of squares | Degree of freedom | Mean square | F value | Pr > F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 16.29 | 9 | 1.81 | 18.76 | 0.0024* |
| X1-WBCH | 2.71 | 1 | 2.71 | 28.15 | 0.0032* |
| X2-KH2PO4 | 0.68 | 1 | 0.68 | 7.10 | 0.0447* |
| X3-VH | 1.73 | 1 | 1.73 | 17.94 | 0.0082* |
| X1X2 | 0.13 | 1 | 0.13 | 1.34 | 0.2987 |
| X1X3 | 1.35 | 1 | 1.35 | 13.95 | 0.0135* |
| X2X3 | 0.026 | 1 | 0.026 | 0.27 | 0.6284 |
| X12 | 4.48 | 1 | 4.48 | 46.47 | 0.0010* |
| X22 | 3.70 | 1 | 3.70 | 38.42 | 0.0016* |
| X32 | 2.94 | 1 | 2.94 | 30.44 | 0.0027* |
| Residual | 0.48 | 5 | 0.096 | ||
| Lack of fit | 0.42 | 3 | 0.14 | 4.41 | 0.1902 (NS) |
| Pure error | 0.063 | 2 | 0.032 | ||
| Total variation | 16.77 | 14 | |||
| Adjustment | |||||
Figure 3.Combined effect of (a) WBCH and KH2PO4 concentration; (b) WBCH and VH concentration; (c) KH2PO4 and VH concentration on L-tryptophan production.
Figure 4.Time courses of (a) biomass formation; (b) specific growth rate; (c) L-tryptophan titer; and (d) L-tryptophan production rate by E. coli using WBCH medium and YE medium.
Calculation of production cost of WBCH.
| Materials | Consumption | Unit price (RMB) | Cost(RMB/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBC | 0.16 (kg) | 2.0 | 0.320 |
| Sulfuric acid | 0.23 (kg) | 0.6 | 0.138 |
| Ammonium hydroxide | 0.06 (kg) | 2.0 | 0.12 |
| Steam (0.8 MPa) | 0.07 (kg) | 0.08 | 0.056 |
| Electricity | 0.04 (KW·h) | 0.8 | 0.032 |
| Total | 0.666 |