BACKGROUND: To overcome the substantial functional loss after calcaneal fractures (CF), surgical treatment currently consists of two strategies, namely the commonly used extended lateral approach (ELA) and the less invasive sinus tarsi approach (STA). Despite the comparable anatomical restoration, the biomechanical and functional outcome of these strategies during early rehabilitation has not yet been investigated. RESEARCH QUESTION: To evaluate changes in gait characteristics and functional development in patients with CF treated by either STA or ELA. METHODS: A total of 56 patients with unilateral CF were included in this retrospective study. 26 patients were treated by ELA while 30 patients underwent surgery through the STA. Functional and biomechanical measurements were performed at follow-up periods of three and six months. Foot and ankle kinetics and kinematics were extracted using instrumented gait analysis with a multi segment foot model. Physical and mental components of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and total scoring of the AOFAS hindfoot scale were used for functional evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney and Student's t-test. Effect sizes of group differences were calculated using Cohen's d. RESULTS: Comparisons between ELA and STA showed no significant difference regarding the biomechanical and functional outcome. Within-group comparisons showed significant (p < 0.05) improvements from three to six month follow-up. Ankle joint and hindfoot kinematics showed increased mobility during walking of up to 34% and 26%, respectively. Maximum ankle joint moment also improved by up to 34% while vertical ground reaction force increased by 8%. Functional outcome only revealed significant changes in the physical component of SF-36. SIGNIFICANCE: ELA and STA treatments revealed comparable functional improvements in patients with unilateral intraarticular calcaneal fractures during early rehabilitation. The less invasive STA provides adequate restoration of dynamic foot function and could serve as a viable alternative to the commonly used ELA.
BACKGROUND: To overcome the substantial functional loss after calcaneal fractures (CF), surgical treatment currently consists of two strategies, namely the commonly used extended lateral approach (ELA) and the less invasive sinus tarsi approach (STA). Despite the comparable anatomical restoration, the biomechanical and functional outcome of these strategies during early rehabilitation has not yet been investigated. RESEARCH QUESTION: To evaluate changes in gait characteristics and functional development in patients with CF treated by either STA or ELA. METHODS: A total of 56 patients with unilateral CF were included in this retrospective study. 26 patients were treated by ELA while 30 patients underwent surgery through the STA. Functional and biomechanical measurements were performed at follow-up periods of three and six months. Foot and ankle kinetics and kinematics were extracted using instrumented gait analysis with a multi segment foot model. Physical and mental components of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and total scoring of the AOFAS hindfoot scale were used for functional evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney and Student's t-test. Effect sizes of group differences were calculated using Cohen's d. RESULTS: Comparisons between ELA and STA showed no significant difference regarding the biomechanical and functional outcome. Within-group comparisons showed significant (p < 0.05) improvements from three to six month follow-up. Ankle joint and hindfoot kinematics showed increased mobility during walking of up to 34% and 26%, respectively. Maximum ankle joint moment also improved by up to 34% while vertical ground reaction force increased by 8%. Functional outcome only revealed significant changes in the physical component of SF-36. SIGNIFICANCE: ELA and STA treatments revealed comparable functional improvements in patients with unilateral intraarticular calcaneal fractures during early rehabilitation. The less invasive STA provides adequate restoration of dynamic foot function and could serve as a viable alternative to the commonly used ELA.