Literature DB >> 30884109

Efficacy and safety of alternative oral administrations of P2Y12-receptor inhibitors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Matteo Serenelli1, Rita Pavasini1, Francesco Vitali1, Elisabetta Tonet1, Ferruccio Bilotta2, Guido Parodi2, Gianluca Campo1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early administration of P2Y12-receptor inhibitors is recommended in all patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management, with the aim to achieve the fastest and most effective platelet inhibition. Several trials investigated alternative methods of P2Y12-receptor inhibitor administration (mainly chewed or crushed) aimed at ensuring faster and higher platelet inhibition. Thus, we decided to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis analyzing efficacy and safety of alternative P2Y12-receptor inhibitor administration strategies.
METHODS: Systematic research was performed on Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Biomed Central, and Web of Science databases. We included randomized or observational trials testing at least one P2Y12-receptor inhibitor alternative administration. The primary outcome of the study was the value of the platelet reactivity unit (PRU) at 1 h after drug administration, assessed by VerifyNow P2Y12 test (Accumetrics, Inc., San Diego, CA). Secondary outcomes were adverse bleeding events (safety outcome). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Fourteen studies were selected for qualitative analysis. Five studies, all focused on ticagrelor, were selected for quantitative efficacy analyses. These five studies compared the administration of crushed/chewed ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose (LD) with the standard whole tablets LD. The pooled mean difference between the two administrations was -59.24 PRU (95% CI from -30.61 to -87.87 PRU) in favor of the crushed/chewed administration, corresponding to a 25% mean relative PRU reduction between alternative and standard P2Y12-receptor inhibitor administrations at 1 h after drug intake. A similar relationship was found in other studies on alternative administration of clopidogrel and prasugrel, not included in the quantitative analysis.
© 2019 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P2Y12; chewed; clopidogrel; crushed; ticagrelor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30884109     DOI: 10.1111/jth.14434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  3 in total

1.  Facilitation Through Aggrastat or Cangrelor Bolus and Infusion Over PrasugreL: a MUlticenter Randomized Open-label Trial in PatientS with ST-elevation Myocardial InFarction Referred for PrimAry PercutaneouS InTERvention (FABOLUS FASTER) Trial: Design and Rationale : The FABOLUS FASTER Trial.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gargiulo; Giovanni Esposito; Plinio Cirillo; Michael Nagler; Pietro Minuz; Gianluca Campo; Felice Gragnano; Negar Manavifar; Raffaele Piccolo; Marisa Avvedimento; Matteo Tebaldi; Andreas Wahl; Lukas Hunziker; Michael Billinger; Dik Heg; Stephan Windecker; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Cangrelor, Tirofiban, and Chewed or Standard Prasugrel Regimens in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Primary Results of the FABOLUS-FASTER Trial.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gargiulo; Giovanni Esposito; Marisa Avvedimento; Michael Nagler; Pietro Minuz; Gianluca Campo; Felice Gragnano; Negar Manavifar; Raffaele Piccolo; Matteo Tebaldi; Plinio Cirillo; Lukas Hunziker; Pascal Vranckx; Sergio Leonardi; Dik Heg; Stephan Windecker; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Current and Future Insights for Optimizing Antithrombotic Therapy to Reduce the Burden of Cardiovascular Ischemic Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Abi Selvarajah; Anne H Tavenier; Enrico Fabris; Maarten A H van Leeuwen; Renicus S Hermanides
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.