Literature DB >> 30883505

Circulating Cell-Free DNA-Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications in Personalized Cancer Therapy.

Michael Oellerich1, Ekkehard Schütz2, Julia Beck2, Philip D Walson1.   

Abstract

Genomic analyses in oncologic care allow for the development of more precise clinical laboratory tests that will be critical for personalized pharmacotherapy. Traditional biopsy-based approaches are limited by the availability of sequential tissue specimens to detect resistance. Blood-based genomic profiling ("liquid biopsy") is useful for longitudinal monitoring of tumor genomes and can complement biopsies. Tumor-associated mutations can be identified in cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patient blood samples and used for monitoring disease activity. The US Food and Drug Administration approved a liquid biopsy test for EGFR-activating mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer as a companion diagnostic for therapy selection. ctDNA also allows for the identification of mutations selected by treatment such as EGFR T790M in non-small-cell lung cancer. ctDNA can also detect mutations such as KRAS G12V in colorectal cancer and BRAF V600E/V600K in melanoma. Chromosomal aberration pattern analysis by low-coverage whole genome sequencing is a new, broader approach. Genomic imbalances detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can be used to compute a copy number instability (CNI) score. In clinical studies, it was demonstrated that the change in CNI score can serve as an early predictor of therapeutic response to chemotherapy/immunotherapy of many cancer types. In multivariable models, it could be shown that the CNI score was superior to clinical parameters for prediction of overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer. There is emerging evidence for the clinical validity of ctDNA testing regarding identification of candidates for targeted therapies, prediction of therapeutic response, early detection of recurrence, resistance mutation detection, measuring genetic heterogeneity, tumor burden monitoring, and risk stratification. Improvement of sensitivity to detect tumors at very early stages is difficult due to insufficient mutant DNA fraction of ≤0.01%. Further developments will include validation in prospective multicenter interventional outcome studies and the development of digital platforms to integrate diagnostic data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30883505     DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  10 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Profiling of Liquid Biopsies for Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Edgar E Gonzalez-Kozlova
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Detection of Cell Types Contributing to Cancer From Circulating, Cell-Free Methylated DNA.

Authors:  Megan E Barefoot; Netanel Loyfer; Amber J Kiliti; A Patrick McDeed; Tommy Kaplan; Anton Wellstein
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Circulating Tumor DNA Correlates with Outcome in Metastatic Melanoma Treated by BRAF and MEK Inhibitors - Results of a Prospective Biomarker Study.

Authors:  Andrea Forschner; Stephanie Weißgraeber; Dirk Hadaschik; Martin Schulze; Maria Kopp; Sabine Kelkenberg; Tobias Sinnberg; Claus Garbe; Saskia Biskup; Florian Battke
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Implementation of Novel Molecular Biomarkers for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Netherlands: How to Deal With Increasing Complexity.

Authors:  Daan van den Broek; T Jeroen N Hiltermann; Bonne Biesma; Winand N M Dinjens; Nils A 't Hart; John W J Hinrichs; Mathie P G Leers; Kim Monkhorst; Matthijs van Oosterhout; Volkher Scharnhorst; Ed Schuuring; Ernst-Jan M Speel; Michel M van den Heuvel; Ron H N van Schaik; Jan von der Thüsen; Stefan M Willems; Leonie de Visser; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Ready-to-use nanopore platform for the detection of any DNA/RNA oligo at attomole range using an Osmium tagged complementary probe.

Authors:  Albert S W Kang; Janette G Bernasconi; William Jack; Anastassia Kanavarioti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Detection of KRAS mutations in liquid biopsies from metastatic colorectal cancer patients using droplet digital PCR, Idylla, and next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Matilda Holm; Emma Andersson; Emerik Osterlund; Ali Ovissi; Leena-Maija Soveri; Anna-Kaisa Anttonen; Soili Kytölä; Kristiina Aittomäki; Pia Osterlund; Ari Ristimäki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Clinical Efficacy of Pyrotinib Combined with Capecitabine in the Second-Line or Above Treatment for HER-2 Positive Advanced Breast Cancer and Its Association with Cell-Free DNA.

Authors:  Yajun Miao; Juan Chen; Rong Deng; Yufei Liu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.501

8.  An Improved Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Extracellular Vesicles-Depleted Plasma.

Authors:  Li Sun; Meijun Du; Manish Kohli; Chiang-Ching Huang; Xiaoxiang Chen; Mu Xu; Hongbing Shen; Shukui Wang; Liang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 9.  CRISPR/Cas9 and next generation sequencing in the personalized treatment of Cancer.

Authors:  Sushmaa Chandralekha Selvakumar; K Auxzilia Preethi; Kehinde Ross; Deusdedit Tusubira; Mohd Wajid Ali Khan; Panagal Mani; Tentu Nageswara Rao; Durairaj Sekar
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Applicability of liquid biopsies to represent the mutational profile of tumor tissue from different cancer entities.

Authors:  Evelyn Kidess-Sigal; Diana Braunholz; Sandra Liebs; Theresa Eder; Frederick Klauschen; Moritz Schütte; Marie-Laure Yaspo; Ulrich Keilholz; Ingeborg Tinhofer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 9.867

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.