Ultrastructural study comparing the efficacy of five different methods of intraoperative myocardial protection in the human heart.

The quality of myocardial protection during cardiac arrest in cardiac operations was investigated in 310 patients. Eighty patients underwent aortic valve replacement and 230 had coronary artery bypass grafting. Four different cardioplegic solutions (Kirsch, Bretschneider, St. Thomas' Hospital, and Hamburg) and the method of induced fibrillation were tested by ultrastructural analysis of the degree of ischemic injury at the end of the cardiac arrest period. Hypothermia was identical in all five groups. In this study, subendocardial and subepicardial needle biopsies were evaluated by a standardized scoring system. Chemical cardioplegia produced mainly moderate ultrastructural injury independent of the time of ischemia. Kirsch cardioplegia and the intermittent fibrillation procedure produced ischemic injury of greater and unpredictable severity. Only with Kirsch cardioplegia was a correlation observed between the duration of intraoperative arrest and the degree of injury, which is indicative of a lack of myocardial protection. The tolerance to ischemia was significantly better in patients undergoing bypass grafting than in those with aortic valve disease and therefore longstanding hypertrophy. In conclusion, the Bretschneider, St. Thomas' Hospital, and Hamburg solutions provide satisfactory myocardial protection but are not able to completely prevent myocardial ischemic injury. Kirsch cardioplegia and the intermittent fibrillation procedure provide insufficient myocardial protection. Patients with left ventricular hypertrophy are at a greater risk during cardiac operations than patients undergoing coronary bypass operations.