Literature DB >> 30882085

Erratum to: Influence of Probiotics-Friendly Pig Production on Meat Quality and Physicochemical Characteristics.

Sung Yong Chang1, Shah Ahmed Belal2, Da Rae Kang2, Yang Il Choi3, Young Hoon Kim1, Ho Sung Choe2, Jae Young Heo4, Kawn Seob Shim2.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2018.38.2.403.].

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30882085      PMCID: PMC6411247          DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour        ISSN: 2636-0772


Erratum

In the published article “Influence of Probiotics-Friendly Pig Production on Meat Quality and Physicochemical Characteristics. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 38:403-416. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.38.2.403,” some sentences have to be modified. As shown in the table below, the editorial office would like to amend the text in four places and two references. The editorial office will report that this amendment is made at the request of the author.
Page & LineBeforeAfter
p. 404, line 7Among various probiotic bacteria, Lactobacillus is the most commonly used probiotic agent (McCony and Gilliland, 2007).Lactobacillus is the most useful probiotic agent among a range of probiotic bacteria (McCony and Gilliland, 2007).
p. 404, line 24Most suggested positive effects of dietary probiotics on the carcass (Alexopoulos et al., 2004;Sudikas et al., 2010) and pork quality (Liu et al., 2013; Suo et al., 2012), and that the probiotic administration could be useful tomodify and improve the fatty acid profile and lower cholesterol levels in pig meat (Barowicz et al., 2003; Ross et al.,2012).A large number of previous studies indicated that dietary probiotics had positive effects on the carcass and pig meat quality (Alexopoulos et al., 2004; Jukna et al. 2005; Liu et al., 2013; Meng et al. 2010; Sudikas et al., 2010; Suo et al., 2012), and also had positive influence on the fatty acid profile in pork (Rekiel et al., 2005; Ross et al., 2012).
p. 408, line 33Also Liu et al. (2013) showed that the supplementation with probiotics (yeasts, lactic acid-producing bacteria and Bacillus subtilis) reduced the drip loss and cooking loss of pork, but had no effect on pH and shear force.Liu et al. (2013) reported that probiotics supplementation lowered the drip loss and cooking loss, but there is no effect on pH and shear force of pork compared to the control group.
p. 410, line 2Li and Chen (2009) showed that probiotics significantly reduced MDA content of muscles, inhibited muscle lipid peroxidation, reduced the rate of water loss and stabilized color, and improved the meat quality.Supplementation of probiotics significantly decreased the MDA level, inhibited the lipid peroxidation, stabilized the meat color, lowered the water loss rate, and improved the quality of meat (Li and Chen, 2009).
References SectionBarowicz T, Migdał W, Pieszka M, Živković B. 2003. The effect of linseed PUFA n-3 and probiotics on fatty acid composition and cholesterol level in longissimus dorsi muscle of fatteners. Biotechnol Anim Husb 19:31-36.Removed
References SectionNoneRekiel A, Wiecek J, Dziuba M. 2005. Effect of feed additives on the results of fattening and selected slaughter and quality traits of pork meat of pigs with different genotypes. Czech J Anim Sci 50:561-573.
  1 in total

1.  Influence of Probiotics-Friendly Pig Production on Meat Quality and Physicochemical Characteristics.

Authors:  Sung Yong Chang; Shah Ahmed Belal; Da Rae Kang; Yang Il Choi; Young Hoon Kim; Ho Sung Choe; Jae Young Heo; Kawn Seob Shim
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.622

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.