| Literature DB >> 30881957 |
Magalie Viallon1,2,3,4,5, Benjamin Leporq1,3,4,5, Stephan Drinda6,7, Françoise Wilhelmi de Toledo7, Bogdan Galusca1,2,8, Helene Ratiney1,3,4,5, Pierre Croisille1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of measuring the effects of a 14-day Periodic Fasting (PF) intervention (<200 cal) on multi-organs of primary interest (liver, visceral/subcutaneous/bone marrow fat, muscle) using non-invasive advanced magnetic resonance spectroscopic (MRS) and imaging (MRI) methods.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; chemical shift encoded MRI; fasting; low caloric diet; quantitative image analysis (QIA); quantitative imaging; spectroscopy
Year: 2019 PMID: 30881957 PMCID: PMC6407435 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Liver post-processing pipeline of CSE-MRI based analysis. Magnitude and phase images acquired at multiple echo times are processed using an automatized pipeline integrating: phase correction (Phase images were unwrapped to compute the B0 field inhomogeneities (ΔB0) map and the ΔB0-demodulated real part images from which fat-water separation was performed. The fat-water separation step provided parametric - and PDFF- maps. From the ΔB0 map, external (Bout), and internal field (Bint) were separated using the projection unto dipole field. From Bint, the dipole inversion was performed with a single orientation Bayesian regularization including spatial priors derived from magnitude images for the boundary conditions, error and smoothness weighting to compute the susceptibility map), automated segmentation to derived final Subcutaneous and Visceral Adipose Tissue (SAT/VAT), and cartographies of quantitative parameters PDFF(%), T2*(ms), and Chi [~ΔB0 (ppm)]. In the adipose tissue, Model-based quantification was performed to extract fatty acid composition. First order radiomic features were extracted for each parametric map.
Figure 2Skeletal muscle post-processing pipeline of CSE-MRI based analysis. Magnitude and phase images acquired at multiple echo times are processed using an automatized pipeline integrating: phase correction, fat-water separation to cartographies of quantitative parameters PDFF(%), T2*(ms), and Chi [~ΔB0 (ppm)], automated segmentation to derived final Subcutaneous and Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue (SAT/BMAT). In the adipose tissue, Model-based quantification was performed to extract Fatty acid composition. First order radiomic features in the muscle were extracted for each parametric map.
Figure 4(A) STEAM MRS spectra showing the evolution of IMCL (intra-myocellular lipid) and EMCL (extra-myocellular lipid) concentrations in the muscle of the subject at the 4-time points: before and at the end of the fasting period, 4 days after refeeding (build-up period), and 1 month after. (B) Zoom on the 6.5 to 9 ppm region providing a detailed view on carnosine C4 and C2 resonances. (C) Graph showing the evolution of IMCL, EMCL, and carnosine concentrations in the muscle of the subject at the 4-time points using STEAM MRS monovoxel acquisition.
Figure 3(A) Five STEAM monovoxel spectra acquired on the liver with the HISTO sequence before fasting at different TE in order to determine water and lipid T2 and estimate a PDFF corrected for T2 weighting. (B) 1H MRS liver spectrum acquired with a short echo time STEAM sequence [here, on echo of the HISTO sequence, TE = 24 ms, NA = 4), without pre-saturation, before, and after fasting. (C) Quantification of lipid content for this subject was of 3.3% before and 3.1% after fasting as estimated with QUEST on STEAM –TE20ms (no T2 correction)] and of 3.1 vs. 2.9% for HISTO-PDFF (with T2 correction) estimation, showing consistency among the two measurements.
Liver and upper abdomen adipose tissue analysis.
| VAT fraction | NA | NA | NA | ||||||
| PDFF (%) | 89.0 ± 6.6 | 87.6 ± 7.7 | 86.9 ± 7.3 | 85.2 ± 8.3 | 84.4 ± 7.8 | 82.4 ± 8.0 | |||
| 24.3 ± 15.7 | 21.4 ± 15.7 | 22.4 ± 20.8 | 17.1 ± 17.1 | 21.1 ± 17.7 | 16.8 ± 16.8 | ||||
| SFA (%) | NA | NA | NA | ||||||
| MUFA (%) | NA | NA | NA | ||||||
| PUFA (%) | NA | NA | NA | ||||||
NB, VAT fraction = VAT/(SAT+VAT).
Trunk and lower abdominal adipose tissue analysis.
| Volume (cm3) | 45.3 | 44.6 | 45 | ||||||
| VAT fraction (%) | |||||||||
| PDFF (%) | 90.9 ± 6.5 | 92.0 ± 6.4 | 89.3 ± 6.7 | 80.6 ± 11.7 | 80.5 ± 12.0 | 79.3 ± 11.8 | 50.9 ± 3.3 | 54.4 ± 5.6 | 59.3 ± 1.4 |
| 27.1 ± 18.2 | 28.0 ± 18.6 | 25.3 ± 20.2 | 22.7 ± 17.6 | 22.5 ± 17.0 | 22.8 ± 20.5 | 8.1 ± 3.3 | 8.2 ± 2.6 | 7.1 ± 0.2 | |
| SFA (%) | 44.9 ± 14.3 | 46.0 ± 12.6 | 48.2 ± 18.7 | 49.2 ± 17.9 | |||||
| MUFA (%) | 39.7 ± 10.0 | 39.8 ± 7.8 | 36.0 ± 9.0 | 35.9 ± 11.4 | 35.9 ± 10.3 | 33.5 ± 10.8 | |||
| PUFA (%) | |||||||||
NB, VAT fraction = VAT/(SAT+VAT).
Thigh adipose tissue analysis.
| Volume (cm3) | 278 | 280 (+0.7%) | 279 (+0.3%) | ||||||
| PDFF (%) | 88.0 ± 1.0 | 87.7 ± 0.4 | 85.9 ± 1.2 | 95.8 ± 2.1 | 92.8 ± 1.7 | 95.9 ± 1.6 | 5.43 ± 6.28 | 5.66 ± 5.99 | 6.32 ± 6.56 |
| 39.7 ± 3.8 | 37.4 ± 1.2 | 38.1 ± 3.9 | 25.6 ± 3.0 | 22.7 ± 0.6 | 25.2 ± 0.5 | 23.7 ± 6.6 | 23.4 ± 6.4 | 23.3 ± 7.1 | |
| SFA (%) | 52.8 ± 1.1 | 52.3 ± 0.6 | 50.0 ± 1.4 | NA | NA | NA | |||
| MUFA (%) | 36.1 ± 0.3 | 35.9 ± 0.2 | 36.3 ± 0.7 | NA | NA | NA | |||
| PUFA (%) | NA | NA | NA | ||||||
Figure 5Model-based calculated local Adipose tissue fatty acid composition: results in the liver.