Literature DB >> 30880847

The Space Physics Environment Data Analysis System (SPEDAS).

V Angelopoulos1, P Cruce1, A Drozdov1, E W Grimes1, N Hatzigeorgiu2, D A King2, D Larson2, J W Lewis2, J M McTiernan2, D A Roberts3, C L Russell1, T Hori4, Y Kasahara5, A Kumamoto6, A Matsuoka7, Y Miyashita8, Y Miyoshi4, I Shinohara7, M Teramoto4, J B Faden9, A J Halford10, M McCarthy11, R M Millan12, J G Sample13, D M Smith14, L A Woodger12, A Masson15, A A Narock16, K Asamura7, T F Chang4, C-Y Chiang17, Y Kazama18, K Keika19, S Matsuda4, T Segawa4, K Seki19, M Shoji4, S W Y Tam17, N Umemura4, B-J Wang18,20, S-Y Wang18, R Redmon21, J V Rodriguez21,22, H J Singer23, J Vandegriff24, S Abe25, M Nose26,4, A Shinbori4, Y-M Tanaka27, S UeNo28, L Andersson29, P Dunn2, C Fowler29, J S Halekas30, T Hara2, Y Harada31, C O Lee2, R Lillis2, D L Mitchell2, M R Argall32, K Bromund3, J L Burch33, I J Cohen24, M Galloy34, B Giles3, A N Jaynes30, O Le Contel35, M Oka2, T D Phan2, B M Walsh36, J Westlake24, F D Wilder29, S D Bale2, R Livi2, M Pulupa2, P Whittlesey2, A DeWolfe29, B Harter29, E Lucas29, U Auster37, J W Bonnell2, C M Cully38, E Donovan38, R E Ergun29, H U Frey2, B Jackel38, A Keiling2, H Korth24, J P McFadden2, Y Nishimura39, F Plaschke40, P Robert35, D L Turner41, J M Weygand1, R M Candey3, R C Johnson16, T Kovalick16, M H Liu16, R E McGuire3, A Breneman42, K Kersten42, P Schroeder2.   

Abstract

With the advent of the Heliophysics/Geospace System Observatory (H/GSO), a complement of multi-spacecraft missions and ground-based observatories to study the space environment, data retrieval, analysis, and visualization of space physics data can be daunting. The Space Physics Environment Data Analysis System (SPEDAS), a grass-roots software development platform (www.spedas.org), is now officially supported by NASA Heliophysics as part of its data environment infrastructure. It serves more than a dozen space missions and ground observatories and can integrate the full complement of past and upcoming space physics missions with minimal resources, following clear, simple, and well-proven guidelines. Free, modular and configurable to the needs of individual missions, it works in both command-line (ideal for experienced users) and Graphical User Interface (GUI) mode (reducing the learning curve for first-time users). Both options have "crib-sheets," user-command sequences in ASCII format that can facilitate record-and-repeat actions, especially for complex operations and plotting. Crib-sheets enhance scientific interactions, as users can move rapidly and accurately from exchanges of technical information on data processing to efficient discussions regarding data interpretation and science. SPEDAS can readily query and ingest all International Solar Terrestrial Physics (ISTP)-compatible products from the Space Physics Data Facility (SPDF), enabling access to a vast collection of historic and current mission data. The planned incorporation of Heliophysics Application Programmer's Interface (HAPI) standards will facilitate data ingestion from distributed datasets that adhere to these standards. Although SPEDAS is currently Interactive Data Language (IDL)-based (and interfaces to Java-based tools such as Autoplot), efforts are under-way to expand it further to work with python (first as an interface tool and potentially even receiving an under-the-hood replacement). We review the SPEDAS development history, goals, and current implementation. We explain its "modes of use" with examples geared for users and outline its technical implementation and requirements with software developers in mind. We also describe SPEDAS personnel and software management, interfaces with other organizations, resources and support structure available to the community, and future development plans. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11214-018-0576-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geospace science; Ionospheric physics; Magnetospheric physics; Planetary magnetospheres; Solar wind; Space plasmas

Year:  2019        PMID: 30880847      PMCID: PMC6380193          DOI: 10.1007/s11214-018-0576-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Space Sci Rev        ISSN: 0038-6308            Impact factor:   8.017


  3 in total

1.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A summary of the BARREL campaigns: Technique for studying electron precipitation.

Authors:  L A Woodger; A J Halford; R M Millan; M P McCarthy; D M Smith; G S Bowers; J G Sample; B R Anderson; X Liang
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.811

  3 in total
  16 in total

1.  Reflected Protons in the Lunar Wake and Their Effects on Wake Potentials.

Authors:  Shaosui Xu; Andrew R Poppe; Jasper S Halekas; Yuki Harada
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 2.811

2.  Mapping the Lunar Wake Potential Structure With ARTEMIS Data.

Authors:  Shaosui Xu; Andrew R Poppe; Jasper S Halekas; David L Mitchell; James P McFadden; Yuki Harada
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.811

3.  Juno Observations of Heavy Ion Energization During Transient Dipolarizations in Jupiter Magnetotail.

Authors:  A V Artemyev; G Clark; B Mauk; M F Vogt; X-J Zhang
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.811

4.  Magnetosheath Jet Occurrence Rate in Relation to CMEs and SIRs.

Authors:  Florian Koller; Manuela Temmer; Luis Preisser; Ferdinand Plaschke; Paul Geyer; Lan K Jian; Owen W Roberts; Heli Hietala; Adrian T LaMoury
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.111

5.  Modeling Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability at the High-Latitude Boundary Layer in a Global Magnetosphere Simulation.

Authors:  A T Michael; K A Sorathia; V G Merkin; K Nykyri; B Burkholder; X Ma; A Y Ukhorskiy; J Garretson
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.576

6.  Reconstruction of the Electron Diffusion Region With Inertia and Compressibility Effects.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; T K M Nakamura; R E Denton
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.111

7.  Fluid-Kinetic Variations in the Storm-Time Inner Magnetosphere.

Authors:  Christopher C Chaston
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.576

8.  A Survey of Dense Low Energy Ions in Earth's Outer Magnetosphere: Relation to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure, IMF, and Magnetospheric Activity.

Authors:  Arthur J Hull; Oleksiy Agapitov; Forrest S Mozer; James P McFadden; Vassilis Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.111

9.  Statistical Study of Whistler-Mode Waves and Expected Pitch Angle Diffusion Rates During Dispersionless Electron Injections.

Authors:  R Ghaffari; C M Cully; C Gabrielse
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 5.576

10.  Collisionless relaxation of a disequilibrated current sheet and implications for bifurcated structures.

Authors:  Young Dae Yoon; Gunsu S Yun; Deirdre E Wendel; James L Burch
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.