Literature DB >> 30880123

Role of agonist efficacy in exposure-induced enhancement of mu opioid reward in rats.

Megan J Moerke1, S Stevens Negus2.   

Abstract

The abuse potential of opioid analgesics in humans appears to increase rapidly during initial regimens of opioid exposure. Previous work using intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS), a preclinical procedure useful for studying rewarding drug effects in drug-naïve animals, has similarly shown that rewarding effects of mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists increase rapidly in rats during initial regimens of opioid administration. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the role of MOR agonist efficacy as a determinant in eliciting this trajectory of increased rewarding effects during initial opioid exposure in opioid-naïve rats. Separate groups of adult, male Sprague-Dawley rats responded for electrical brain stimulation using a frequency-rate ICSS procedure and received repeated daily treatment with vehicle or one of five MOR agonists that ranged from low to high efficacy (NAQ, nalbuphine, buprenorphine, fentanyl, methadone). Two additional groups were used to evaluate effects of repeated treatment with non-opioids (the cannabinoid CP55940 or the monoamine releaser amphetamine). Morphine was tested after each repeated treatment. In opioid-naïve rats tested before repeated dosing, MOR agonists produced primarily dose- and efficacy-dependent decreases in ICSS. Following repeated treatment, all MOR agonists except NAQ produced tolerance to opioid-induced rate-decreasing effects and enhanced expression of ICSS facilitation (indicative of opioid reward) by both the repeatedly administered drug and morphine. Repeated treatment with CP55940 and amphetamine produced different effects. Collectively, these results provide evidence to suggest that enhanced expression of opioid reward after initial regimens of opioid exposure has a low requirement for MOR agonist efficacy and is pharmacologically selective.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficacy; Intracranial self-stimulation; Morphine; Mu opioid receptor; Repeated dosing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30880123      PMCID: PMC6500752          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropharmacology        ISSN: 0028-3908            Impact factor:   5.250


  36 in total

1.  Effects of acute and repeated treatment with the biased mu opioid receptor agonist TRV130 (oliceridine) on measures of antinociception, gastrointestinal function, and abuse liability in rodents.

Authors:  Ahmad A Altarifi; Bethany David; Karan H Muchhala; Bruce E Blough; Hamid Akbarali; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.153

2.  Separation of inhibiting and stimulating effects of morphine on self-stimulation behaviour by intracerebral microinjections.

Authors:  C L Broekkamp; J H Van den Bogaard; H J Heijnen; R H Rops; A R Cools; J M Van Rossum
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 4.432

3.  Amphetamine maintenance differentially modulates effects of cocaine, methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), and methamphetamine on intracranial self-stimulation and nucleus accumbens dopamine in rats.

Authors:  Amy R Johnson; Matthew L Banks; Dana E Selley; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Signal transduction correlates of mu opioid agonist intrinsic efficacy: receptor-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding in mMOR-CHO cells and rat thalamus.

Authors:  D E Selley; Q Liu; S R Childers
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 5.  Common liability to addiction and "gateway hypothesis": theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Michael M Vanyukov; Ralph E Tarter; Galina P Kirillova; Levent Kirisci; Maureen D Reynolds; Mary Jeanne Kreek; Kevin P Conway; Brion S Maher; William G Iacono; Laura Bierut; Michael C Neale; Duncan B Clark; Ty A Ridenour
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 6.  Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Laurence L Miller
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 25.468

7.  Use of intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse-related and abuse-limiting effects of monoamine releasers in rats.

Authors:  C T Bauer; M L Banks; B E Blough; S S Negus
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Characterization of opioid agonist efficacy in a C6 glioma cell line expressing the mu opioid receptor.

Authors:  P J Emmerson; M J Clark; A Mansour; H Akil; J H Woods; F Medzihradsky
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Role of µ-opioid receptor reserve and µ-agonist efficacy as determinants of the effects of µ-agonists on intracranial self-stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Ahmad A Altarifi; Laurence L Miller; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Enhanced rewarding properties of morphine, but not cocaine, in beta(arrestin)-2 knock-out mice.

Authors:  Laura M Bohn; Raul R Gainetdinov; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Ivan O Medvedev; Robert J Lefkowitz; Linda A Dykstra; Marc G Caron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Lack of effect of the nociceptin opioid peptide agonist Ro 64-6198 on pain-depressed behavior and heroin choice in rats.

Authors:  Megan Jo Moerke; S Stevens Negus; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Opioid-like adverse effects of tianeptine in male rats and mice.

Authors:  T R Baird; H I Akbarali; W L Dewey; H Elder; M Kang; S A Marsh; M R Peace; J L Poklis; E J Santos; S S Negus
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Activation of mesocorticolimbic dopamine projections initiates cue-induced reinstatement of reward seeking in mice.

Authors:  Man-Yi Jing; Xiao-Yan Ding; Xiao Han; Tai-Yun Zhao; Min-Min Luo; Ning Wu; Jin Li; Rui Song
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 7.169

4.  Confronting the opioid crisis with basic research in neuropharmacology.

Authors:  Michael H Baumann; Gavril W Pasternak; Sidney S Negus
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Changes in fentanyl demand following naltrexone, morphine, and buprenorphine in male rats.

Authors:  Lindsey R Hammerslag; Rebecca S Hofford; Qiwen Kang; Richard J Kryscio; Joshua S Beckmann; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Temporal parameters of enhanced opioid reward after initial opioid exposure in rats.

Authors:  Megan J Moerke; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Antinociceptive and Abuse Potential Effects of Cannabinoid/Opioid Combinations in a Chronic Pain Model in Rats.

Authors:  Mohammad Alsalem; Ahmad Altarifi; Mansour Haddad; Sara A Aldossary; Heba Kalbouneh; Nour Aldaoud; Tareq Saleh; Khalid El-Salem
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-11-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.