| Literature DB >> 30880013 |
Ammie K Kalan1, Gottfried Hohmann2, Mimi Arandjelovic2, Christophe Boesch3, Maureen S McCarthy2, Anthony Agbor2, Samuel Angedakin2, Emma Bailey2, Cosma Wilungula Balongelwa4, Mattia Bessone5, Gaëlle Bocksberger2, Sally Jewel Coxe6, Tobias Deschner2, Marie-Lyne Després-Einspenner2, Paula Dieguez2, Barbara Fruth7, Ilka Herbinger8, Anne-Céline Granjon2, Josephine Head2, Yves Aka Kablan3, Kevin E Langergraber9, Albert Lotana Lokasola6, Giovanna Maretti2, Sergio Marrocoli2, Menard Mbende10, Jennifer Moustgaard6, Paul Kouame N'Goran11, Martha M Robbins2, Joost van Schijndel2, Volker Sommer12, Martin Surbeck13, Nikki Tagg14, Jacob Willie14, Roman M Wittig15, Hjalmar S Kühl16.
Abstract
Temperament and personality research in humans and nonhuman animals measures behavioral variation in individual, population, or species-specific traits with implications for survival and fitness, such as social status, foraging, and mating success [1-5]. Curiosity and risk-taking tendencies have been studied extensively across taxa by measuring boldness and exploration responses to experimental novelty exposure [3, 4, 6-15]. Here, we conduct a natural field experiment using wildlife monitoring technology to test variation in the reaction of wild great apes (43 groups of naive chimpanzees, bonobos, and western gorillas across 14 field sites in Africa) to a novel object, the camera trap. Bonobo and gorilla groups demonstrated a stronger looking impulse toward the camera trap device compared to chimpanzees, suggesting higher visual attention and curiosity. Bonobos were also more likely to show alarm and other fearful behaviors, although such neophobic (and conversely, neophilic) responses were generally rare. Among all three species, individuals looked at cameras longer when they were young, were associating with fewer individuals, and did not live near a long-term research site. Overall, these findings partially validate results from great ape novelty paradigms in captivity [7, 8]. We further suggest that species-typical leadership styles [16] and social and environmental effects, including familiarity with humans, best explain novelty responses of wild great apes. In sum, this study illustrates the feasibility of large-scale field experiments and the importance of both intrinsic and extrinsic factors in shaping animal curiosity. VIDEO ABSTRACT.Entities:
Keywords: Gorilla gorilla; Pan paniscus; Pan troglodytes; behavioral reaction; curiosity; exploration; looking impulse; neophobia; novel object; temperament
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30880013 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Biol ISSN: 0960-9822 Impact factor: 10.834