Literature DB >> 30880013

Novelty Response of Wild African Apes to Camera Traps.

Ammie K Kalan1, Gottfried Hohmann2, Mimi Arandjelovic2, Christophe Boesch3, Maureen S McCarthy2, Anthony Agbor2, Samuel Angedakin2, Emma Bailey2, Cosma Wilungula Balongelwa4, Mattia Bessone5, Gaëlle Bocksberger2, Sally Jewel Coxe6, Tobias Deschner2, Marie-Lyne Després-Einspenner2, Paula Dieguez2, Barbara Fruth7, Ilka Herbinger8, Anne-Céline Granjon2, Josephine Head2, Yves Aka Kablan3, Kevin E Langergraber9, Albert Lotana Lokasola6, Giovanna Maretti2, Sergio Marrocoli2, Menard Mbende10, Jennifer Moustgaard6, Paul Kouame N'Goran11, Martha M Robbins2, Joost van Schijndel2, Volker Sommer12, Martin Surbeck13, Nikki Tagg14, Jacob Willie14, Roman M Wittig15, Hjalmar S Kühl16.   

Abstract

Temperament and personality research in humans and nonhuman animals measures behavioral variation in individual, population, or species-specific traits with implications for survival and fitness, such as social status, foraging, and mating success [1-5]. Curiosity and risk-taking tendencies have been studied extensively across taxa by measuring boldness and exploration responses to experimental novelty exposure [3, 4, 6-15]. Here, we conduct a natural field experiment using wildlife monitoring technology to test variation in the reaction of wild great apes (43 groups of naive chimpanzees, bonobos, and western gorillas across 14 field sites in Africa) to a novel object, the camera trap. Bonobo and gorilla groups demonstrated a stronger looking impulse toward the camera trap device compared to chimpanzees, suggesting higher visual attention and curiosity. Bonobos were also more likely to show alarm and other fearful behaviors, although such neophobic (and conversely, neophilic) responses were generally rare. Among all three species, individuals looked at cameras longer when they were young, were associating with fewer individuals, and did not live near a long-term research site. Overall, these findings partially validate results from great ape novelty paradigms in captivity [7, 8]. We further suggest that species-typical leadership styles [16] and social and environmental effects, including familiarity with humans, best explain novelty responses of wild great apes. In sum, this study illustrates the feasibility of large-scale field experiments and the importance of both intrinsic and extrinsic factors in shaping animal curiosity. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gorilla gorilla; Pan paniscus; Pan troglodytes; behavioral reaction; curiosity; exploration; looking impulse; neophobia; novel object; temperament

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30880013     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  8 in total

1.  Field experiments find no evidence that chimpanzee nut cracking can be independently innovated.

Authors:  Kathelijne Koops; Aly Gaspard Soumah; Kelly L van Leeuwen; Henry Didier Camara; Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-01-24

2.  Animal reactivity to camera traps and its effects on abundance estimate using distance sampling in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  Noël Adiko Houa; Noémie Cappelle; Eloi Anderson Bitty; Emmanuelle Normand; Yves Aka Kablan; Christophe Boesch
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  First report of a leopard (Panthera pardus)-bonobo (Pan paniscus) encounter at the LuiKotale study site, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Authors:  Nicolas Corredor-Ospina; Melodie Kreyer; Giulia Rossi; Gottfried Hohmann; Barbara Fruth
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.163

4.  Information transfer efficiency differs in wild chimpanzees and bonobos, but not social cognition.

Authors:  Cédric Girard-Buttoz; Martin Surbeck; Liran Samuni; Patrick Tkaczynski; Christophe Boesch; Barbara Fruth; Roman M Wittig; Gottfried Hohmann; Catherine Crockford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Chimpanzees balance resources and risk in an anthropogenic landscape of fear.

Authors:  Elena Bersacola; Catherine M Hill; Kimberley J Hockings
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Captivity and habituation to humans raise curiosity in vervet monkeys.

Authors:  Sofia Ingrid Fredrika Forss; Alba Motes-Rodrigo; Pooja Dongre; Tecla Mohr; Erica van de Waal
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.899

7.  Behavioral "bycatch" from camera trap surveys yields insights on prey responses to human-mediated predation risk.

Authors:  A Cole Burton; Christopher Beirne; Catherine Sun; Alys Granados; Michael Procko; Cheng Chen; Mitchell Fennell; Alexia Constantinou; Chris Colton; Katie Tjaden-McClement; Jason T Fisher; Joanna Burgar
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 8.  Innovations in Camera Trapping Technology and Approaches: The Integration of Citizen Science and Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Siân E Green; Jonathan P Rees; Philip A Stephens; Russell A Hill; Anthony J Giordano
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.