Literature DB >> 30879720

Factors affecting cataract surgery operating time among trainees and consultants.

Paul Nderitu1, Paul Ursell2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define factors affecting cataract surgery operating time for operating room planning, optimizing throughput, enhancing patient experiences, minimizing costs, and allocating training time.
SETTING: Epsom and St. Helier University National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: All patients who had primary manual phacoemulsification cataract surgery from January 1, 2012, to December 30, 2016, were included. Combined anterior and posterior segment procedures and surgeons with fewer than 50 cases were excluded. Anonymized data collected were demographics, anesthesia, operating time, surgeon grade, case complexity, pupil size, pupil expander or capsular tension ring (CTR) use, intraocular lens type, posterior capsule or zonular fiber rupture or dialysis, vitreous loss, and automated anterior vitrectomy.
RESULTS: From 11 067 cases, 9552 (86.3%) had a recorded operating time. The mean ± SD operating times in minutes were as follows: consultants 19 ± 10, junior 30 ± 11, intermediate 27 ± 12, senior trainees 24 ± 10, and fellows 31 ± 11. Operating time was significantly shorter for topical than for sub-Tenon or general anesthesia, especially among trainees. Consultant operating time remained unchanged with increasing case complexity, except for high-complexity cases. Small pupils, pupil expander or CTR use, posterior capsule or zonular fiber rupture or dialysis with or without vitreous loss (mean 45 ± 23) were associated with increased operating times. Iris hooks were associated with greater increases in operating time than Malyugin rings (16 minutes versus 6 minutes; P < .001). There was a modest 3-minute decrease in operating time among consultants over 5 years.
CONCLUSION: Cataract surgery operating time was significantly influenced by anesthesia type, surgeon grade, high case complexity, pupil size, pupil expander use/type, CTR use, and intraoperative complications.
Copyright © 2019 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30879720     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

1.  Incidence of Incision-Related Descemet Membrane Detachment Using Phacoemulsification With Trapezoid vs Conventional 2.2-mm Clear Corneal Incision: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ye Dai; Zhenzhen Liu; Wei Wang; Xiaotong Han; Ling Jin; Xiaoyun Chen; Guangming Jin; Lanhua Wang; Enen Zhang; Bo Qu; Jianping Liu; Nathan Congdon; Mingguang He; Lixia Luo; Yizhi Liu
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 8.253

2.  Cataract Surgery in One-Eyed Patients: A Cohort Study of 100 Patients.

Authors:  Alexis Charles; Pascal Staccini; Arnaud Martel; Stéphanie Baillif
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Predictors of visual acuity improvement after phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Authors:  Saif Aldeen AlRyalat; Duha Atieh; Ayed AlHabashneh; Mariam Hassouneh; Rama Toukan; Renad Alawamleh; Taher Alshammari; Mohammed Abu-Ameerh
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-21

4.  Operative Time and Complication Rates of Resident Phacoemulsification Surgeries in a National University Hospital: A Five-Year Review.

Authors:  Maria Isabel N Umali; Teresita R Castillo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-24

5.  COVID-19 and cataract surgery backlog in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Shruti Aggarwal; Punya Jain; Amit Jain
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.528

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.