Lisa Jane Brighton1, Lucy Ellen Selman2, Katherine Bristowe3, Beth Edwards4, Jonathan Koffman5, Catherine J Evans6. 1. King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, London, UK. Electronic address: lisa.brighton@kcl.ac.uk. 2. Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: lucy.selman@bristol.ac.uk. 3. King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, London, UK. Electronic address: katherine.bristowe@kcl.ac.uk. 4. King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, London, UK. Electronic address: bethany.edwards@kcl.ac.uk. 5. King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, London, UK. Electronic address: jonathan.koffman@kcl.ac.uk. 6. King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, London, UK; Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Brighton, UK. Electronic address: catherine.evans@kcl.ac.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore generalist palliative care providers' experiences of emotional labour when undertaking conversations around palliative and end-of-life care with patients and families, to inform supportive strategies. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews conducted with generalist staff (those providing 'primary' or 'general' palliative care, not palliative care specialists) who had attended a communication workshop. Sampling was purposive (by gender, profession, experience). Data were analysed using a framework approach; a sample of transcripts were double-coded for rigour. Data collection and analysis were informed by theories of emotional labour, coping, and communication. RESULTS: Four ambulance staff, three nurses, two speech and language therapists, and one therapy assistant were interviewed. Five themes emerged: emotions experienced; emotion 'display rules'; emotion management; support needs; and perceived impact of emotional labour. Participants reported balancing 'human' and 'professional' expressions of emotion. Support needs included time for emotion management, workplace cultures that normalise emotional experiences, formal emotional support, and palliative and end-of-life care skills training. CONCLUSION: Diverse strategies to support the emotional needs of generalist staff are crucial to ensure high-quality end-of-life care and communication, and to support staff well-being. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Both formal and informal support is required, alongside skills training, to enable a supportive workplace culture and individual development.
OBJECTIVE: To explore generalist palliative care providers' experiences of emotional labour when undertaking conversations around palliative and end-of-life care with patients and families, to inform supportive strategies. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews conducted with generalist staff (those providing 'primary' or 'general' palliative care, not palliative care specialists) who had attended a communication workshop. Sampling was purposive (by gender, profession, experience). Data were analysed using a framework approach; a sample of transcripts were double-coded for rigour. Data collection and analysis were informed by theories of emotional labour, coping, and communication. RESULTS: Four ambulance staff, three nurses, two speech and language therapists, and one therapy assistant were interviewed. Five themes emerged: emotions experienced; emotion 'display rules'; emotion management; support needs; and perceived impact of emotional labour. Participants reported balancing 'human' and 'professional' expressions of emotion. Support needs included time for emotion management, workplace cultures that normalise emotional experiences, formal emotional support, and palliative and end-of-life care skills training. CONCLUSION: Diverse strategies to support the emotional needs of generalist staff are crucial to ensure high-quality end-of-life care and communication, and to support staff well-being. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Both formal and informal support is required, alongside skills training, to enable a supportive workplace culture and individual development.
Authors: Jonathan Koffman; Clarissa Penfold; Laura Cottrell; Bobbie Farsides; Catherine J Evans; Rachel Burman; Richard Nicholas; Stephen Ashford; Eli Silber Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Laura Cottrell; Guillaume Economos; Catherine Evans; Eli Silber; Rachel Burman; Richard Nicholas; Bobbie Farsides; Stephen Ashford; Jonathan Simon Koffman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Halle Johnson; Emel Yorganci; Catherine J Evans; Stephen Barclay; Fliss E M Murtagh; Deokhee Yi; Wei Gao; Elizabeth L Sampson; Joanne Droney; Morag Farquhar; Jonathan Koffman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Silvia Gonella; Paola Di Giulio; Alexandra Antal; Nicola Cornally; Peter Martin; Sara Campagna; Valerio Dimonte Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 3.390