Santillan-Garcia and Moran[1] had some criticisms as to the statistics of our article on the effect of
acupressure on pain in cancerpatients with bone metastasis.[2] Therefore, the statistical analysis of the article was repeated with expert
opinion, and the following explanations are needed.Because none of the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics showed significant
differences between groups, we did not use any further statistical method to control
possible confounding factors for Table 3. Additionally, we did not aim to show
causality; we just stressed that the correlation between pain scores and some conditions
can be affected by level of pain.The normality of distribution of continuous variables was tested by Shapiro-Wilk test.
Student’s t test (normal data) and Mann-Whitney U test
(nonnormal data) were used to again compare 2 independent groups. Analysis showed no
error. However, it was noticed that P values were misplaced. We revised
the original Table 4 based
on the correct P values.
Table 4.
(Revised) Comparison of the Relationship Between the VAS Pain Mean Scores of
Patients Before and After Acupressure.
Features
Intervention Group, X ± SD
Control Group, X ± SD
P
Pre-acupressure pain
7.6 ± 1.9
8.2 ± 1.7
.216
Post-acupressure pain
6.8 ± 1.9
7.7 ± 2.1
.101
Difference between pre-post
0.7 ± 1.1
0.4 ± 1.1
.556
P
.001
.041
(Revised) Comparison of the Relationship Between the VAS Pain Mean Scores of
Patients Before and After Acupressure.These show no significant difference between pain scores of groups in terms of before and
after measurements. So no further statistical analysis is necessary to correct the
effect of initial pain scores. According to the results of our study, pain decreased in
both groups.