| Literature DB >> 30878539 |
Silvia Paciotti1, Federica N Sepe2, Paolo Eusebi2, Lucia Farotti2, Samuela Cataldi2, Leonardo Gatticchi3, Lucilla Parnetti4.
Abstract
The variability of Alzheimer's disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (Aβ42, t-Tau and p-Tau) undermines their full-fledged introduction into routine diagnostics and clinical trials. The introduction of automatic systems can improve the diagnostic performance promoting standardization and reducing the impact of preanalytical and analytical factors. Here we assessed the diagnostic performance of a fully automated chemiluminescent enzyme assay (LUMIPULSE) and compared it with that obtained by using the classical manual enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Patients were clinically diagnosed as AD (n = 42) and non-AD (n = 38). Clinical diagnosis was confirmed at follow-up. LUMIPULSE Aβ42 was reduced in AD (969.4 ± 329.6 pg/mL vs. 1625.9 ± 745.9 pg/mL, p <0.001), whereas LUMIPULSE t-Tau was increased in AD (768.2 ± 281.0 pg/mL vs. 337.5 ± 159.1 pg/mL, p < 0.001) compared to non-AD patients. Both LUMIPULSE Aβ42 (AUC = 0.78, spec. = 0.74, sens. = 0.76) and t-Tau (AUC = 0.94, spec. = 0.93, sens. = 0.87) showed good accuracy in distinguish AD from non-AD and a high correlation with the manual ELISAs (r = 0.87, p < 0.001 and r = 0.92, p < 0.001, respectively). LUMIPULSE improves clinical accuracy in AD diagnosis, promoting the use of standardized values for CSF biomarkers with a good correlation with classical manual assays.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Biomarkers; Cerebrospinal fluid; Pre-analytical factors, automation, ELISAs
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30878539 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.1612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Chim Acta ISSN: 0009-8981 Impact factor: 3.786