Literature DB >> 30878330

Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Leads to Significant Improvement in Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Kyle R Sochacki1, Patrick C McCulloch1, David M Lintner1, Joshua D Harris2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears results in statistically significant and clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes and shoulder range of motion with low graft failure, complication, and reoperation rates.
METHODS: A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies investigating superior capsular reconstruction in adults were included. Animal, cadaveric, and review studies, letters to the editor, and technique papers were excluded. Study methodological quality was analyzed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Shoulder motion and patient-reported outcome scores were analyzed. Statistical significance was defined by P < .05, and clinical significance was defined by the minimal clinically important difference.
RESULTS: Six articles (286 subjects, 292 shoulders, 67.7% males, mean age 63.4 ± 4.1 years, mean follow-up 25.7 ± 14.5 months) were analyzed. The methodological quality was fair (59.7 ± 13.8). Five studies reported significant improvement in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (mean range: 30-55, P < .001 for all). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores significantly improved in 3 studies (mean range: 2.5-5.9, P < .001 for 2 and P = .005 for 1). Shoulder forward flexion (mean range: 28°-56°, P < .001 for 2 and P = .04 for 1) significantly increased in 3 studies. One hundred percent of subjects from 2 studies had clinically significant improvement in ASES and VAS scores and shoulder forward flexion. Thirty-six subjects (14.2% of 254) had graft failure on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Eleven subjects (3.8%) had complications, and 34 (11.7%) underwent reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears results in statistically significant and clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes and shoulder range of motion with low graft failure, complication, and reoperation rates at short-term follow-up in fair-quality studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30878330     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  13 in total

1.  Does arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction using porcine dermal xenograft represent a viable option in case of massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear?

Authors:  Raffaele Garofalo; Alberto Fontanarosa; Angelo De Crescenzo; Marco Conti; Roberto Calbi; Alessandro Castagna
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  [Research progress of treatment for massive rotator cuff tears].

Authors:  Xiaolong Zheng; Kanglai Tang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

3.  Which Factors Influence Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Surgery?

Authors:  Seung-Jun Lee; Suk-Woong Kang; Ilkwon Chung; Hyungseo Jang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-16

4.  Comparison of Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Partial Infraspinatus Repair: A Matched-Pair Analysis of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Stefan Greiner; Max Kaeaeb; Andreas Voss; Robert Lawton; Pushkar Bhide; Leonard Achenbach
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-26

Review 5.  Surgical Options for Failed Rotator Cuff Repair, except Arthroplasty: Review of Current Methods.

Authors:  Jangwoo Kim; Yunki Ryu; Sae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2020-02-21

Review 6.  Clinical Outcomes of Interposition Graft Versus Superior Capsular Reconstruction in Patients With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Baek; Myung Ho Shin; Tae Min Kim; Je Min Im; Kyung-Soo Oh; Seok Won Chung
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-09

7.  Partial Rotator Cuff Repair With Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using the Biceps Tendon Is as Effective as Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using a Tensor Fasciae Latae Autograft in the Treatment of Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Baris Kocaoglu; Goktug Firatli; Tekin Kerem Ulku
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-06-03

8.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings After Superior Capsule Reconstruction.

Authors:  Dale Nicholas Reed; James Tyler Frix; James Mitchell Frix
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-30

Review 9.  Clinical Outcomes of Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review Comparing Acellular Dermal Allograft and Autograft Fascia Lata.

Authors:  Tyler J Smith; Anirudh K Gowd; John Kunkel; Lisa Kaplin; John B Hubbard; Kevin E Coates; Benjamin R Graves; Brian R Waterman
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-27

10.  Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian L Badman; Aaron M Baessler; Molly Moor
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.