Literature DB >> 30878161

Impact of transfer status on real-world outcomes in nonelective cardiac surgery.

Jared P Beller1, Robert B Hawkins1, J Hunter Mehaffey1, William Z Chancellor1, Clifford E Fonner2, Alan M Speir3, Mohammed A Quader4, Jeffrey B Rich5, Leora T Yarboro1, Nicholas R Teman1, Gorav Ailawadi6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transfer from hospital to hospital for cardiac surgery represents a large portion of some clinical practices. Previous literature in other surgical fields has shown worse outcomes for transferred patients. We hypothesized that transferred patients would be higher risk and demonstrate worse outcomes than those admitted through the emergency department.
METHODS: All patients undergoing cardiac operations with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality were evaluated from a multicenter, statewide Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Only patients requiring admission before surgery were included. Patients were stratified by admission through the emergency department or in transfer. Transfers were further stratified by the cardiothoracic surgery capabilities at the referring center.
RESULTS: A total of 13,094 patients met the inclusion criteria of admission before surgery. This included 7582 (57.9%) transfers, of which 502 (6.6%) were referred from cardiac centers. Compared with emergency department admissions, transfers had increased hospital costs despite lower operative risk (Predicted Risk of Mortality 1.5% vs 1.6%, P < .01) and equivalent postoperative morbidity (15.6% vs 15.3% P = .63). In risk-adjusted analysis, transfer status was not independently associated with worse outcomes. Patients transferred from centers that perform cardiac surgery are higher risk than general transfers (Predicted Risk of Mortality 2.5% vs 1.5, P < .01), but specialized care results in excellent risk-adjusted outcomes (observed/expected: mortality 0.81; morbidity or mortality 0.90).
CONCLUSIONS: Transfer patients have similar rates of postoperative complications but increased resource use compared with patients admitted through the emergency department. Patients transferred from centers that perform cardiac surgery represent a particularly high-risk subgroup.
Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult cardiac surgery; health economics (cost analysis, insurance, relative value); management; quality care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30878161      PMCID: PMC6689463          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  25 in total

1.  Inter-Facility Transfer vs. Direct Admission of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Kenji Nakatsuma; Hiroki Shiomi; Takeshi Morimoto; Yutaka Furukawa; Yoshihisa Nakagawa; Kenji Ando; Kazushige Kadota; Takashi Yamamoto; Satoru Suwa; Minoru Horie; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.993

2.  Coronary artery bypass grafting bundled payment proposal will have significant financial impact on hospitals.

Authors:  Robert B Hawkins; J Hunter Mehaffey; Kenan W Yount; Leora T Yarboro; Clifford Fonner; Irving L Kron; Mohammed Quader; Alan Speir; Jeffrey Rich; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Delayed Hospital Discharges of Older Patients: A Systematic Review on Prevalence and Costs.

Authors:  Filipa Landeiro; Kenny Roberts; Alastair Mcintosh Gray; José Leal
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2019-03-14

4.  Surgical Transfer Decision Making: How Regional Resources are Allocated in a Regional Transfer Network.

Authors:  Kristy Kummerow Broman; Michael J Ward; Benjamin K Poulose; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  Preoperative cognitive function predicts survival in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Bart M G Baekelandt; Marianne J Hjermstad; Tom Nordby; Morten W Fagerland; Elin H Kure; Turid Heiberg; Trond Buanes; Knut J Labori
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Access to Quaternary Care Surgery: Implications for Accountable Care Organizations.

Authors:  J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Matthew G Mullen; Max O Meneveau; Bruce Schirmer; Irving L Kron; R Scott Jones; Peter T Hallowell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Complications and surgical outcomes after interhospital transfer vs direct admission in colorectal surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.

Authors:  Stephen P Sharp; Ashar Ata; Brian T Valerian; Jonathan J Canete; A David Chismark; Edward C Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Contemporary Costs Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Gorav Ailawadi; Damien J LaPar; Alan M Speir; Ravi K Ghanta; Leora T Yarboro; Ivan K Crosby; D Scott Lim; Mohammed A Quader; Jeffrey B Rich
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Transfer of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome.

Authors:  Bhuvnesh Aggarwal; Chad Raymond; Jessen Jacob; Damon Kralovic; Kristopher Kormos; David Holloway; Venu Menon
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Delayed discharges at a major arterial centre: a 4-month cross-sectional study at a single specialist vascular surgery ward.

Authors:  J S M Houghton; D Urriza Rodriguez; A R Weale; M J Brooks; D C Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.