S L Andersen1, F B S Briggs2, J H Winnike3, Y Natanzon2, S Maichle4, K J Knagge3, L K Newby5, S G Gregory6. 1. Discovery MS, David H. Murdock Research Institute, 150 Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, United States. 2. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States. 3. Analytical Sciences Laboratory, David H. Murdock Research Institute, 150 Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, United States. 4. Duke Clinical & Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. 5. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States. 6. Discovery MS, David H. Murdock Research Institute, 150 Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, United States; Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, 300 North Duke Street, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, United States. Electronic address: simon.gregory@duke.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic delays are common for multiple sclerosis (MS) since diagnosis typically depends on the presentation of nonspecific clinical symptoms together with radiologically-determined central nervous system (CNS) lesions. It is important to reduce diagnostic delays as earlier initiation of disease modifying therapies mitigates long-term disability. Developing a metabolomic blood-based MS biomarker is attractive, but prior efforts have largely focused on specific subsets of metabolite classes or analytical platforms. Thus, there are opportunities to interrogate metabolite profiles using more expansive and comprehensive approaches for developing MS biomarkers and for advancing our understanding of MS pathogenesis. METHODS: To identify putative blood-based MS biomarkers, we comprehensively interrogated the metabolite profiles in 12 non-Hispanic white, non-smoking, male MS cases who were drug naïve for 3 months prior to biospecimen collection and 13 non-Hispanic white, non-smoking male controls who were frequency matched to cases by age and body mass index. We performed untargeted two-dimensional gas chromatography and time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS) and targeted lipidomic and amino acid analysis on serum. 325 metabolites met quality control and supervised machine learning was used to identify metabolites most informative for MS status. The discrimination potential of these select metabolites were assessed using receiver operator characteristic curves based on logistic models; top candidate metabolites were defined as having area under the curves (AUC) >80%. The associations between whole-genome expression data and the top candidate metabolites were examined, followed by pathway enrichment analyses. Similar associations were examined for 175 putative MS risk variants and the top candidate metabolites. RESULTS: 12 metabolites were determined to be informative for MS status, of which 6 had AUCs >80%: pyroglutamate, laurate, acylcarnitine C14:1, N-methylmaleimide, and 2 phosphatidylcholines (PC ae 40:5, PC ae 42:5). These metabolites participate in glutathione metabolism, fatty acid metabolism/oxidation, cellular membrane composition, and transient receptor potential channel signaling. Pathway analyses based on the gene expression association for each metabolite suggested enrichment for pathways associated with apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction. Interestingly, the predominant MS genetic risk allele HLA-DRB1×15:01 was associated with one of the 6 top metabolites. CONCLUSION: Our analysis represents the most comprehensive description of metabolic changes associated with MS in serum, to date, with the inclusion of genomic and genetic information. We identified atypical metabolic processes that differed between MS patients and controls, which may enable the development of biological targets for diagnosis and treatment.
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic delays are common for multiple sclerosis (MS) since diagnosis typically depends on the presentation of nonspecific clinical symptoms together with radiologically-determined central nervous system (CNS) lesions. It is important to reduce diagnostic delays as earlier initiation of disease modifying therapies mitigates long-term disability. Developing a metabolomic blood-based MS biomarker is attractive, but prior efforts have largely focused on specific subsets of metabolite classes or analytical platforms. Thus, there are opportunities to interrogate metabolite profiles using more expansive and comprehensive approaches for developing MS biomarkers and for advancing our understanding of MS pathogenesis. METHODS: To identify putative blood-based MS biomarkers, we comprehensively interrogated the metabolite profiles in 12 non-Hispanic white, non-smoking, male MS cases who were drug naïve for 3 months prior to biospecimen collection and 13 non-Hispanic white, non-smoking male controls who were frequency matched to cases by age and body mass index. We performed untargeted two-dimensional gas chromatography and time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS) and targeted lipidomic and amino acid analysis on serum. 325 metabolites met quality control and supervised machine learning was used to identify metabolites most informative for MS status. The discrimination potential of these select metabolites were assessed using receiver operator characteristic curves based on logistic models; top candidate metabolites were defined as having area under the curves (AUC) >80%. The associations between whole-genome expression data and the top candidate metabolites were examined, followed by pathway enrichment analyses. Similar associations were examined for 175 putative MS risk variants and the top candidate metabolites. RESULTS: 12 metabolites were determined to be informative for MS status, of which 6 had AUCs >80%: pyroglutamate, laurate, acylcarnitine C14:1, N-methylmaleimide, and 2 phosphatidylcholines (PC ae 40:5, PC ae 42:5). These metabolites participate in glutathione metabolism, fatty acid metabolism/oxidation, cellular membrane composition, and transient receptor potential channel signaling. Pathway analyses based on the gene expression association for each metabolite suggested enrichment for pathways associated with apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction. Interestingly, the predominant MS genetic risk allele HLA-DRB1×15:01 was associated with one of the 6 top metabolites. CONCLUSION: Our analysis represents the most comprehensive description of metabolic changes associated with MS in serum, to date, with the inclusion of genomic and genetic information. We identified atypical metabolic processes that differed between MS patients and controls, which may enable the development of biological targets for diagnosis and treatment.
Authors: Diana M Bautista; Sven-Eric Jordt; Tetsuro Nikai; Pamela R Tsuruda; Andrew J Read; Jeannie Poblete; Ebenezer N Yamoah; Allan I Basbaum; David Julius Journal: Cell Date: 2006-03-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Carolina D Pederzolli; Angela M Sgaravatti; César A Braum; Cristina C Prestes; Giovanni K Zorzi; Mirian B Sgarbi; Angela T S Wyse; Clóvis M D Wannmacher; Moacir Wajner; Carlos S Dutra-Filho Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2007-01-20 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: A Bertolotto; F Gilli; A Sala; M Capobianco; S Malucchi; E Milano; F Melis; F Marnetto; R L P Lindberg; R Bottero; A Di Sapio; M T Giordana Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-02-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Monika A Myszczynska; Poojitha N Ojamies; Alix M B Lacoste; Daniel Neil; Amir Saffari; Richard Mead; Guillaume M Hautbergue; Joanna D Holbrook; Laura Ferraiuolo Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Ferdinanda Annesi; Sonia Hermoso-Durán; Bruno Rizzuti; Rosalinda Bruno; Domenico Pirritano; Alfredo Petrone; Francesco Del Giudice; Jorge Ojeda; Sonia Vega; Oscar Sanchez-Gracia; Adrian Velazquez-Campoy; Olga Abian; Rita Guzzi Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2021-04-13
Authors: Kathryn C Fitzgerald; Matthew D Smith; Sol Kim; Elias S Sotirchos; Michael D Kornberg; Morgan Douglas; Bardia Nourbakhsh; Jennifer Graves; Ramandeep Rattan; Laila Poisson; Mirela Cerghet; Ellen M Mowry; Emmanuelle Waubant; Shailendra Giri; Peter A Calabresi; Pavan Bhargava Journal: Cell Rep Med Date: 2021-10-19
Authors: Sara Andrade; Tiago Morais; Ionel Sandovici; Alexandre L Seabra; Miguel Constância; Mariana P Monteiro Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 5.555