Literature DB >> 30877778

The Epistemology of Cognitive Enhancement.

J Adam Carter1, Duncan Pritchard2.   

Abstract

A common epistemological assumption in contemporary bioethics held by both proponents and critics of nontraditional forms of cognitive enhancement is that cognitive enhancement aims at the facilitation of the accumulation of human knowledge. This article does three central things. First, drawing from recent work in epistemology, a rival account of cognitive enhancement, framed in terms of the notion of cognitive achievement rather than knowledge, is proposed. Second, we outline and respond to an axiological objection to our proposal that draws from recent work by Leon Kass (2004), Michael Sandel (2009), and John Harris (2011) to the effect that "enhanced" cognitive achievements are (by effectively removing obstacles to success) not worthy of pursuit or are otherwise "trivial". Third, we show how the cognitive achievement account of cognitive enhancement proposed here fits snugly with recent active externalist approaches (e.g., extended cognition) in the philosophy of mind and cognitive science.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 bioethicszzm321990 ; zzm321990 cognitive achievementzzm321990 ; zzm321990 cognitive enhancementzzm321990 ; zzm321990 epistemic valuezzm321990 ; zzm321990 knowledgezzm321990

Year:  2019        PMID: 30877778     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhy040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  2 in total

1.  Socially Extended Scientific Knowledge.

Authors:  Duncan Pritchard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  Can self-validating neuroenhancement be autonomous?

Authors:  Jukka Varelius
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2020-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.