Literature DB >> 30877696

Transient and Adult Patients with Neurologic Diseases in the Pediatric Emergency Department: Trends and Characteristics.

Ji Hoon Na1, Young Mock Lee1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: There is an increasing rate of presentations by transient and adult patients (TAPs) to pediatric emergency departments (PED-EDs). TAPs with neurologic diseases (N-TAPs) comprise most of these patients. We investigated this trend and compared the characteristics of N-TAPs with those of pediatric patients with neurologic diseases (N-PEDs) who presented to the PED-ED of a tertiary-care hospital in Korea.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of neurologic patients who presented to the PED-ED of a single tertiary-care hospital from 2013 to 2017. We included patients with neurologic symptoms or diseases and those who were treated in the pediatric neurology department and underwent neurologic evaluations and treatment in the PED-ED.
RESULTS: Presentations by N-TAPs to the PED-ED increased over time, whereas the number of N-PEDs gradually decreased, with a significant difference between the groups (p<0.001). The number of N-TAPs who presented to the PED-ED almost tripled from 2013 to 2017. N-TAPs had significantly more acute symptoms than N-PEDs, and a significantly higher proportion of N-TAPs were insured by Medical Aid compared to N-PEDs (p<0.001). The admission rate was significantly higher (p<0.001) and the mean hospital stay was longer (p=0.046) for N-TAPs. Epilepsy and neurometabolic diseases were mainly responsible for the increased presentations by N-TAPs.
CONCLUSIONS: We have clarified the status of N-TAPs in the PED-ER and the role of pediatric neurologists who manage them. Multidisciplinary treatments focusing on the role of pediatric neurologists should be developed to that systematic long-term care plans are applied to N-TAPs.
Copyright © 2019 Korean Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult; emergency department; neurologic patient; pediatric neurology; pediatrics; transient

Year:  2019        PMID: 30877696      PMCID: PMC6444142          DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2019.15.2.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurol        ISSN: 1738-6586            Impact factor:   3.077


INTRODUCTION

Pediatric emergency departments (PED-EDs) are mainly visited by pediatric patients younger than 18 years who have a variety of ailments. However, at tertiary medical institutions where subspecialties are well established, transient patients (age, 18–21 years) and adult patients (older than 21 years) often also present to the PED-ED.12 Most of these patients are diagnosed with chronic refractory pediatric diseases during childhood and so have often received treatment in pediatric departments.123 Transient and adult patients (TAPs) present to the PED-ED because they are accustomed to receiving treatment for their long-term diseases that developed during childhood in such a department.4 Because these patients are older than 18 years, it would seem that they should be treated in the adult emergency department instead. However, because they wish to continue receiving care in a familiar setting, TAPs with refractory pediatric diseases often present to the PED-ED in emergency situations.5678 The proportion of TAPs examined in pediatric departments is particularly high in the neurology, hematology-oncology, cardiology, and genetics areas.9 This is due to many diseases being first treated in these departments during childhood, and the clinical progression of these diseases tends to be chronic and complex.91011 Additionally, because these diseases begin during childhood, continuing developmental and emotional interventions by medical staff in these departments are important for TAPs and should be maintained even after they become older.1212 Disease etiologies are often genetic in the pediatric neurologic area, and the course of these diseases can significantly impact their outcomes. TAPs with neurologic diseases (N-TAPs) often present to the PED-ED, and so pediatric neurologists need to be prepared to treat them.10 Some studies have investigated TAPs presenting to the PED-ED, but they have produced few data.23 Furthermore, epidemiologic studies of N-TAPs presenting to PED-EDs are even less common.156 Pediatric neurologists need to understand the characteristics of N-TAPs in order to be able to provide them with the best medical management. We investigated the characteristics of N-TAPs and pediatric patients with neurologic diseases (N-PEDs) who presented to the PED-ED of a tertiary-care hospital in Korea.

METHODS

Inclusion of patients and data collection

This was a retrospective study conducted using data from the PED-ED of a single tertiary-care center (Gangnam Severance Hospital). We reviewed the medical records of 34,439 patients who presented to the PED-ED from 2013 to 2017. We then selected patients with neurologic symptoms and those who had been treated in the pediatric neurology department and subsequently underwent neurologic evaluations and treatment in the PED-ED. This study enrolled 2,315 patients, with patients younger than 18 years categorized as N-PEDs and those 18 years or older categorized as N-TAPs. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gangnam Severance Hospital, and all study participants provided informed consent (approval no. 3-2017-0263).

Study design: subgroup analyses

The primary goal of this study was to compare N-TAPs and N-PEDs. We analyzed certain subgroups of N-TAPs and N-PEDs and made comparisons between admitted and discharged N-TAPs and N-PEDs in order to identify the patient characteristics associated with hospitalizations and discharges.

Demographics and variables used in the analysis

The medical records of N-TAPs and N-PEDs were examined carefully. Patient demographics and variables such as age, sex, time of presentation (year), route of entry to the PED-ED, main symptom, severity level, main diagnosis at the time of the presentation, hospitalization status, and insurance status were identified. We used the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) to quantify the severity levels of the patients.13 Triage severity was defined by the following KTAS scores: 1) need for resuscitation, 2) emergency, 3) urgent, 4) less urgent, and 5) nonurgent. We classified the patients into two groups (neurologic and systemic) based on the diagnosis that was most relevant to their health status at the time of presenting to the PED-ED. There are several types of health-care insurance in South Korea, including the National Health Insurance Service, which covers almost the entire population, and Medical Aid, which is a public assistance program for poor or physically disabled individuals.1415 We therefore also investigated the distribution of medical insurance types among the neurologic patients who presented to the PED-ED.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS (version 20.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The descriptive statistics included means, standard deviations, medians, and ranges. The chisquare test, Fisher's exact test, and parametric t tests were used to evaluate differences between groups, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics of neurologic patients who presented to the PED-ED

Table 1 presents the clinical characteristics of the 2,315 neurologic patients who presented to the PED-ED from 2013 to 2017. Patients aged 2 to 5 years accounted for the largest proportion (32.9%), and N-TAPs accounted for 2.4% of all patients. The median age of the patients was 5 years (range, birth to 41 years). The sex ratio was 58.1:41.9 (males:females). The total number of patients who presented to the PED-ED during the 5-year observation period decreased over time. Direct presentations were the most frequent method of entry to the PED-ED (90.0%). Febrile seizures, headaches, and afebrile seizures were the main symptoms (80.8%) for all patients. The most-frequent severity level was grade 3 (n=1,713, 74.0%), and the severity levels of the patients conformed to a normal distribution.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of neurologic patients who presented to the PED-ED from 2013 to 2017

CharacteristicTotal (n=2,315)
Age distribution, year(s)
 0–1529 (22.9)
 2–5761 (32.9)
 6–12665 (28.7)
 13–17305 (13.1)
 ≥1855 (2.4)
Age, years5.0 [0–41], 10.8±9.9
Age range, years
 N-PEDs, <182,260 (97.6)
 N-TAPs, ≥1855 (2.4)
Sex, males:females1,345:970 (58.1:41.9)
Time of presentation
 2013637 (27.5)
 2014512 (22.1)
 2015444 (19.2)
 2016335 (14.5)
 2017387 (16.7)
Route of entry
 Direct presentation2,084 (90.0)
 Referred from outpatient clinic92 (4.0)
 Transferred139 (6.3)
Main symptom(s)
 Febrile seizure560 (24.2)
 Headache508 (21.9)
 Fever437 (18.9)
 Afebrile seizure365 (15.8)
 Nausea/vomiting96 (4.1)
 General weakness/poor oral intake/lethargy74 (3.2)
 Dyspnea50 (2.2)
 Cough/sputum49 (2.1)
 Mental change38 (1.6)
 Dizziness/syncope33 (1.4)
 Emergency situation (CPR/status epilepticus/drug intoxication)24 (1.0)
 Gait disturbance19 (0.8)
 Diarrhea14 (0.6)
 Abdominal pain14 (0.6)
 Allergy/skin lesion8 (0.3)
 Facial asymmetry8 (0.3)
 Gastrointestinal bleeding5 (0.2)
 Constipation/ileus2 (0.1)
 Other11 (0.5)
Severity level, KTAS score
 1 (need for resuscitation)29 (1.3)
 2 (emergency)246 (10.6)
 3 (urgent)1,713 (74.0)
 4 (less urgent)321 (13.9)
 5 (nonurgent)6 (0.3)
Main diagnosis
 Neurologic diagnosis group1,801 (77.8)
  Epilepsy393 (17.0)
  Febrile seizure605 (26.1)
  Meningitis550 (23.8)
  Encephalitis34 (1.5)
  Migraine66 (2.9)
  Metabolic encephalopathy127 (5.5)
  Myopathy15 (0.6)
  Peripheral neuropathy11 (0.5)
 Systemic diagnosis group514 (22.2)
  Sepsis50 (2.2)
  Lower respiratory infection99 (4.3)
  Upper respiratory infection193 (8.3)
  Viral infection25 (1.1)
  Acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis/asthma/croup20 (0.9)
  Acute gastroenteritis/ileus/intussusception88 (3.8)
  Urticaria9 (0.4)
  Other30 (1.3)
Admission1,147 (49.5)
Insurance
 National Health Insurance Service2,199 (95.0)
 Medical Aid program99 (4.3)
 International health insurance9 (0.4)
 Other8 (0.3)

Data are n (%), mean±standard-deviation, or median [range] values.

CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, KTAS: Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, N-PEDs: pediatric patients with neurologic diseases, N-TAPs: transient and adult patients with neurologic diseases, PED-ED: pediatric emergency department.

The neurologic diagnosis group (n=1,801, 77.8%) comprised patients with febrile seizures (n=605, 26.1%), meningitis (n=550, 23.8%), epilepsy (n=393, 17.0%), and other symptoms. Upper respiratory infections (n=193, 8.3%), lower respiratory infections (n=99, 4.3%), acute gastroenteritis/ileus/intussusception (n=88, 3.8%), and sepsis (n=50, 2.2%) were the main diagnoses for those in the systemic diagnosis group (n=514, 22.2%). The hospitalization rate for patients who presented to the PED-ED was 49.5%, and most of them were insured by the National Health Insurance Service (n=2,199, 95.0%).

Characteristics of neurologic patients in the PED-ED: admission and discharge

Of all the patients, 1,147 were hospitalized and 1,168 were discharged (Table 2). The annual age distribution differed significantly between the admission and discharge groups (p<0.001). N-TAPs were represented more in the admission group. The annual decrease in the number of patients was significantly larger in the admission group than in the discharge group (p<0.001). The distribution of the route of entry to the PED-ED differed significantly between the admission and discharge groups, with more patients referred from outpatient clinics or transferred from other locations in the admission group. The main symptoms also differed significantly between the two groups, with severity levels of 1 (need for resuscitation) and 2 (emergency) being significantly more common in the admission group than in the discharge group. A systemic diagnosis as the primary diagnosis was also significantly more common in the admission group than in the discharge group (31.6% vs. 12.9%, p<0.001). The proportion of patients who received insurance through the Medical Aid program was significantly higher in the admission group than in the discharge group (p<0.001).
Table 2

Comparison of clinical characteristics between admitted and discharged neurologic patients presenting to the PED-ED

CharacteristicAdmission (n=1,147)Discharge (n=1,168)p
Age distribution, year(s)<0.001
 0–1268 (23.4)261 (22.3)
 2–5363 (21.6)398 (34.1)
 6–12330 (28.8)335 (28.7)
 13–17138 (12.0)167 (14.3)
 ≥1848 (4.2)7 (0.6)
Age, years5.0 [0–41], 6.4±5.84.0 [0–34], 6.0±5.0<0.001
Age range, years<0.001
 N-PEDs, <181,099 (95.8)1,161 (99.4)
 N-TAPs, ≥1848 (4.2)7 (0.6)
Sex, males:females651:496 (56.8:43.2)694:474 (59.4:40.6)0.206
Time of presentation<0.001
 2013381 (33.2)256 (21.9)
 2014246 (21.4)226 (22.8)
 2015210 (18.3)234 (20.0)
 2016154 (13.4)181 (15.5)
 2017156 (13.6)231 (19.8)
Route of entry<0.001
 Direct presentation968 (84.4)1,116 (95.5)
 Referred from outpatient clinic85 (7.4)7 (0.6)
 Transferred94 (8.2)45 (3.9)
Main symptoms
 Febrile seizure149 (13.0)411 (35.2)<0.001
 Headache186 (16.2)322 (27.6)<0.001
 Fever282 (24.6)155 (13.3)<0.001
 Afebrile seizure216 (18.8)149 (12.8)<0.001
 Nausea/vomiting59 (5.1)37 (3.2)0.021
 General weakness/poor oral intake/lethargy53 (4.6)21 (1.8)<0.001
 Dyspnea38 (3.3)12 (1.0)<0.001
 Cough/sputum44 (3.8)5 (0.4)<0.001
 Mental change21 (1.8)17 (1.5)0.516
 Dizziness/syncope7 (0.6)26 (2.2)0.001
 Emergency situation (CPR/status epilepticus/drug intoxication)23 (2.0)1 (0.1)0.001
 Gait disturbance18 (1.6)1 (0.1)<0.001
 Diarrhea14 (1.2)0 (0)<0.001
 Abdominal pain11 (1.0)3 (0.3)0.033
 Allergy/skin lesion7 (0.6)1 (0.1)0.037
 Facial asymmetry3 (0.3)5 (0.4)0.726
 Gastrointestinal bleeding5 (0.4)0 (0)0.030
 Constipation/ileus2 (0.2)0 (0)0.245
 Other9 (0.8)2 (0.2)0.037
Severity level, KTAS score<0.001
 1 (need for resuscitation)28 (2.4)1 (0.1)
 2 (emergency)240 (20.9)6 (0.5)
 3 (urgent)817 (71.2)896 (76.7)
 4 (less urgent)59 (5.1)262 (22.4)
 5 (nonurgent)3 (0.3)3 (0.3)
Main diagnoses
 Neurologic diagnosis group784 (68.4)1017 (87.1)<0.001
  Epilepsy249 (21.7)144 (12.3)<0.001
  Febrile seizure141 (12.3)464 (39.7)<0.001
  Meningitis233 (20.3)317 (27.1)<0.001
  Encephalitis33 (2.9)1 (0.1)<0.001
  Migraine7 (0.6)59 (5.1)<0.001
  Metabolic encephalopathy105 (9.2)22 (1.9)<0.001
  Myopathy10 (0.9)5 (0.4)0.205
  Peripheral neuropathy6 (0.5)5 (0.4)0.772
 Systemic diagnosis group363 (31.6)151 (12.9)<0.001
  Sepsis49 (4.3)1 (0.1)<0.001
  Lower respiratory infection94 (8.2)5 (0.4)<0.001
  Upper respiratory infection72 (6.3)121 (10.4)<0.001
  Viral infection22 (1.9)3 (0.3)<0.001
  Acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis/asthma/croup18 (1.6)2 (0.2)<0.001
  Acute gastroenteritis/ileus/intussusception77 (6.7)11 (0.9)<0.001
  Urticaria7 (0.6)2 (0.2)0.106
  Other24 (2.1)6 (0.5)0.001
Insurance
 National Health Insurance Service1,066 (92.9)1,133 (97.0)<0.001
 Medical Aid program75 (6.6)24 (2.1)<0.001
 International health insurance4 (0.3)5 (0.4)0.759
 Other2 (0.2)6 (0.5)0.288

Data are n (%), mean±standard-deviation, or median [range] values.

CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, KTAS: Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, N-PEDs: pediatric patients with neurologic diseases, N-TAPs: transient and adult patients with neurologic diseases, PED-ED: pediatric emergency department.

Characteristics of neurologic patients in the PED-ED: N-TAPs and N-PEDs

The proportion of boys was significantly higher in the N-TAP group than in the N-PED group (76.4% vs. 57.7%, p=0.005) (Table 3). Presentations to the PED-ED by N-TAPs increased over time, whereas those by N-PEDs gradually decreased, with a significant difference between the groups (p<0.001) (Fig. 1). In particular, presentations by N-TAPs almost tripled from 2013 to 2017. The severity level was higher and the main symptoms were more severe in N-TAPs than in N-PEDs. The severe main symptoms comprised afebrile seizures, general weakness, poor oral intake, lethargy, and other emergency situations. The proportion of patients with febrile seizures, headaches, and seizures was significantly higher for N-PEDs. No N-TAPs had a KTAS severity score of 4 or 5 (Fig. 2). N-TAPs seemed to be more likely than N-PEDs to have underlying primary neurologic diagnoses, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.087). Epilepsy and metabolic disease were significantly more common among N-TAPS than among N-PEDs (p<0.001 for both), while febrile seizures and meningitis were significantly more common among N-PEDs (p<0.001 for both). The proportion of patients insured by the Medical Aid program was significantly higher among N-TAPs than among N-PEDs (p<0.001). The admission rate was higher (p<0.001) and the mean length of hospital stay was longer (p=0.046) for N-TAPs than for N-PEDs.
Table 3

Comparison of the clinical characteristics of N-TAPs and N-PEDs presenting to the PED-ED

CharacteristicN-TAPs (n=55)N-PEDs (n=2,260)p
Age, years21 [18–41], 22.4±5.74 [0–17], 5.8±4.8<0.001
Sex, males:females42:13 (76.4:23.6)1,303:957 (57.7:42.3)0.005
Time of presentation<0.001
 20137 (12.7)630 (27.9)
 20145 (9.1)507 (22.4)
 201510 (18.2)434 (19.2)
 201614 (25.5)321 (14.2)
 201719 (34.5)368 (16.3)
Route of entry0.513
 Direct presentation47 (85.5)2,037 (90.1)
 Referred from outpatient clinic3 (5.5)89 (3.9)
 Transferred5 (9.1)134 (5.9)
Main symptoms
 Febrile seizure0 (0.0)560 (24.8)<0.001
 Headache1 (1.8)507 (22.4)<0.001
 Fever2 (3.6)435 (19.2)0.001
 Afebrile seizure20 (36.4)345 (15.3)<0.001
 Nausea/vomiting1 (1.8)95 (4.2)0.523
 General weakness/poor oral intake/lethargy12 (21.8)62 (2.7)<0.001
 Dyspnea3 (5.5)47 (2.1)0.114
 Cough/sputum1 (1.8)48 (2.1)0.683
 Mental change3 (5.5)35 (1.5)0.060
 Dizziness/syncope0 (0.0)33 (1.5)0.450
 Emergency situation (CPR/status epilepticus/drug intoxication)7 (12.7)17 (0.8)<0.001
 Gait disturbance2 (3.6)17 (0.8)0.073
 Diarrhea1 (1.8)13 (0.6)0.287
 Abdominal pain0 (0.0)14 (0.6)0.713
 Allergy/skin lesion0 (0.0)8 (0.4)0.825
 Facial asymmetry0 (0.0)8 (0.4)0.825
 Gastrointestinal bleeding2 (3.6)3 (0.1)0.005
 Constipation/ileus0 (0.0)2 (0.1)0.953
 Other0 (0.0)11 (0.5)0.767
Severity level, KTAS score<0.001
 1 (need for resuscitation)12 (21.8)17 (0.8)
 2 (emergency)27 (49.1)219 (9.7)
 3 (urgent)16 (29.1)1,697 (75.1)
 4 (less urgent)0 (0.0)321 (14.1)
 5 (nonurgent)0 (0.0)6 (0.3)
Main diagnoses
 Neurologic diagnosis group48 (87.3)1,753 (77.6)0.087
  Epilepsy26 (47.3)367 (16.2)<0.001
  Febrile seizure0 (0.0)605 (26.8)<0.001
  Meningitis3 (5.5)547 (24.2)0.004
  Encephalitis0 (0.0)34 (1.5)0.439
  Migraine1 (1.8)65 (2.9)0.530
  Metabolic encephalopathy13 (23.6)114 (5.0)<0.001
  Myopathy5 (9.1)10 (0.4)<0.001
  Peripheral neuropathy0 (0.0)11 (0.5)0.767
 Systemic diagnosis group7 (12.7)507 (22.4)0.087
  Sepsis3 (5.5)47 (2.1)0.110
  Lower respiratory infection0 (0.0)99 (4.4)0.171
  Upper respiratory infection1 (1.8)192 (8.5)0.125
  Viral infection0 (0.0)25 (1.1)0.546
  Acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis/asthma/croup0 (0.0)20 (0.9)0.617
  Acute gastroenteritis/ileus/intussusception2 (3.6)86 (3.8)0.652
  Urticaria1 (1.8)8 (0.4)0.195
  Other0 (0.0)30 (1.3)0.484
Insurance
 National Health Insurance Service45 (81.8)2,154 (95.3)<0.001
 Medical Aid program9 (16.4)90 (4.0)<0.001
 International health insurance0 (0.0)9 (0.4)0.805
 Other1 (1.8)7 (0.3)0.175
Admission48 (87.3)1,099 (48.6)<0.001
Days of admission15.8±33.65.9±12.20.046
95% confidence interval0.2 to 19.5

Data are n (%), mean±standard-deviation, or median [range] values.

CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, KTAS: Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, N-PEDs: pediatric patients with neurologic diseases, N-TAPs: transient and adult patients with neurologic diseases, PED-ED: pediatric emergency department.

Fig. 1

Changing rates of N-TAPs and N-PEDs presenting to the PED-ED. Yearly changes in the numbers of N-TAPs, N-PEDs, neurologic patients, and total patients in the PED-ED. A: The number of N-TAPs steadily increased, and the proportion of N-TAPs presenting to the PED-ED more than quadrupled from 2013 to 2017. B: Unlike N-TAPs, the proportion of N-PEDs presenting to the PED-ED is steadily declining. C: Yearly changes in neurologic patients presenting to the PED-ED (both N-TAPs and N-PEDs). Neurologic patients presenting to the PED-ED show a gradually declining trend. D: Annual change in total patients presenting to the PED-ED. The total number of PED-ED patients is declining. N-PEDs: pediatric patients with neurologic diseases, N-TAPs: transient and adult patients with neurologic diseases, PED-ED: pediatric emergency department.

Fig. 2

Difference in severity levels (KTAS scores) between N-TAPs and N-PEDs. Comparison of the severity of disease in N-TAPs and N-PEDs based on KTAS scores. A: Severity distribution for N-TAPs presenting to the PED-ED. B: Severity distribution for N-TAPs presenting to the PED-ED. Overall, the N-TAPs presenting to the PED-ED had a higher severity level. The distributions in (A) and (B) were statistically significant. KTAS: Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, N-PEDs: pediatric patients with neurologic diseases, N-TAPs: transient and adult patients with neurologic diseases, PED-ED: pediatric emergency department.

Characteristics of N-TAPs presenting to the PED-ED: admission and discharge

There were 55 N-TAPs, of which 48 were in the admission group and 7 were in the discharge group (Table 4). The proportion of boys was much higher in the admission group than in the discharge group (81.3% vs. 42.9%, p=0.046). The route of entry or main symptom did not differ significantly between the two N-TAPs groups. However, there was a significant intergroup difference (p=0.02) in the distribution of severity levels, with 25% of those in the admission group requiring resuscitation. However, no patient in either group had a severity level of 4 or 5. There was no statistically significant difference in the main diagnosis or insurance status between the two groups.
Table 4

Comparison of clinical characteristics of admitted and discharged N-TAPs presenting to the PED-ED

CharacteristicAdmission (n=48)Discharge (n=7)p
Sex, males:females39:9 (81.3:18.8)3:4 (42.9:57.1)0.046
Time of presentation0.107
 20136 (12.5)1 (14.3)
 20145 (10.4)0 (0.0)
 201510 (20.8)0 (0.0)
 201614 (29.2)0 (0.0)
 201713 (27.1)6 (85.7)
Route of entry0.531
 Direct presentation41 (85.4)6 (85.7)
 Referred from outpatient clinic3 (6.3)0 (0.0)
 Transferred4 (8.3)1 (14.3)
Main symptoms
 Afebrile seizure16 (33.3)4 (57.1)0.242
 General weakness/poor oral intake/lethargy10 (20.8)2 (28.6)0.639
 Emergency situation (CPR/status epilepticus/drug intoxication)7 (14.6)0 (0.0)0.577
 Mental change3 (6.3)0 (0.0)0.659
 Dyspnea3 (6.3)0 (0.0)0.659
 Fever2 (4.2)0 (0.0)0.760
 Gait disturbance2 (4.2)0 (0.0)0.760
 Gastrointestinal bleeding2 (4.2)0 (0.0)0.760
 Headache1 (2.1)0 (0.0)0.873
 Cough/sputum1 (2.1)0 (0.0)0.873
 Diarrhea1 (2.1)0 (0.0)0.873
 Nausea/vomiting0 (0.0)1 (14.3)0.127
 Other0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
Severity level, KTAS score0.020
 1 (need for resuscitation)12 (25.0)0 (0.0)
 2 (emergency)25 (52.1)2 (28.6)
 3 (urgent)11 (22.9)5 (71.4)
 4 (less urgent)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
 5 (nonurgent)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Main diagnoses
 Neurologic diagnosis group42 (87.5)6 (85.7)0.637
  Epilepsy21 (43.8)5 (71.4)0.236
  Febrile seizure0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
  Meningitis3 (6.3)0 (0.0)0.659
  Encephalitis0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
  Migraine1 (2.1)0 (0.0)0.873
  Metabolic encephalopathy13 (27.1)0 (0.0)0.179
  Myopathy4 (8.3)1 (14.3)0.508
  Peripheral neuropathy0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
 Systemic diagnosis group6 (12.5)1 (14.3)0.637
  Sepsis3 (6.3)0 (0.0)0.659
  Lower respiratory infection0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
  Upper respiratory infection1 (2.1)0 (0.0)0.873
  Viral infection0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
  Acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis/asthma/croup0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
  Acute gastroenteritis/ileus/intussusception2 (4.2)0 (0.0)0.760
  Urticaria0 (0.0)1 (14.3)0.127
  Other0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
Insurance
 National Health Insurance Service39 (81.3)6 (85.7)0.625
 Medical Aid program8 (16.6)1 (14.3)0.679
 International health insurance0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
 Other1 (2.1)0 (0.0)0.873

Data are n (%) values.

CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, KTAS: Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, N-TAPs: transient and adult patients with neurologic diseases, PED-ED: pediatric emergency department.

Characteristics of N-PEDs presenting to the PED-ED: admission and discharge

The age distribution of N-PEDs was statistically identical in the admission and discharge groups during the 5-year study period (Table 5). The numbers of patients in both groups decreased over time, with the decrease being significantly greater in the admission group than in the discharge group (p<0.001). Regarding the route of entry to the PED-ED, being referred from outpatient clinics or transferred from other locations was significantly more common in the admission group (p<0.001).
Table 5

Comparison of clinical characteristics of admitted and discharged N-PEDs presenting to the PED-ED

CharacteristicAdmission (n=1,099)Discharge (n=1,161)p
Age distribution, year(s)0.424
 0–1268 (24.4)261 (22.5)
 2–5363 (33.0)398 (34.3)
 6–12330 (30.0)335 (28.9)
 13–17138 (12.6)167 (14.4)
Age, years5 [0–17], 5.7±4.74 [0–17], 5.9±4.80.351
Sex, males:females612:487 (55.7:44.3)691:470 (59.5:40.5)0.065
Time of presentation<0.001
 2013375 (34.1)255 (22.0)
 2014241 (21.9)266 (22.9)
 2015200 (18.2)234 (20.2)
 2016140 (12.7)181 (15.6)
 2017143 (13.0)225 (19.4)
Route of entry<0.001
 Direct presentation927 (84.3)1,110 (95.6)
 Referred from outpatient clinic82 (7.5)7 (0.6)
 Transferred90 (8.2)44 (3.8)
Main symptoms
 Febrile seizure149 (13.6)411 (35.4)<0.001
 Headache185 (16.8)322 (27.7)<0.001
 Fever280 (25.5)155 (13.4)<0.001
 Afebrile seizure200 (18.2)145 (12.5)<0.001
 Nausea/vomiting59 (5.4)36 (3.1)0.008
 General weakness/poor oral intake/lethargy43 (3.9)19 (1.6)0.001
 Dyspnea35 (3.2)12 (1.0)<0.001
 Cough/sputum43 (3.9)5 (0.4)<0.001
 Mental change18 (1.6)17 (1.5)0.865
 Dizziness/syncope7 (0.6)26 (2.2)0.001
 Emergency situation (CPR/status epilepticus/drug intoxication)16 (1.5)1 (0.1)<0.001
 Gait disturbance16 (1.5)1 (0.1)<0.001
 Diarrhea13 (1.2)0 (0.0)<0.001
 Abdominal pain11 (1.0)3 (0.3)0.031
 Allergy7 (0.6)1 (0.1)0.034
 Facial asymmetry3 (0.3)5 (0.4)0.727
 Gastrointestinal bleeding3 (0.3)0 (0.0)0.115
 Constipation/ileus2 (0.2)0 (0.0)0.236
 Other9 (0.8)2 (0.2)0.034
Severity level, KTAS score<0.001
 1 (need for resuscitation)16 (1.5)1 (0.1)
 2 (emergency)215 (19.6)4 (0.3)
 3 (urgent)806 (73.3)891 (76.7)
 4 (less urgent)59 (5.4)262 (22.6)
 5 (nonurgent)3 (0.3)3 (0.3)
Main diagnoses
 Neurologic diagnosis grou742 (67.5)1,011 (87.1)<0.001
  Epilepsy228 (20.7)139 (12.0)<0.001
  Febrile seizure141 (12.8)464 (40.0)<0.001
  Meningitis230 (20.9)317 (27.3)<0.001
  Encephalitis33 (3.0)1 (0.1)<0.001
  Migraine6 (0.5)59 (5.1)<0.001
  Metabolic encephalopathy92 (8.4)22 (1.9)<0.001
  Myopathy6 (0.5)4 (0.3)0.538
  Peripheral neuropathy6 (0.5)5 (0.4)0.769
 Systemic diagnosis group357 (32.5)150 (12.9)<0.001
  Sepsis46 (4.2)1 (0.1)<0.001
  Lower respiratory infection94 (8.6)5 (0.4)<0.001
  Upper respiratory infection71 (6.5)121 (10.4)<0.001
  Viral infection22 (2.0)3 (0.3)<0.001
  Acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis/asthma/croup18 (1.6)2 (0.2)<0.001
  Acute gastroenteritis/ileus/intussusception75 (6.8)11 (0.9)<0.001
  Urticaria7 (0.6)1 (0.1)0.034
  Other24 (2.2)6 (0.5)0.001
Insurance
 National Health Insurance Service1,027 (93.4)1,127 (97.1)<0.001
 Medical Aid program67 (6.1)23 (2.0)<0.001
 International health insurance4 (0.4)5 (0.4)0.534
 Other1 (0.1)6 (0.5)0.125

Data are n (%), mean±standard-deviation, or median [range] values.

CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, KTAS: Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, N-PEDs: pediatric patients with neurologic diseases, PED-ED: pediatric emergency department.

In terms of the main symptoms, there were significantly more patients with fevers, afebrile seizures, and nausea/vomiting in the admission group than in the discharge group, whereas febrile seizures, headaches, and dizziness/syncope were significantly more common in the discharge group. The proportion of patients with severity levels of 1 and 2 was significantly higher in the admission group (p<0.001). There was a strong tendency for the underlying systemic diagnosis to be the main symptom in the admission group, and these patients generally had a larger number of separate diagnoses compared to those in the discharge group. Significantly more patients in the admission group were insured by Medical Aid (p<0.001).

Underlying diagnoses of N-TAPs in the PED-ED

There were 6 diagnoses among the 55 N-TAPs who presented to the PED-ED during the 5-year study period (Table 6): epilepsy, neurometabolic diseases, muscular dystrophy, spinal atrophy, meningitis, and migraine. Epilepsy was the mostcommon condition (n=26, 47.3%), followed by neurometabolic disease (n=17, 30.9%). The cause of symptoms was known for 12 patients in the epilepsy group: complications of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (n=6, 10.9%), central nervous system infection (n=3, 5.5%), and central nervous system malformation (n=3, 5.5%); the causes of symptoms were unknown for the other 14 patients. In the neurometabolic disease group, mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (n=7, 12.7%), Leigh syndrome (n=3, 5.5%), and Kearns-Sayre syndrome (n=1, 1.8%) accounted for most of the diagnoses, with the cause being unknown for 14 patients in the neurometabolic category.
Table 6

Underlying diagnoses of N-TAPs who presented to the PED-ED from 2013 to 2017

Characteristic20132014201520162017Total
Epilepsy4346926 (47.3)
 With hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy001236 (10.9)
 With CNS infection000213 (5.5)
 With CNS malformation010113 (5.5)
 Unknown etiology4231414 (25.5)
Neurometabolic disease3034717 (30.9)
 MELAS201117 (12.7)
 Leigh syndrome000123 (5.5)
 Kearns-Sayre syndrome000011 (1.8)
 Unknown102236 (10.9)
Muscular dystrophy011125 (9.1)
Spinal muscular atrophy002013 (5.5)
Meningitis000303 (5.5)
Migraine010001 (1.8)
Total7510141955 (100.0)

Data are n (%) values.

CNS: central nervous system, MELAS: mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes, N-TAPs: transient and adult patients with neurologic diseases, PED-ED: pediatric emergency department.

DISCUSSION

Several previous studies have found that TAPs comprise 0.9–4.0% of all patients presenting to the PED-ED, and that their numbers and proportions are increasing.2391116171819 Some studies have shown that the underlying diseases of TAPs are becoming increasingly diverse.39 However, few studies have investigated the trends and characteristics of N-TAPs, who represent a major proportion of the patients presenting to the PED-ED. The present study was prompted by pediatric neurologists noticing some changes in the number of N-TAPs who presented to the PED-ED while they were undergoing medical care, and so we investigated some of these changes and the characteristics of these patients. The number of PED-ED presentations by N-TAPs steadily increased during the 5-year study period. There was a three-fold increase in the number and a nearly fourfold increase in the proportion of N-TAPs presenting to the PED-ED from 2013 to 2017 (Fig. 1A and B). This could have been due to differences in medical situations, including differences in the most-abundant subgroup of TAPs presenting to the PED-ED. However, there is a growing body of evidence that N-TAPs have a major effect on the overall number of TAPs presenting to the PED-ED.91216 This should be important to pediatric neurologists due to increasing numbers and proportions of N-TAPs presenting to the PED-ED. However, the decreased number of children being born in Korea due to decreased fertility rates is resulting in a downward trend in the overall number of PED-ED patients (Fig. 1C and D).20 It is therefore possible that these findings are also applicable to other countries with low fertility rates.21 We performed a comparative analysis of N-PEDs to elucidate the characteristics of N-TAPs presenting to the PED-ED. N-TAPs have greater disease/symptom severity, higher hospitalization rates, longer hospital stays, and greater use of the Medical Aid insurance program compared to N-PEDs (Table 3, Fig. 2). The characteristics of N-TAPs found in this study are supported by several other studies. Camfield and Camfield.1 concluded that in cases of epilepsy, which accounts for many of the neurologic conditions observed in the PED-ED, if the disease is severe and persists beyond the age of 15–20 years, the risk of sudden unexpected death may increase. Similarly, Wakamoto et al.6 suggested that the mortality rate is higher for adult than pediatric patients with childhood-onset epilepsy. The finding of high severity levels of N-TAPs in these studies is consistent with the results of the present study, suggesting that caution is required when treating N-TAPs in the PED-ED. Moreover, N-TAPs tended to have a lower socioeconomic status in some cohort studies performed in Canada, Finland, Japan, and Germany.1619 Those findings and the results of the present study highlight the need for PED-ED practitioners to understand the different socioeconomic situations of their patients so that they can ensure that they have the social skills required to care for N-TAPs. The proportion of N-TAPs who presented to the PED-ED with an underlying primary neurologic disorder was higher than that of N-PEDs. Therefore, presenting to the PED-ED with underlying neurologic disorders was more likely among N-TAPs rather among N-PEDs. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.087), and hence further observations are needed to confirm the real situation. We suggest that support focusing on neurologic disease is necessary in the PED-ED due to the high hospitalization rates of N-TAPs who present for treatment. A recent study by Michihata et al.22 of the primary diagnoses of adult patients in a pediatric department may support the concept that clinicians should focus more on disease-oriented care—rather than age-oriented care—when treating N-TAPs. To gain a better understanding of N-TAPs, we performed a comparative analysis of N-TAPs and N-PEDs among the admitted and discharged patients (Table 4 and 5). It was hypothesized that N-TAPs tend to be homogeneous because no significant difference was found in the other variables; however, the severity level of admitted patients was higher than that of discharged patients. Furthermore, admitted N-PEDs accounted for a higher percentage of almost all of the aforementioned main symptoms. In addition, because the rate of a systemic diagnosis was significantly higher in the admitted patients than in the discharged patients, N-PEDs appeared to be heterogeneous regardless of whether they were admitted. Our comparison of the characteristics of admitted N-TAPs and N-PEDs revealed that N-TAPs might have disease-specific associations rather than main symptoms at the time of presentation to the PED-ED. Therefore, the underlying neurologic characteristics should be considered when N-TAPs present to the PED-ED. We investigated the underlying neurologic diseases of 55 N-TAPs (Table 6). Epilepsy and neurometabolic disease were the most-common diagnoses, which is probably due to recent medical advancements including new neurologic drugs significantly improving the survival rates of these patients; in other words, these patients are able to live past childhood and then present to the PED-ED during adulthood for treatment. In addition, the increased survival rates and the development of diagnostic technology—along with the increasing focus on treating pediatric neurologic and rare diseases—mean that these diseases can be diagnosed and have become treatable. Therefore, the increase in neurometabolic disease rates among N-TAPs is the result of precision medicine, and this trend for N-TAPs is expected to continue.17817 Epilepsy is characterized by a wide variety of clinical manifestations, and neurometabolic disease is accompanied by a wide range of neurologic symptoms that often result in new symptoms developing during adulthood. Some researchers have suggested that pediatric neurologists should focus on other chronic neurologic diseases that were not considered in this study, such as tuberous sclerosis complex, Rett syndrome, Dravet syndrome, and autism/autistic spectrum disorder.17 However, there has been a general lack of interest in transition patients such as N-TAPs, resulting in insufficient resources for transitional health care such as pathophysiology, appropriate drug dosage, and emotional care for N-TAPs. Neurologic diseases can have long-term effects on the physical health, mental health, and social activities of N-TAPs. Therefore, in addition to treating the disease itself, pediatric neurologists should develop long-term care plans for N-TAPs that include multidisciplinary care by pediatric psychiatrists and pediatric psychologists. Despite our research being limited by the small number of patients, we have been able to draw clear conclusions about the status of N-TAPs in the PED-ER and the role of pediatric neurologists in treating and managing this patient population. N-TAPs show a trend of rapidly increasing presentations to the PED-ED for treatment. Therefore, appropriate medical care is required for adult patients with pediatric-oriented diseases who not only present to the PED-ED but also present to medical departments and intensive-care units.2223 Improving the quality of life and long-term survival of TAPs requires an accurate understanding of the natural course of their underlying diseases and the ability to apply this knowledge systematically in PED-EDs, medical departments, intensive-care units, and outpatient departments. In addition, pediatric neurologists need to be familiar with medication dosages for adults and the pathophysiology of TAPs, which may differ from that of children, in order to be able to effectively treat N-TAPs.24 Pediatric neurologists should consider the emotional upset that can occur in situations when N-TAPs receive adult care, and be able to help with natural bridging to adult care. The mental development of TAPs must be considered by pediatric neurologists, which requires multidisciplinary care by pediatric psychiatrists and pediatric psychologists. A formal and gradual transition process from pediatric to adult health-care services should be established via long preparation periods, cooperation between health-care professionals, and education of patients regarding self-management and self-monitoring.2526 Because N-TAPs comprise a major proportion of TAPs, a plan of care needs to be established for them through further epidemiologic studies.
  24 in total

1.  Pediatric emergency department use by adults with chronic pediatric disorders.

Authors:  William M McDonnell; Irene Kocolas; Genie E Roosevelt; Angela T Yetman
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2010-06

2.  [A difficult transition from childhood to adult healthcare: the case of epilepsy].

Authors:  A-O Affdal; M-L Moutard; T Billette de Villemeur; N Duchange; C Hervé; G Moutel
Journal:  Arch Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.180

3.  Prevalence and trends of the adult patient population in a pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Tara Rhine; Mike Gittelman; Nathan Timm
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.454

4.  Adults with chronic health conditions originating in childhood: inpatient experience in children's hospitals.

Authors:  Denise M Goodman; Matthew Hall; Amanda Levin; R Scott Watson; Roberta G Williams; Samir S Shah; Anthony D Slonim
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Epilepsy transition: challenges of caring for adults with childhood-onset seizures.

Authors:  Felippe Borlot; Jose F Tellez-Zenteno; Anita Allen; Anfal Ali; O Carter Snead; Danielle M Andrade
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 6.  Pharmacology aspects during transition and at transfer in patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  Catherine Chiron; Isabelle An
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.864

7.  Preventable and unpreventable causes of childhood-onset epilepsy plus mental retardation.

Authors:  Carol Camfield; Peter Camfield
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Avoiding the 'twilight zone': recommendations for the transition of services from adolescence to adulthood for young people with ADHD.

Authors:  Susan Young; Clodagh M Murphy; David Coghill
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  The differences in health care utilization between Medical Aid and health insurance: a longitudinal study using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Kim; Kwang-Soo Lee; Ki-Bong Yoo; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical Considerations When Applying Vital Signs in Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale.

Authors:  Bongjin Lee; Do Kyun Kim; June Dong Park; Young Ho Kwak
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  1 in total

1.  Transition from pediatric to adult care among patients with epilepsy: Cross-sectional surveys of experts and patients in Korea.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Jung; Seung Woo Yu; Keon Su Lee; Yoon Young Yi; Joon Won Kang
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2022-07-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.