Literature DB >> 30877633

An Educational Intervention to Improve Provider Screening for Syphilis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Utilizing an Urban Urgent Care Center.

Dina Romo1,2, Gowri Nagendra3, Sarah Schechter4, April Pavlish3, Alwyn Cohall5, Natalie Neu6.   

Abstract

Rates of syphilis are increasing in the United States especially among men who have sex with men (MSM). The purpose of this project was to implement an educational intervention based on the 2015 CDC Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Treatment Guidelines for urgent care providers with an emphasis on identifying MSM sexual behavior and appropriate screening for syphilis. An urgent care center was identified as a location where men seek care and where STD testing was occurring. After a baseline provider focus group to identify barriers to STD testing, a patient survey was created and given to clients to increase identification of MSM behaviors and to prompt providers to order syphilis testing. In addition, an educational intervention was implemented to improve provider and staff screening for syphilis. The intervention occurred between September 2015-December 2015. A total of 1341 males were seen with 1067 surveys collected. The mean age was 35.6 and 57.4% were Hispanic. Overall, 72 (5.4%) males identified as MSM. Approximately 50% of all MSM identified had RPRs (n = 37) sent and of these 13.5% (n = 5) tested positive for syphilis. The focus group among urgent care providers and staff identified barriers to syphilis testing. Targeted screening of males using a self-administered questionnaire is acceptable to urgent care populations and may assist in identifying MSM which in turn may help to facilitate syphilis screening and other relevant STI testing pertinent to this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MSM (men-who-have-sex-with-men); Screening test; Syphilis; Urgent care setting

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30877633     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-019-00647-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  10 in total

Review 1.  Social determinants and sexually transmitted disease disparities.

Authors:  Matthew Hogben; Jami S Leichliter
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Gail A Bolan
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2015-06-05

3.  Provider barriers prevent recommended sexually transmitted disease screening of HIV-infected men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Jarvis W Carter; Geoffrey D Hart-Cooper; Mary O Butler; Kimberly A Workowski; Karen W Hoover
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Computerized self-interviews improve Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among youth in the emergency department.

Authors:  Fahd A Ahmad; Donna B Jeffe; Katie Plax; Karen K Collins; Kenneth B Schechtman; Dwight E Doerhoff; Jane Garbutt; David M Jaffe
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Approach to Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing for Men at an Urban Urgent Care Center.

Authors:  Sarah B Schechter; Dina L Romo; Alwyn T Cohall; Natalie M Neu
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  The Epidemiology of Syphilis in New York City: Historic Trends and the Current Outbreak Among Men Who Have Sex With Men, 2016.

Authors:  Julia Ann Schillinger; Jennifer Sanderson Slutsker; Preeti Pathela; Ellen J Klingler; Robin R Hennessy; Brian Toro; Susan Blank
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Clinical features and incidence rates of ocular complications in patients with ocular syphilis.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Moradi; Sherveen Salek; Ebenezer Daniel; Sapna Gangaputra; Trucian A Ostheimer; Bryn M Burkholder; Theresa G Leung; Nicholas J Butler; James P Dunn; Jennifer E Thorne
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients.

Authors:  K G Ghanem; H E Hutton; J M Zenilman; R Zimba; E J Erbelding
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Predictors of unfavorable outcome in neurosyphilis: Multicenter ID-IRI Study.

Authors:  Derya Ozturk-Engin; Hakan Erdem; Rodrigo Hasbun; Shu-Hua Wang; Hulya Tireli; Pierre Tattevin; Xavier Argemi; Enora Ouamara-Digue; Andrea Gombos; Botond Lakatos; Fatma Sırmatel; Yasemin Cag; Abdullah Umut Pekok; Seniha Senbayrak; Ilker Inanç Balkan; Marie Gheno; Nuray Uzun; Selçuk Kaya; Gönül Cicek-Senturk; Gönül Şengöz; Recep Tekin; Mustafa Kemal Çelen; Saygın Nayman-Alpat; Pınar Ergen; Alper Şener; Canan Agalar; Sükran Köse; Ahmet Çagkan Inkaya; Figen Kaptan; Fahad Al-Majid; Umit Savasci; Haluk Vahaboglu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Access and care issues in urban urgent care clinic patients.

Authors:  David R Scott; Holly A Batal; Sharon Majeres; Jill C Adams; Rita Dale; Philip S Mehler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.