Literature DB >> 30877301

A Bayesian Analysis of Evidence in Support of the Null Hypothesis in Gerontological Psychology (or Lack Thereof).

Christopher R Brydges1, Allison A M Bielak1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Nonsignificant p values derived from null hypothesis significance testing do not distinguish between true null effects or cases where the data are insensitive in distinguishing the hypotheses. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Bayesian analyses in gerontological psychology, a statistical technique that can distinguish between conclusive and inconclusive nonsignificant results, by using Bayes factors (BFs) to reanalyze nonsignificant results from published gerontological research.
METHODS: Nonsignificant results mentioned in abstracts of articles published in 2017 volumes of 10 top gerontological psychology journals were extracted (N = 409) and categorized based on whether Bayesian analyses were conducted. BFs were calculated from nonsignificant t-tests within this sample to determine how frequently the null hypothesis was strongly supported.
RESULTS: Nonsignificant results were directly tested with BFs in 1.22% of studies. Bayesian reanalyses of 195 nonsignificant t-tests found that only 7.69% of the findings provided strong evidence in support of the null hypothesis.
CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian analyses are rarely used in gerontological research, and a large proportion of null findings were deemed inconclusive when reanalyzed with BFs. Researchers are encouraged to use BFs to test the validity of nonsignificant results and ensure that sufficient sample sizes are used so that the meaningfulness of null findings can be evaluated.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes factor; Meta-research; Null hypothesis significance testing; Statistical power

Year:  2020        PMID: 30877301     DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbz033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  6 in total

1.  The Impact of a Sustained Cognitive Engagement Intervention on Cognitive Variability: The Synapse Project.

Authors:  Christopher R Brydges; Allison A M Bielak
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2019-06-05

2.  Predicting Audiovisual Word Recognition in Noisy Situations: Toward Precision Audiology.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Sandra Hale; Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Guilty, Innocent, or Just Not Proven? Bayesian Verdicts in the Case of Inhibitory Deficits.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Kyle G Featherston; Cynthia Flores; Lindsey Lilienthal; Young Bui; Sandra Hale
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Is Absolute Pitch Associated With Musical Tension Processing?

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Tang Hai; Dongrui Man; Linshu Zhou
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-11-18

5.  Are age differences in recognition-based retrieval monitoring an epiphenomenon of age differences in memory?

Authors:  Christopher Hertzog; Taylor Curley; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2021-04-01

6.  Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology.

Authors:  Christopher R Brydges
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2019-09-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.