Literature DB >> 30877129

Circulating Inflammation Markers and Risk of Gastric and Esophageal Cancers: A Case-Cohort Study Within the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study.

M Constanza Camargo1, Minkyo Song2, Taichi Shimazu3, Hadrien Charvat3, Taiki Yamaji3, Norie Sawada3, Troy J Kemp4, Ruth M Pfeiffer2, Allan Hildesheim2, Ligia A Pinto4, Shoichiro Tsugane3, Charles S Rabkin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Circulating inflammation proteins may be important mediators or markers of carcinogenic mechanisms. There have been few studies with limited numbers of analytes in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract tumors. We therefore evaluated risk associations of gastric and esophageal cancers with prediagnostic levels of a wide range of these molecules.
METHODS: We performed a case-cohort analysis within the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study Cohort II, including incident cases of gastric (n = 446) and esophageal (n = 68) cancers and a random subcohort (n = 774). A total of 64 biomarkers were measured in baseline plasma using Luminex bead-based assays. The median time between blood collection and diagnosis was 8.1 years for gastric cancer and 9.4 years for esophageal cancer. HRs for association with each marker were adjusted for potential confounders using Cox regression.
RESULTS: In separate models, sEGFR and TSLP were nominally associated with gastric cancer risk, and CRP, CXCL11/ITAC, and CCL15/MIP1D were associated with esophageal cancer. However, no association satisfied statistical significance after FDR correction. Associations did not differ by time from blood collection to cancer (<5 vs. ≥5 years).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study failed to identify associations of circulating inflammation markers with risk of upper GI tract tumors. IMPACT: To date, this is the largest assessment of inflammation-related proteins with gastric and esophageal cancer risks. However, the evaluated molecules may not fully represent the complex inflammation processes preceding malignant transformation. Further investigation of other markers in prospective studies is warranted, as demonstration of associations may have important implications for prevention and treatment of these cancers. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30877129     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  4 in total

1.  Metabolic Syndrome, Physical Activity, and Inflammation: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 110 Circulating Biomarkers in Japanese Adults.

Authors:  Sarah C Van Alsten; Charles S Rabkin; Norie Sawada; Taichi Shimazu; Hadrien Charvat; Taiki Yamaji; Manami Inoue; Troy J Kemp; Ligia A Pinto; M Constanza Camargo; Shoichiro Tsugane; Minkyo Song
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  miR-1298-5p Influences the Malignancy Phenotypes of Breast Cancer Cells by Inhibiting CXCL11.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Dawei Hu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Analysis of the HNF4A isoform-regulated transcriptome identifies CCL15 as a downstream target in gastric carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Zhen Ni; Wenquan Lu; Qi Li; Chuan Han; Ting Yuan; Nina Sun; Yongquan Shi
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.248

4.  Circulating immune- and inflammation-related biomarkers and early-stage noncardia gastric cancer risk.

Authors:  Minkyo Song; Charles S Rabkin; Hidemi Ito; Isao Oze; Yuriko N Koyanagi; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Yumiko Kasugai; Keitaro Matsuo; M Constanza Camargo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.164

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.