| Literature DB >> 30875747 |
Yongchun Cheng1, Chao Chai2, Chunyu Liang3, Yu Chen4.
Abstract
In this paper, the performance of a warm-mixed porous asphalt mixture (PAM) with steel slag as aggregate and crumb-rubber⁻SBS (styrene-butadiene-styrene) modified bitumen as a binder was studied. Two kinds of warming additives were used, namely ethylene bis stearic acid amide (EBS) and stearic acid amide (SA). The mixtures were investigated for their permeability, Marshall stability, low-temperature crack resistance, and underwent a rutting test, water sensitivity evaluation and Cantabro particle loss test. Then, the viscoelastic and dynamic characteristics of the mixtures were also analyzed. The results showed that the addition of the warming additives allowed the decrease of the manufacturing temperature by 10 °C. Thus, the addition of warming additives significantly improves the low-temperature crack resistance and slightly reduces the water sensitivity, weakly increases the permeability, and has little effect on the resilient modulus. Since the addition of SA significantly improves the low-temperature crack resistance and rutting resistance of the PAM, SA is therefore recommended for pavement engineering in seasonal frozen regions.Entities:
Keywords: crumb-rubber–SBS modified bitumen; mechanical performance; porous asphalt mixture; steel slag; warm mix asphalt
Year: 2019 PMID: 30875747 PMCID: PMC6470688 DOI: 10.3390/ma12060857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Properties of SBS-modified bitumen.
| Properties | Results | Chinese Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Penetration (25 °C, 0.1 mm) | 65.2 | 60–80 |
| Softening point (°C) | 64.2 | ≥55 |
| Ductility (5 °C, cm) | 34.5 | ≥30 |
| Flash point (°C) | 264 | ≥230 |
| Elastic recovery (25 °C, %) | 91.7 | ≥65 |
| After TFOT | ||
| Mass loss (%) | 0.34 | ≤±1.0 |
| Penetration ratio (25 °C, %) | 62 | ≥60 |
| Ductility (5 °C, cm) | 27 | ≥20 |
Properties of crumb-rubber.
| Properties | Results | Technical Criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Apparent density (g/cm3) | 1.18 | 1.1–1.3 |
| Metal content (%) | 0.038 | <0.05 |
| Moisture content (%) | 0.32 | <1 |
| Fiber content (%) | 0.43 | <1 |
| Ash content (%) | 4.5 | ≤8 |
Figure 1(a) Ethylene bis stearic acid amide (EBS); (b) stearic acid amide (SA); (c) crumb-rubber.
Properties of steel slag.
| Properties | Results | Chinese Standard | Specification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apparent specific density (g/cm3) | 3.527 | ≥2.6 | T 0304 |
| Los Angeles abrasion (%) | 12.9 | ≤28 | T 0317 |
| Flakiness content (%) | 4.56 | ≤10 | T 0312 |
| Crushed stone value (%) | 13.9 | ≤26 | T 0316 |
Figure 2Curves of PAC mixture.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of apparatus.
Figure 4The low-temperature splitting test.
Figure 5The creep test.
Figure 6Indirect tensile test.
Figure 7Result of the viscosity test.
Void characteristics and permeability coefficient. PAM: porous asphalt mixture.
| Types of Mixture | Voids in PAMs (%) | Permeability Coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Sd | Mean | Sd | |
| Control group | 21.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.012 |
| EBS-PAM | 23.2 | 1.4 | 0.33 | 0.014 |
| SA-PAM | 23.8 | 1.3 | 0.34 | 0.012 |
| Chinese standard | ≥18 | ≥0.28 |
Marshall stability and flow value.
| Types of Mixture | Stability (KN) | Flow Value (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Sd | Mean | Sd | |
| Control group | 8.20 | 0.8 | 2.25 | 0.03 |
| EBS-PAM | 8.29 | 0.6 | 2.76 | 0.02 |
| SA-PAM | 9.71 | 0.4 | 2.37 | 0.04 |
| Chinese standard | ≥5.0 | 2–4 |
Marshall stability comparison.
| Types of Mixture | Aggregate | Voids in Mixture (%) | Stability (KN) | Flow Value (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAM | Steel Slag | 21.5 | 8.20 | 2.25 |
| PAM | Basalt | 20.3 | 6.21 | 2.9 |
The results of the freeze–thaw splitting test.
| Types of Mixture | Splitting Strength (MPa) | Freeze–Thaw Splitting Strength (MPa) | Freeze–Thaw Splitting Strength Ratio (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Sd | Mean | Sd | ||
| Control group | 0.628 | 0.026 | 0.588 | 0.012 | 93 |
| EBS-PAM | 0.628 | 0.030 | 0.543 | 0.020 | 86 |
| SA-PAM | 0.629 | 0.012 | 0.552 | 0.016 | 87 |
| Chinese standard | - | - | ≥85 |
Figure 8(a) The splitting strength; (b) the failure strain; (c) the failure stiffness modulus.
Dynamic stability.
| Types of Mixture | Dynamic Stability | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 2.14 | 2.29 | 4200 |
| EBS-PAM | 2.81 | 3.18 | 1703 |
| SA-PAM | 1.98 | 2.10 | 5250 |
Cantabro particle loss.
| Types of Mixture | Cantabro Particle Loss (%) | Chinese Standard | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Sd | ||
| Control group | 9.5 | 0.21 | ≤15 |
| EBS-PAM | 13.8 | 0.40 | ≤15 |
| SA-PAM | 12.3 | 0.32 | ≤15 |
Figure 9The creep curves of the three mixtures.
The fitting results.
| Types of Mixture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 58.3 | 1.37 × 106 | 185.5 | 3064 | 16.5 | 0.94 |
| EBS-PAM | 46.2 | 1.18 × 106 | 142 | 2488 | 17.5 | 0.94 |
| SA-PAM | 54.6 | 2.30 × 106 | 358.5 | 7193.4 | 20.0 | 0.94 |
Results of resilient modulus.
| Types of Mixture | Pressure/KN | Horizontal Stress /KPa | Horizontal Deformation | Resilient Modulus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 1.6 | 169.6 | 5.0 | 3396 |
| EBS-PAM | 1.7 | 180.6 | 5.1 | 3527 |
| SA-PAM | 1.7 | 162.7 | 5.0 | 3347 |