Mehret Birru Talabi1, Megan E B Clowse2, Susan J Blalock3, Megan Hamm1, Sonya Borrero4. 1. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 3. University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill. 4. University of Pittsburgh and Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veteran's Administration Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about whether and how rheumatologists provide family planning counseling and reproductive health care (FPCC) to reproductive-age women with rheumatic diseases. This qualitative study sought to assess rheumatologists' perspectives, attitudes, and practices regarding FPCC. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a geographically diverse US sample of rheumatologists (n = 12). Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and a code book was inductively developed based on transcript content. Two coders applied the code book to all transcripts, and coding differences were adjudicated to full agreement. The finalized coding was used to conduct a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Six themes were identified across interviews. Rheumatologists said that they 1) feel responsible for providing some FPCC to patients, 2) experience tension between respecting patients' autonomy and their own anxieties about managing high-risk pregnancies, 3) view patient-initiated conversations as FPCC facilitators, and they regard lack of guidelines and the presence of competing clinical priorities as barriers to FPCC, 4) are reluctant to prescribe contraception, 5) desire greater access to resources to help guide FPCC, and 6) recognize the benefits of multidisciplinary collaboration with gynecologists. CONCLUSION: Rheumatologists feel a sense of responsibility to provide some aspects of FPCC to reproductive-age female patients. However, their own apprehensions about managing complicated pregnancies may negatively influence how they advise patients about pregnancy planning or avoidance. Rheumatologists do not prescribe contraception but rarely refer patients to gynecologists for contraceptive care. Future work should focus on eliminating barriers and identifying solutions that support rheumatologists' efforts to provide high-quality FPCC to patients.
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about whether and how rheumatologists provide family planning counseling and reproductive health care (FPCC) to reproductive-age women with rheumatic diseases. This qualitative study sought to assess rheumatologists' perspectives, attitudes, and practices regarding FPCC. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a geographically diverse US sample of rheumatologists (n = 12). Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and a code book was inductively developed based on transcript content. Two coders applied the code book to all transcripts, and coding differences were adjudicated to full agreement. The finalized coding was used to conduct a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Six themes were identified across interviews. Rheumatologists said that they 1) feel responsible for providing some FPCC to patients, 2) experience tension between respecting patients' autonomy and their own anxieties about managing high-risk pregnancies, 3) view patient-initiated conversations as FPCC facilitators, and they regard lack of guidelines and the presence of competing clinical priorities as barriers to FPCC, 4) are reluctant to prescribe contraception, 5) desire greater access to resources to help guide FPCC, and 6) recognize the benefits of multidisciplinary collaboration with gynecologists. CONCLUSION: Rheumatologists feel a sense of responsibility to provide some aspects of FPCC to reproductive-age female patients. However, their own apprehensions about managing complicated pregnancies may negatively influence how they advise patients about pregnancy planning or avoidance. Rheumatologists do not prescribe contraception but rarely refer patients to gynecologists for contraceptive care. Future work should focus on eliminating barriers and identifying solutions that support rheumatologists' efforts to provide high-quality FPCC to patients.
Authors: Yvonne van Eijk-Hustings; Astrid van Tubergen; Carina Boström; Elena Braychenko; Beate Buss; José Felix; Jill Firth; Alison Hammond; Benny Harston; Cristina Hernandez; Masa Huzjak; Jana Korandová; Marja Leena Kukkurainen; Robert Landewé; Maryse Mezieres; Marijana Milincovic; Antonella Moretti; Susan Oliver; Jette Primdahl; Marieke Scholte-Voshaar; Jenny de la Torre-Aboki; Jennifer Waite-Jones; Rene Westhovens; Heidi Andersen Zangi; Turid Heiberg; Jackie Hill Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Nevena Rebić; Ria Garg; Ursula Ellis; Vanessa Kitchin; Sarah Munro; Glen Hazlewood; Neda Amiri; Nick Bansback; Mary A De Vera Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Tamar Krishnamurti; Mehret Birru Talabi; Lisa S Callegari; Traci M Kazmerski; Sonya Borrero Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Katherine P Pryor; Bill Albert; Sonali Desai; Susan Y Ritter; Laura Tarter; Jonathan Coblyn; Bonnie L Bermas; Leah M Santacroce; Caryn Dutton; Kari P Braaten; Lydia E Pace; Kathryn Rexrode; Elizabeth Janiak; Candace H Feldman Journal: ACR Open Rheumatol Date: 2022-05-31