Literature DB >> 30873559

How many pigs within a group need to be sick to lead to a diagnostic change in the group's behavior?1.

Amy L Miller1, Hillary A Dalton1, Theo Kanellos2, Ilias Kyriazakis1.   

Abstract

Disease is a leading cause of diminished welfare and productivity in pig systems, but its spread among pigs within commercial herds can be limited through early detection. Identifying specific behavioral changes at the onset of disease can have a substantial diagnostic value by improving treatment success through timely intervention. Our study aimed to identify key behaviors that visibly change at the group level when only a few individuals are acutely sick. First, we quantified the behavioral changes seen during an acute health challenge in groups of pigs, using total pen vaccination as an artificial sickness model. Then we investigated the minimum proportion of sick pigs needed to detect group level behavioral changes using three treatments: a control (Con; 0% pigs), low (±20% pigs), or a high (±50% pigs) number of pigs vaccinated in the pens. Total pen vaccination in Trial 1 produced group level behavioral changes, including reduced feeding (P < 0.001), non-nutritive visits to the feeder (P < 0.01), drinking (P < 0.001), standing (P < 0.001), and interaction with pen enrichment (P < 0.001), accompanied by increased lying rates (P < 0.01) and elevated body temperatures (P < 0.001), confirming that vaccination is an appropriate model to study effects of acute sickness. In Trial 2, group level declines in interaction with the enrichment device (P < 0.001) and standing rates (P = 0.064), along with an increase in pen lying rates (P < 0.001), were apparent in the Low treatment when compared to the Con rates, which suggests these key behaviors could serve an important diagnostic value for early disease detection in groups. These changes lasted for up to 3 h post vaccination. In contrast, feeding rates (treatment × time of day: P < 0.01) only showed a decrease from the Con in the High treatment after vaccination, with pen drinking showing a similar trend (treatment: P = 0.07), suggesting that these behaviors would be more appropriate for confirming the spread of disease within a herd. Identifying key behaviors that alert to the presence of disease is critical to further refine automated early warning systems using pen level sensors for commercial pig operations.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disease detection; early warning system; pig health; sickness behavior; subclinical disease; swine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30873559      PMCID: PMC6488319          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  19 in total

1.  The automated analysis of clustering behaviour of piglets from thermal images in response to immune challenge by vaccination.

Authors:  N J Cook; C J Bench; T Liu; B Chabot; A L Schaefer
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Experimental model of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in pigs: potential for an early recognition of colibacillosis by monitoring of behavior.

Authors:  B Krsnik; R Yammine; Z Pavicić; T Balenović; B Njari; I Vrbanac; I Valpotić
Journal:  Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.268

3.  Board-invited review: Using behavior to predict and identify ill health in animals.

Authors:  D M Weary; J M Huzzey; M A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Towards a functional explanation for the occurrence of anorexia during parasitic infections.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Towards humane end points: behavioural changes precede clinical signs of disease in a Huntington's disease model.

Authors:  Kate Littin; Abraham Acevedo; William Browne; Joanne Edgar; Mike Mendl; Diane Owen; Chris Sherwin; Hanno Würbel; Christine Nicol
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Body temperature and motion: Evaluation of an online monitoring system in pigs challenged with Porcine Reproductive & Respiratory Syndrome Virus.

Authors:  Tamás Süli; Máté Halas; Zsófia Benyeda; Réka Boda; Sándor Belák; Marta Martínez-Avilés; Eduardo Fernández-Carrión; José Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.534

7.  Infrared thermography detects febrile and behavioural responses to vaccination of weaned piglets.

Authors:  N J Cook; B Chabot; T Lui; C J Bench; A L Schaefer
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Early detection of health and welfare compromises through automated detection of behavioural changes in pigs.

Authors:  Stephen G Matthews; Amy L Miller; James Clapp; Thomas Plötz; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.688

9.  Motion-based video monitoring for early detection of livestock diseases: The case of African swine fever.

Authors:  Eduardo Fernández-Carrión; Marta Martínez-Avilés; Benjamin Ivorra; Beatriz Martínez-López; Ángel Manuel Ramos; José Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Automated tracking to measure behavioural changes in pigs for health and welfare monitoring.

Authors:  Stephen G Matthews; Amy L Miller; Thomas PlÖtz; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

2.  Feeding behavior in pigs.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Automated recognition of postures and drinking behaviour for the detection of compromised health in pigs.

Authors:  Ali Alameer; Ilias Kyriazakis; Jaume Bacardit
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A deep learning-based approach for feeding behavior recognition of weanling pigs.

Authors:  MinJu Kim; YoHan Choi; Jeong-Nam Lee; SooJin Sa; Hyun-Chong Cho
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.