| Literature DB >> 30873462 |
Ricardo Yukio Asano1,2, Marcelo Magalhães Sales3, Rodrigo Alberto Vieira Browne4, José Fernando Vila Nova de Moraes5, Rafael da Costa Sotero6, Gisela Arsa7, Jonato Prestes8, Johanna Lopez9, John Eugene Lewis10, Herbert Gustavo Simões8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aerobic exercise is recommended for glycemic and weight control in type 2 diabetes (T2D), but exercise intensity that increase post-exercise fat oxidation has not been established yet. It is expected that high-intensity exercise induce higher absolute oxidations and rates of oxidation of CHO (during) and fat (after) in normoglycemic, but in hyperglycemic it is unclear. AIM: To compare the effects of exercise intensity on CHO and fat oxidation during and after exercise in individuals with T2D.Entities:
Keywords: adipose tissue; blood glucose; diabetes; metabolic disease; oxidation; physical exercise
Year: 2016 PMID: 30873462 PMCID: PMC6410654
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Transl Res ISSN: 2382-6533
Figure 1.Summary of experimental design.
Mean values for VO2, blood lactate, % maximal HR, rate-pressure product (SBP × HR), and RPE during the exercise and control conditions (CON, 80%LT, and 120%LT).
| CON | 80%LT | 120%LT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| VO2 (mL∙kg−1∙min−1) | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 12.9 ± 2.6 | 17.6 ± 3.0 |
| Blood Lactate (μM) | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.9 | 5.2 ± 1.5a |
| HRmax (%) | 46.5 ± 6.9 | 77.5 ± 7.1 | 92.6 ± 11.1 |
| Rate-pressure product | 7632.1 ± 1184.3 | 15803.3 ± 1989.7 | 17898.0 ± 2723.1 |
| RPE (score) | 11.0 ± 1.3 | 13.0 ± 0.6 |
Values are mean ± SD. CON, control session; HRmax, maximal heart rate; RPE, rating of perceived exertion; SBP, systolic blood pressure; VO2, oxygen consumption; 120%LT, exercise condition at 120% of lactate threshold; 80%LT, exercise condition at 80% of lactate threshold.
p ≤ 0.05 to CON;
p ≤ 0.05 to 80%LT.
Figure 2.Respiratory-exchange ratio (VCO2 / VO2) (A) and blood lactate (B) at each 5 min during intervention (5’ – 20’) for the exercise and control conditions. Values are mean (± SD). CON, control session; 120%LT, exercise at 120% of lactate threshold; 80%LT, exercise at 80% of lactate threshold. a p < 0.05 at the same time to CON; b p < 0.05 at the same time to 80%LT; c p < 0.05 to rest at the same session.
Figure 3.Oxygen consumption (VO2) at each 5 min of intervention (5’ – 20’) and during the recovery period (rec15’ – rec45’) for the exercise and control conditions. Values are mean (± SD). CON, control session; 120%LT, exercise at 120% of lactate threshold; 80%LT, exercise at 80% of lactate threshold. a p < 0.05 at the same time to CON; b p < 0.05 at the same time to 80%LT; c p < 0.05 to rest at the same session.
Figure 4.Mean percentage of carbohydrate (CHO) and fat oxidation during exercise and control conditions (A), and at the recovery period (B). CON – control session. 80%LT – exercise condition at 80% of lactate threshold. 120%LT – exercise condition at 120% of lactate threshold. a p ≤ 0.05 vs. CON.
Figure 5.Rate of carbohydrate (A) and fat (B) oxidation during conditions. Values are mean (± SD). CHO, carbohydrate; CON, control session; 120%LT, exercise at 120% of lactate threshold; 80%LT, exercise at 80% of lactate threshold. a p ≤ 0.05 vs. CON; b p ≤0.05 vs. 80%LT.