| Literature DB >> 30873190 |
Lingyu Li1,2, Haomeng Yang1, Lianwei Peng3, Weibo Ren4, Jirui Gong5, Peng Liu1,2, Xinhong Wu4, Fang Huang1.
Abstract
Sheepgrass [Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel] is a valuable forage plant highly significant to the grassland productivity of Euro-Asia steppes. Growth of above-ground tissues of L. chinensis is the major component contributing to the grass yield. Although it is generally known that this species is sensitive to ecosystem disturbance and adverse environments, detailed information of how L. chinensis coping with various nutrient deficiency especially phosphate deprivation (-Pi) is still limited. Here, we investigated impact of Pi-deprivation on shoot growth and biomass accumulation as well as photosynthetic properties of L. chinensis. Growth inhibition of Pi-deprived seedlings was most obvious and reduction of biomass accumulation and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) was 55.3 and 63.3%, respectively, compared to the control plants grown under Pi-repleted condition. Also, we compared these characters with seedlings subjected to low-Pi stress condition. Pi-deprivation caused 18.5 and 12.3% more reduction of biomass and Pn relative to low-Pi-stressed seedlings, respectively. Further analysis of in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence and thylakoid membrane protein complexes using 2D-BN/SDS-PAGE combined with immunoblot detection demonstrated that among the measured photosynthetic parameters, decrease of ATP synthase activity was most pronounced in Pi-deprived plants. Together with less extent of lipid peroxidation of the thylakoid membranes and increased ROS scavenger enzyme activities in the leaves of Pi-deprived seedlings, we suggest that the decreased activity of ATP synthase in their thylakoids is the major cause of the greater reduction of photosynthetic efficiency than that of low-Pi stressed plants, leading to the least shoot growth and biomass production in L. chinensis.Entities:
Keywords: ATP synthase; L. chinensis; Pi-deprivation; low-Pi stress; photosynthesis
Year: 2019 PMID: 30873190 PMCID: PMC6401631 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Growth and biomass accumulation in above-ground tissues of L. chinensis grown under different Pi concentrations. (A) A representative photograph of seedlings grown under Pi-repleted (250 μM, control), Pi-deprived (0 μM) and low-Pi (2.5 μM) conditions for 4 weeks. Scale bar represents 5 cm. (B) Biomass accumulation in the above-ground tissues of the seedlings grown at the indicated Pi concentrations. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results. The data shown are from one of the experiments with three replicates. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 15). ∗∗Refers to p-values <0.01 in Student’s t-test.
FIGURE 2Anthocyanin and Pi contents in seedlings grown under different Pi concentrations. (A) Anthocyanin contents of the third leaves from control and Pi-deficient seedlings. (B) Pi content in leaf and root tissues of seedlings grown under different Pi concentrations. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results. The data shown are from one of the experiments with three replicates. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 15). ∗∗Refers to p-values <0.01 in Student’s t-test.
Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of leaves from control and Pi-deficient seedlings.
| Treatment | Chl content (mg g Fw-1) | Fv/Fm | Φ(II) | NPQ | P700 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 3.30 ± 0.20 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.58 ± 0.06 | 0.35 ± 0.11 | 1.10 ± 0.00 |
| 2.5 μM | 3.08 ± 0.08 | 0.62 ± 0.02∗∗ | 0.40 ± 0.05∗∗ | 0.99 ± 0.17∗∗ | 1.08 ± 0.00 |
| 0 μM | 3.06 ± 0.27 | 0.62 ± 0.02∗∗ | 0.41 ± 0.06∗∗ | 0.93 ± 0.19∗∗ | 1.09 ± 0.00 |
FIGURE 32-D BN/SDS-PAGE analysis of thylakoid membrane complexes from the leaves of control and Pi-stress-treated seedlings. Membranes (equivalent to 5 μg chlorophyll) solubilized with 1% n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside were separated by BN-PAGE in the first dimension (upper panel) followed by separation of the proteins in the second dimension using 15% SDS/PAGE (middle panel) and subsequent immunoblot detection with antibodies specific to subunits of PSII (α-D1, α-CP43) and PSI (α-PsaA, α-PsaB), respectively. Photosynthetic membrane complexes were designated according to (Peng et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2013). Similar results were obtained in two additional independent experiments.
FIGURE 4Comparison of MDA content and activity of ROS-scavenging enzymes in the third leaves of control and Pi-stress-treated seedlings. (A) MDA content determined via the thiobarbituric acid reactive substance assay. (B) Peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results. The data shown are from one of the experiments with three replicates. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 9). ∗, ∗∗Refer to p-values <0.05 and <0.01 in Student’s t-test, respectively.
FIGURE 5Measurements of ATP synthase activity and net photosynthesis rate (Pn) of the third leaves from control and Pi-stress-treated seedlings. (A) ATP synthase activity was estimated by thylakoid membrane H+ conductivity (gH+) calculated as gH+ = 1/τ, where τ is the time constant for decay determined by fitting a single exponential decay function to the electrochromic shift (ECS) decay signal obtained after the actinic light (754 μmol m-2 s-1) was switched off. Standard deviations were estimated from three biological replicates. Experiments were repeated twice and similar results were obtained. (B,C) Net photosynthesis rate (Pn) and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of the leaves from control and Pi-stress-treated seedlings, respectively. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results. The data shown are from one of the experiments with three replicates. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 15). ∗∗Refers to p-values <0.01 in Student’s t-test.