| Literature DB >> 30873123 |
Julie Calonne1, Laurie Isacco1,2,3, Jennifer Miles-Chan1, Denis Arsenijevic1, Jean-Pierre Montani1, Christelle Guillet2, Yves Boirie2, Abdul G Dulloo1.
Abstract
Objective: The recovery of body composition after weight loss is characterized by an accelerated rate of fat recovery (preferential catch-up fat) resulting partly from an adaptive suppression of thermogenesis. Although the skeletal muscle has been implicated as an effector site for such thrifty (energy conservation) metabolism driving catch-up fat, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. We test here the hypothesis that this thrifty metabolism driving catch-up fat could reside in a reduced rate of protein turnover (an energetically costly "futile" cycle) and in altered local thyroid hormone metabolism in skeletal muscle.Entities:
Keywords: caloric restriction; catch-up growth; deiodinase; obesity; thermogenesis; thrifty metabolism
Year: 2019 PMID: 30873123 PMCID: PMC6403129 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Primary antibodies and specific conditions used for analysis of DIO protein levels.
| Supplier | Proteintech Europe | Santa-Cruz biotechnology | Novus biological |
| Catalog number | 11790-1-AP | sc-98716 | NBP1-05767 |
| Dilution used | 1/1,000 | 1/200 | 1/1,000 |
| Blocking buffer | BSA | Milk | Milk |
| Gel | 0.8 mm | 0.8 mm | 0.8 mm |
| Stacking | 4% | 4% | 4 % |
| Resolving | 12% | 12% | 12 % |
| Running | 50 V for 30 min | 50 V for 30 min | 50 V for 30 min |
| conditions | 150 V for 2h | 150 V for 2h | 150 V for 2h |
| Transfer conditions | 400 mA for 1 h 30 | 400 mA for 1 h 30 | 400 mA for 1 h 30 |
Figure 1Body weight (A), body water (B), body fat (C), and body protein (D) at the end of semistarvation (day 0 of refeeding) and at week 1 and week 2 of refeeding; the refed are shown in black lines and the control animals in gray (broken) lines. The bar charts (E) show the data on energy balance (energy intake, energy gain and energy expenditure) over the entire 2-week refeeding period for the refed and control groups. The values are mean ± SE (n = 6). Statistical significance of differences are indicated as follows: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2Fractional rates of (A) protein synthesis (Ksyn), (B) protein growth (Kgrowth), and (C) protein degradation (Kdeg) in the Gastrocnemius, Soleus and Tibialis anterior muscles of rats after 7 days of refeeding in refed and control groups. The values are mean ± SE (n = 6–7). Statistical significance of differences are indicated as follows: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Net T3 formation from its T4 precursor in Gastrocnemius, Soleus and Tibialis anterior muscles from (i) rats semistarved (SS) for 14 days and their controls (CSS), and (ii) rats refed for 7 days (RF7) and their controls (CRF7). The values are mean ±SE (n = 6). Statistical significance of differences are indicated as follows: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4Protein expression of the deiodinases: (A) DIO1, (B) DIO2, and (C) DIO3 in Gastrocnemius (GA), Soleus and Tibialis anterior (TA) muscles from (i) rats semistarved (SS) for 14 days and their controls (CSS), and (ii) rats refed for 7 days (RF7) and their controls (CRF7). The values are mean ±SE (n = 4). Statistical significance of differences are indicated as follows: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.