Literature DB >> 30872866

Structured sparsity regularized multiple kernel learning for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.

Jialin Peng1,2,3, Xiaofeng Zhu3, Ye Wang1, Le An3, Dinggang Shen3,4.   

Abstract

Multimodal data fusion has shown great advantages in uncovering information that could be overlooked by using single modality. In this paper, we consider the integration of high-dimensional multi-modality imaging and genetic data for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. With a focus on taking advantage of both phenotype and genotype information, a novel structured sparsity, defined by ℓ 1, p-norm (p > 1), regularized multiple kernel learning method is designed. Specifically, to facilitate structured feature selection and fusion from heterogeneous modalities and also capture feature-wise importance, we represent each feature with a distinct kernel as a basis, followed by grouping the kernels according to modalities. Then, an optimally combined kernel presentation of multimodal features is learned in a data-driven approach. Contrary to the Group Lasso (i.e., ℓ 2, 1-norm penalty) which performs sparse group selection, the proposed regularizer enforced on kernel weights is to sparsely select concise feature set within each homogenous group and fuse the heterogeneous feature groups by taking advantage of dense norms. We have evaluated our method using data of subjects from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated by the clearly improved prediction diagnosis and also the discovered brain regions and SNPs relevant to AD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis; Feature selection; Multimodal features; Multiple kernel learning; Structured sparsity

Year:  2018        PMID: 30872866      PMCID: PMC6410562          DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pattern Recognit        ISSN: 0031-3203            Impact factor:   7.740


  8 in total

1.  Multi-modal neuroimaging feature selection with consistent metric constraint for diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Xiaoke Hao; Yongjin Bao; Yingchun Guo; Ming Yu; Daoqiang Zhang; Shannon L Risacher; Andrew J Saykin; Xiaohui Yao; Li Shen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Weighted Graph Regularized Sparse Brain Network Construction for MCI Identification.

Authors:  Renping Yu; Lishan Qiao; Mingming Chen; Seong-Whan Lee; Xuan Fei; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 7.740

3.  Effective Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease via Multimodal Fusion Analysis Framework.

Authors:  Xia-An Bi; Ruipeng Cai; Yang Wang; Yingchao Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Group-based local adaptive deep multiple kernel learning with lp norm.

Authors:  Shengbing Ren; Fa Liu; Weijia Zhou; Xian Feng; Chaudry Naeem Siddique
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Estimating Brain Functional Networks Based on Adaptively-Weighted fMRI Signals for MCI Identification.

Authors:  Huihui Chen; Yining Zhang; Limei Zhang; Lishan Qiao; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Alzheimer's Disease Classification Based on Image Transformation and Features Fusion.

Authors:  Hongfei Jia; Yu Wang; Yifan Duan; Hongbing Xiao
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  A parallel attention-augmented bilinear network for early magnetic resonance imaging-based diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Hao Guan; Chaoyue Wang; Jian Cheng; Jing Jing; Tao Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Late combination shows that MEG adds to MRI in classifying MCI versus controls.

Authors:  Delshad Vaghari; Ehsanollah Kabir; Richard N Henson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 7.400

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.