Literature DB >> 30872782

Skeletal muscle toxicity associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

L Janssen1,2, S J C M Frambach3,4, N A E Allard1, M T E Hopman1, T J J Schirris3,4, N C Voermans5, R J Rodenburg4,6, N M A Blijlevens7, S Timmers8,9.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30872782      PMCID: PMC6756217          DOI: 10.1038/s41375-019-0443-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


× No keyword cloud information.

To the Editor:

Up to 80% of CML patients using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) reports muscle complaints [1]. These muscle complaints are strongly related to the presence of fatigue and contributes to both diminished disease control [2] and impaired quality of life [3]. Although the mechanism by which TKIs cause muscle complaints is poorly understood, mitochondrial dysfunction has been suggested to play a pivotal role in TKI-induced cardiac muscle toxicity [4, 5]. We assessed whether TKIs disturb skeletal muscle mitochondrial density and function (cellular level), and if this translates into alterations in muscle contractile function (muscle tissue level) and maximal exercise performance (whole-body level). To gain a better insight into TKI-induced muscle complaints, these outcomes were compared between CML patients with and without muscle complaints. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants prior to study enrollment. This study was approved by the Local Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects of the region Arnhem and Nijmegen, the Netherlands and registered at The Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR6373). A total of twenty Ph+ CP-CML patients on TKI therapy aged ≥ 18 were recruited from the Department of Hematology at the Radboud University Medical Center (Nijmegen, The Netherlands). CML patients were assigned to a group with (CML + MC, N = 10) or without (CML - MC, N = 10) muscle complaints (MC) on the basis of presence, onset and course of muscle cramps, pain, and/or weakness. This was quantified on a Likert scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) resulting in significant different scores between CML + MC and CML - MC (median 4.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 3.0–4.0) and 2.5 (IQR 2.0–3.0), respectively; P = 0.002). The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) [6] was used to compare the degree of fatigue in CML patients, showing higher fatigue levels in CML + MC when compared to CML - MC (3.58 ± 2.19 and 0.95 ± 1.11, respectively; P = 0.005). Ten control participants were matched on group level for age, gender, BMI and physical activity level, assessed by The Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (SQUASH) [7]. Subjects were ineligible if they had hereditary muscle defects, diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, severe electrolyte disturbances, or used co-medication known to cause muscle symptoms or have an effect on mitochondrial function (e.g. statins, steroids, and metformin). Furthermore, subjects with contra-indications for maximal exercise testing according to the ACC/AHA guidelines [8] and muscle biopsy (e.g. anticoagulant therapy, bleeding disorders) were excluded. The demographic and hematological characteristics shown in Table 1 are not statistically significant different between CML patients and controls and between CML + MC and CML - MC, except for a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index [9] score in CML patients when compared to controls (median 2.0 (IQR 2.0–2.0) and 0.0 (IQR 0.0–0.0), respectively; P < 0.001) caused by the presence of CML. All participants completed the study protocol, i.e. a vastus lateralis muscle biopsy, electrical quadriceps femoris stimulations, and an incremental cycling test.
Table 1

Subject and hematological characteristics

CharacteristicsCML patientsControlsP valueCML + MCCML - MCP value
Subject number, N20101010
Gender, male/female14/67/31.007/37/31.00
Age, years54 ± 858 ± 70.2555 ± 954 ± 80.86
BMI, kg/m225.8 ± 4.127.5 ± 5.40.3425.8 ± 3.625.8 ± 4.80.97
Physical activity, METmin/week; median (IQR)2288 (1545–4982)2850 (1965–4868)0.532541 (1689–5488)2070 (1403–4570)0.63
Smoker, %0000
Age at Dx, years46 ± 8N/A47 ± 746 ± 90.78
BCR-ABL level, N (%)N/A1.00
 No MMR1 (5)1 (10)0 (0)
 MMR or deeper19 (95%)9 (90)10 (100)
TKI, N (%)0.89
 Imatinib10 (50)N/A6 (60)4 (40)
 Dasatinib5 (25)N/A2 (20)3 (30)
 Nilotinib2 (10)N/A1 (10)1 (10)
 Bosutinib2 (10)N/A1 (10)1 (10)
 Ponatinib1 (5)N/A0 (0)1 (10)
Duration of current TKI therapy, months; median (IQR)42.5 (21.0–114.8)N/A66.5 (19.0–121.5)38.0 (16.5–73.3)0.63
Prior TKIs, N; median (IQR)0.5 (0.0–1.0)N/A0.0 (0.0–1.0)1.0 (0.0–1.0)0.53
Charslon Comorbidity Index; median (IQR)2.0 (2.0–2.0)0.0 (0.0–0.0)<0.0012.0 (2.0–2.0)2.0 (2.0–2.0)0.74
Potassium, mmol/l3.9 ± 0.284.0 ± 0.200.503.9 ± 0.214.0 ± 0.340.76
Magnesium, mmol/l0.82 ± 0.060.84 ± 0.060.490.82 ± 0.050.83 ± 0.060.63
Phosphate, mmol/l0.82 ± 0.120.91 ± 0.170.110.83 ± 0.100.81 ± 0.150.75
Calcium, mmol/l2.29 ± 0.092.30 ± 0.060.682.29 ± 0.092.29 ± 0.100.91
Albumin, g/l38.7 ± 2.537.3 ± 2.00.1339.1 ± 2.838.3 ± 2.20.48
TSH, mE/l; median (IQR)2.1 (1.4–2.6)2.0 (1.3–2.8)0.902.0 (0.8–2.9)2.1 (1.5–2.7)0.61
CK, U/l; median (IQR)137 (89–236)120 (109–166)0.61169 (103–312)127 (84–216)0.90

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless indicated otherwise. There were no significant differences in subject and hematological characteristics between CML patients, except for a higher Charslon Comorbidity Index score in CML patients Also, there were no significant differences between CML patients with and without TKI induced muscle complaints

MC muscle complaints, BMI body mass index, MET metabolic equivalent of task, IQR interquartile range, Dx diagnosis, MMR major molecular response, TKI tyrosine kinase inhibitor, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone, CK creatine kinase

Subject and hematological characteristics Values are presented as mean ± SD unless indicated otherwise. There were no significant differences in subject and hematological characteristics between CML patients, except for a higher Charslon Comorbidity Index score in CML patients Also, there were no significant differences between CML patients with and without TKI induced muscle complaints MC muscle complaints, BMI body mass index, MET metabolic equivalent of task, IQR interquartile range, Dx diagnosis, MMR major molecular response, TKI tyrosine kinase inhibitor, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone, CK creatine kinase Vastus lateralis muscle needle biopsies were performed under local anesthesia in overnight fasted state and processed for mitochondrial measurements according to standard lab techniques as previously published [10]. Citrate synthase activity, a marker for mitochondrial density, was not different between CML patients and controls (195 ± 80 mU/mg protein and 171 ± 30 mU/mg protein, respectively, P = 0.24) and between CML + MC and CML - MC (P = 0.33). Furthermore, mitochondrial function, assessed by ATP production capacity (Fig. 1a, c) and [1-14C]-pyruvate oxidation rates in the presence of malate or carnitine (Fig. 1b, d) was not different between groups.
Fig. 1

Skeletal muscle mitochondrial function and muscle function parameters measured in CML patients and controls. a ATP production rate normalized to muscle protein content and (b) [1-14C]-pyruvate oxidation rates in the presence of malate and carnitine normalized to muscle protein content measured in mitochondrial fractions from fresh vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were not affected by TKI use. There were also no differences in (c) ATP production rate and (d) [1-14C]-pyruvate oxidation rates in the presence of malate and carnitine between CML + MC and CML - MC. e Force decline expressed as percentage of the prefatigue value during two minutes repetitive electrical stimulation of the quadriceps femoris muscle shows a higher level of muscle fatigue in CML patients compared to controls. Force responses are plotted every second during the complete (120 sec) fatigue protocol. f Maximal force rise after two minutes of electrical quadriceps femoris stimulation was significantly lower in CML + MC when compared to CML - MC. g Quadriceps femoris muscle in CML + MC showed a tendency toward longer relaxation time after two minute repetitive stimulation when compared to CML - MC. h Reported fatigue by CML patients (assessed by the Brief Fatigue Inventory) correlates with half relaxation time in quadriceps femoris muscle after two minutes repetitive electrical stimulation (N = 15). Data are presented as means ± SEM for a–d; and means ± SD for e–g. *P value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant

Skeletal muscle mitochondrial function and muscle function parameters measured in CML patients and controls. a ATP production rate normalized to muscle protein content and (b) [1-14C]-pyruvate oxidation rates in the presence of malate and carnitine normalized to muscle protein content measured in mitochondrial fractions from fresh vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were not affected by TKI use. There were also no differences in (c) ATP production rate and (d) [1-14C]-pyruvate oxidation rates in the presence of malate and carnitine between CML + MC and CML - MC. e Force decline expressed as percentage of the prefatigue value during two minutes repetitive electrical stimulation of the quadriceps femoris muscle shows a higher level of muscle fatigue in CML patients compared to controls. Force responses are plotted every second during the complete (120 sec) fatigue protocol. f Maximal force rise after two minutes of electrical quadriceps femoris stimulation was significantly lower in CML + MC when compared to CML - MC. g Quadriceps femoris muscle in CML + MC showed a tendency toward longer relaxation time after two minute repetitive stimulation when compared to CML - MC. h Reported fatigue by CML patients (assessed by the Brief Fatigue Inventory) correlates with half relaxation time in quadriceps femoris muscle after two minutes repetitive electrical stimulation (N = 15). Data are presented as means ± SEM for a–d; and means ± SD for e–g. *P value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant Maximal voluntary muscle strength of the dominant quadriceps femoris muscle [11], did neither differ between CML patients and controls (8.3 ± 2.0 N/kg and 7.9 ± 1.8 N/kg, respectively; P = 0.59), nor between CML + MC and CML-MC (P = 0.97). Resistance to fatigue was assessed by electrically stimulating the quadriceps femoris muscle repetitively at 40% of the MVC using 30 Hz bursts of one-second duration every other second for two minutes [11]. This fatigue protocol resulted in a significantly larger force decline in CML patients as compared to controls (31.8 ± 8.7% and 23.6 ± 7.7%, respectively; P = 0.010; Fig. 1e). Although a similar fatigability pattern was observed between CML + MC and CML - MC (force decline 29 ± 9% and 34 ± 9%, respectively; P = 0.24), the contractile properties of the quadriceps femoris muscle during repeated stimulation were explored in more detail. After two minutes of stimulation CML + MC showed a significantly lower maximal force rise (maximal slope of force increment normalized for peak force) compared to CML - MC (0.54 ± 0.10%/ms and 0.67 ± 0.13%/ms, respectively; P = 0.038; Fig. 1f) and a tendency toward longer half relaxation time (time taken for force to decline from 50 to 25% of the peak force; P = 0.07; Fig. 1g). The half relaxation time at the end of the fatigue protocol strongly correlated with reported fatigue (r = 0.72; P = 0.002; Fig. 1h). Since muscle relaxation is dependent upon the activity of sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA), an enzyme that mediates the re-uptake of calcium into the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) of skeletal muscle, SERCA activity was measured in whole-muscle homogenates [11]. However, no significant differences in SERCA activity were observed between CML + MC and CML - MC (98.9 (IQR 79.3–110.7 mU/mg) and 101.5 (IQR 77.0–109.8 mU/mg), respectively; P = 0.97). To measure whole-body fitness levels, all subjects performed an incremental cycle ergometer test (Lode Excalibur; Groningen, the Netherlands) with continuous ECG monitoring [10] to assess peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak). VO2peak was 34.6 ± 8.4 ml/kg/min (100 ± 9% predicted) in the CML patients, which was not different from the controls (VO2peak 35.6 ± 7.5 ml/kg/min, 100 ± 9% predicted; P = 0.75). In addition, no differences in VO2peak were observed between CML + MC and CML - MC (P = 0.38). Collectively, CML patients on TKI therapy show no signs of skeletal muscle mitochondrial dysfunction. However, quadriceps femoris muscle of TKI users fatigues to a larger extent upon repetitive stimulation when compared to controls. Changes in muscle contractile properties are associated with TKI-induced muscle complaints, as CML + MC show a significant lower maximal force rise and a tendency toward a delayed muscle relaxation after two minutes of electrical quadriceps femoris stimulations. CML patients did not have impaired maximal exercise performance. On a cellular level, no effects of TKI therapy on skeletal muscle mitochondrial density and function were found. These results are in line with the only previous clinical case report in which two CML patients, who had to interrupt or reduce therapy with nilotinib because of muscle pain, failed to show disturbances in mitochondrial oxidative enzyme reactions [12]. Intriguingly, in vitro studies in C2C12 myotubes showed no decline in ATP levels upon short-term imatinib incubation of 30 min [13], whereas long-term TKI-incubation of 24 h showed decreased ATP levels overtime [5, 13]. Disturbances in heart mitochondrial function are suggested to occur secondary to activation of a stress response in the endoplasmic reticulum [4]. Perhaps, in skeletal muscle, changes in the function of other cellular organelles also precede mitochondrial disturbances. In support of this hypothesis, CML patients on TKI therapy showed significantly more muscle fatigue than controls, and CML + MC showed delayed quadriceps femoris muscle force generation and a trend toward delayed relaxation in fatigued muscle compared to CML - MC. Since muscle fatigability, force generation, and relaxation are largely dependent on Ca2+ regelulation by the SR, changes in SR functioning may underlie these findings [14]. In that respect, disturbances in Ca2+ homeostasis [15], and SR abnormalities (i.e., dilated SR with membrane whorls) [4] have been found upon imatinib treatment in myocytes, but have never been linked to muscle complaints. Although we found no difference in SERCA activity between CML + MC and CML - MC, muscle half relaxation time after 2-min stimulation correlated positively with the perception of fatigue in CML patients, and may therefore be an important key for understanding the mechanism underlying fatigue in CML. To the best of our knowledge, maximal exercise capacity has not been assessed before in CML patients or other TKI-users. Compared to controls, CML patients do not have diminished maximal exercise capacity as measured by VO2peak and have similar physical activity levels as controls. VO2peak was also not different between CML + MC and CML - MC, despite higher subjective fatigue levels in CML + MC. These findings fit with the unaltered mitochondrial ATP production capacity, which is an important determinant of VO22peak. There are several limitations to this study. Due to the exploratory character of the study a relatively large number of measurements were performed in a small sample size. Therefore, results should be cautiously interpreted. Nonetheless, this design made it possible to examine the influence of TKIs on multiple levels (i.e. cellular, muscle tissue and whole body level) which offers broad insight into the effects of TKIs in CML patients. Secondly, participants were only included when they were able to perform all study measurements. Thus patients who were unable to perform exercise testing were excluded. Consequently, extreme cases of TKI-induced skeletal muscle complaints were not included in this study, which may have underestimated the results. This study provides important information concerning the effects of TKIs on skeletal muscle function and whole body fitness and lays foundation for further studies to elucidate the precise mechanism by which TKI therapy causes muscle complaints and affects muscle function.
  15 in total

1.  Contractile properties of the quadriceps muscle in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  H L Gerrits; A De Haan; M T Hopman; L H van Der Woude; D A Jones; A J Sargeant
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Effect of the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, dasatinib, sunitinib, and sorafenib on mitochondrial function in isolated rat heart mitochondria and H9c2 cells.

Authors:  Yvonne Will; James A Dykens; Sashi Nadanaciva; Brad Hirakawa; Joseph Jamieson; Lisa D Marroquin; James Hynes; Shem Patyna; Bart A Jessen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory.

Authors:  T R Mendoza; X S Wang; C S Cleeland; M Morrissey; B A Johnson; J K Wendt; S L Huber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Multitargeted kinase inhibitors imatinib, sorafenib and sunitinib perturb energy metabolism and cause cytotoxicity to cultured C2C12 skeletal muscle derived myotubes.

Authors:  Vijaya L Damaraju; Michelle Kuzma; Carol E Cass; Charles T Putman; Michael B Sawyer
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate.

Authors:  Risto Kerkelä; Luanda Grazette; Rinat Yacobi; Cezar Iliescu; Richard Patten; Cara Beahm; Brian Walters; Sergei Shevtsov; Stéphanie Pesant; Fred J Clubb; Anthony Rosenzweig; Robert N Salomon; Richard A Van Etten; Joseph Alroy; Jean-Bernard Durand; Thomas Force
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Imatinib activates pathological hypertrophy by altering myocyte calcium regulation.

Authors:  Larry A Barr; Catherine A Makarewich; Remus M Berretta; Hui Gao; Constantine D Troupes; Felix Woitek; Fabio Recchia; Hajime Kubo; Thomas Force; Steven R Houser
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.689

8.  Absence of histological myopathy in chronic myeloid leukemia patients complaining of muscle spasms and myalgia during treatment with nilotinib.

Authors:  Giovanni Caocci; Maria Antonietta Maioli; Sandra Atzeni; Rachele Piras; Nicola Carboni; Giorgio La Nasa
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.156

9.  Changes of myoplasmic calcium concentration during fatigue in single mouse muscle fibers.

Authors:  H Westerblad; D G Allen
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Patient-reported adverse drug reactions and their influence on adherence and quality of life of chronic myeloid leukemia patients on per oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment.

Authors:  Meri Kekäle; Marikki Peltoniemi; Marja Airaksinen
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Energy metabolism and drug response in myeloid leukaemic stem cells.

Authors:  Alfonso E Bencomo-Alvarez; Andres J Rubio; Mayra A Gonzalez; Anna M Eiring
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Myotoxicity Induced by Antiepileptic Drugs: Could be a Rare but Serious Adverse Event?

Authors:  Antonio Siniscalchi; Scott Mintzer; Giovambattista De Sarro; Luca Gallelli
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2021-11-03

3.  A Computational Framework to Characterize the Cancer Drug Induced Effect on Aging Using Transcriptomic Data.

Authors:  Yueshan Zhao; Yue Wang; Da Yang; Kangho Suh; Min Zhang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  Proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPases 1 (PSMD1) and 3 (PSMD3), play an oncogenic role in chronic myeloid leukemia by stabilizing nuclear factor-kappa B.

Authors:  Alfonso E Bencomo-Alvarez; Andres J Rubio; Idaly M Olivas; Mayra A Gonzalez; Rebecca Ellwood; Carme Ripoll Fiol; Christopher A Eide; Joshua J Lara; Christian Barreto-Vargas; Luis F Jave-Suarez; Georgios Nteliopoulos; Alistair G Reid; Dragana Milojkovic; Brian J Druker; Jane Apperley; Jamshid S Khorashad; Anna M Eiring
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Muscle wasting in cancer: opportunities and challenges for exercise in clinical cancer trials.

Authors:  Ciaran M Fairman; Simon Lønbro; Thomas D Cardaci; Brandon N VanderVeen; Tormod S Nilsen; Angela E Murphy
Journal:  JCSM Rapid Commun       Date:  2021-12-22

Review 6.  In Vivo Delivery of Nucleic Acid-Encoded Monoclonal Antibodies.

Authors:  Ami Patel; Mamadou A Bah; David B Weiner
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.807

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.