| Literature DB >> 30872744 |
Xin Zhang1, Zhihong Qiao1, Nannan Liu1,2, Lili Gao1, Liangpeng Wei1, Aili Liu1, Zengguang Ma1, Feifei Wang1, Shaowei Hou1, Jisheng Li1, Hui Shen3.
Abstract
Epilepsy is a multi-etiological brain dysfunction syndrome. Hippocampal neuronal damage induced by seizures may be one of the causes leading to cognitive impairment, but the underlying mechanism remains to be further elucidated. The kainic acid (KA) model of temporal lobe epilepsy is widely used in understanding of the epileptogenesis. Fiber photometry is a signal detection technology suitable for recording calcium activity of neurons in the deep brain of freely moving animal. Here, we used the optical fiber-based method to monitor the real-time neuronal population activities of freely moving mice after subcutaneous injection of KA. We observed that KA administration led to one to three kinds of stereotypical patterns of epileptiform calcium activity in CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus, as well as the entorhinal cortex (EC). There were three kinds of waves in the hippocampal CA1, which we named wave 1, wave 2 and slow flash. Wave 1 and wave 2 appeared in both the CA3 and DG regions, but the EC only showed wave 1. In these epileptiform calcium signals, we observed a high amplitude and long duration calcium wave as a part of wave 2, which resembled cortical spreading depression (CSD) and always appeared at or after the end of seizure. Because the same characteristic of epileptiform calcium signal appeared in different brain regions, calcium signal may not exist with region specificity, but may exhibit a cell type specific manner. Thus, our work provides a support for the pathogenesis of epilepsy and epileptiform signal transmission research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30872744 PMCID: PMC6418290 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41241-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Fiber photometry setup. (A) Schematic diagram of calcium signal recording system. The wavelength of emission filter and the dichroic filter was 472 nm ± 30 nm and 520 nm ± 36 nm. (B) Calcium signal and behavior of freely moving mice were recorded respectively and simultaneously, synchronized them with a LED mark to off-line analyze the correlation. (C) Schematic diagram showing the site on brain surface of optical fiber implanted in hippocampal CA1, CA3, DG and EC stained with OGB-1 AM.
Figure 2Specific calcium signal in hippocampal CA1. (A) Schematic diagram showing the optical fiber implanted stereotaxical center in hippocampal CA1, CA3 and DG. (B) Amplitude analyze for a calcium signal. (C) Examples showing the epileptiform calcium signal of CA1 in freely behaving mice lasted 1 h. There were three different types, that as wave1 (Orange box), wave2 (Red box) and slow flash (Green box). (D) Examples showing intercepting and amplifying epileptiform calcium signal before (Gray) and after KA administration, wave1 (Orange), wave2 (Red) and slow flash (Green).
Figure 3Specific calcium signal in hippocampus and EC. (A) Four kinds of calcium activities in hippocampal CA1. The amplitudes of these four kinds of calcium signals were as follows. Before KA: 0.65 ± 0.04% ∆F/F, wave1: 4.25 ± 0.35% ∆F/F, wave2: 11.83 ± 1.21% ∆F/F, slow flash: 4.03 ± 0.32% ∆F/F; before vs. wave1, ***p = 0.0001; before vs. wave2, ***p = 0.0002; before vs. slow flash, ***p = 0.0002; wave1 vs. wave2, *p = 0.0031; wave2 and slow flash, **p = 0.0014; n = 4 mice, Paired t-tests. The occurrence rates were as follows. Wave1: 1.06 ± 0.06 Hz, wave2: 1.66 ± 0.14 Hz, slow flash: 0.28 ± 0.03 Hz; wave1 vs. wave2, *p = 0.0108; wave1 vs. slow flash, ****p < 0.0001; wave2 vs. slow flash, ***p = 0.0002; n = 4 mice, Paired t-tests. (B) Three kinds of calcium activities in hippocampal CA3. The amplitudes of these three kinds of calcium signals were as follows. Before KA: 0.54 ± 0.11% ∆F/F, wave1: 2.86 ± 0.64% ∆F/F, wave2: 7.73 ± 1.45% ∆F/F; before vs. wave1, *p = 0.0148; before vs. wave2, **p = 0.0043; wave1 vs. wave2: *p = 0.02; n = 4 mice, Paired t-tests. The occurrence rates were as follows. Wave1: 0.92 ± 0.07 Hz, wave2: 1.68 ± 0.19 Hz; wave1 vs. wave2, *p = 0.0329; n = 4 mice, Paired t-tests. (C) Three kinds of calcium activities in hippocampal DG. The amplitudes of these three kinds of calcium signals were as follows. Before KA: 0.61 ± 0.04% ∆F/F, wave1: 1.53 ± 0.21 ∆F/F, wave2: 15.63 ± 2.04% ∆F/F; before vs. wave1, *p = 0.018; before vs. wave2, **p = 0.006; wave1 vs. wave2: **p = 0.0077; n = 4 mice, Paired t-tests. The occurrence rates were as follows. Wave1: 1.27 ± 0.13 Hz, wave2: 1.68 ± 0.54 Hz; wave1 vs. wave2, p = 0.51; n = 4 mice, Paired t-tests. (D) Two kinds of calcium activities in EC. The amplitudes of these two kinds of calcium signals were as follows. Before KA: 1.04 ± 0.05% ∆F/F, wave1: 4.15 ± 0.37% ∆F/F; before vs. wave1, ***p = 0.0009; n = 5 mice, Paired t-tests. And the occurrence rate of wave1 was 1.31 ± 0.29 Hz. Wave2 was divided into two parts, namely build-up (blue box) and CSD-like wave (grey box).
Figure 4Accurate localization of histology and fluorescence images. Brain samples documented the OGB-1AM staining and confirmed the relative position of the optical fiber in hippocampal CA1 (A), CA3 (B), DG (C) and EC (D). The bar is 0.5 mm.