Literature DB >> 30872035

Two-Stage Debridement With Prosthesis Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Andrew S Chung1, Matthew C Niesen1, Taylor J Graber1, Adam J Schwartz1, Christopher P Beauchamp1, Henry D Clarke1, Mark J Spangehl1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Historically, infection control rates with debridement and component retention have been poor in the management of acute prosthetic joint infections. We previously described a 2-stage debridement with prosthesis retention protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infection and reported a 90% success rate in a sample of 20 patients.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 83 patients who underwent a 2-stage debridement with implant retention with a minimum 1-year follow-up was performed. Patient data were primarily analyzed to determine infection control rates. Infections were considered controlled when patients had not undergone a reoperation for infection, and demonstrated lack of any clinical signs or symptoms of infection (a well healed wound, diminishing swelling and warmth, absence of erythema, improvement in baseline pain symptoms) A secondary goal of this study was to examine the effects of symptom duration on infection control rate.
RESULTS: Average patient follow-up was 41.8 months (range 12-171) for all patients. The overall protocol success rate was 86.7% (72/83): 82.9% in hips and 89.6% in knees. Additionally, protocol success was observed in 45 of 48 primary joints (93.8%) and 27 of 35 (77.1%) revision joints (P = .046). Average time from onset of symptoms to surgery was 6.2 days for successfully treated patients (range 0-27 days) compared to 10.7 days for those who failed treatment (range 1-28 days, P = .070).
CONCLUSION: This 2-stage retention protocol resulted in a higher likelihood of infection control compared to prior reports of single stage debridement and modular part exchange.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotic beads; hip arthroplasty; infection; irrigation and debridement; knee arthroplasty; prosthetic joint infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30872035     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Patients Who Undergo Early Aseptic Revision TKA Within 90 Days of Surgery Have a High Risk of Re-revision and Infection at 2 Years: A Large-database Study.

Authors:  Tony S Shen; Alex Gu; Patawut Bovonratwet; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Peter K Sculco; Edwin P Su
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  What's New in Musculoskeletal Infection.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Keith A Fehring; Angela Hewlett; Carlos A Higuera; Jesse E Otero; Aaron J Tande
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.558

3.  Fate of Two-Stage Reimplantation After Failed Irrigation and Debridement for Periprosthetic Hip Infection.

Authors:  Joseph J Kavolus; Daniel J Cunningham; Nima Eftekhary; Nicholas T Ting; William L Griffin; Thomas K Fehring
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-09-06

Review 4.  Risk factors affect success rate of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Yihong Xu; Liping Wang; Weidong Xu
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-12-07

5.  Early periprosthetic hip joint infection managed by cementless one-stage revision - a case series.

Authors:  Kristoffer Riemer; Jeppe Lange
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2022-02-25

6.  Cost-effectiveness of Single vs Double Debridement and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Model.

Authors:  Joseph K Antonios; Kevin J Bozic; Henry D Clarke; Mark J Spangehl; Joshua S Bingham; Adam J Schwartz
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-05

7.  The Double DAIR: A 2-Stage Debridement with Prosthesis-Retention Protocol for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Authors:  Kade S McQuivey; Joshua Bingham; Andrew Chung; Henry Clarke; Adam Schwartz; Jordan R Pollock; Christopher Beauchamp; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2021-02-04

8.  Acute or chronic periprosthetic joint infection? Using the ESR ∕ CRP ratio to aid in determining the acuity of periprosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Zachary K Christopher; Kade S McQuivey; David G Deckey; Jack Haglin; Mark J Spangehl; Joshua S Bingham
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-06-08

9.  Total Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the Setting of Hematologic Malignancy: Considerations for Management.

Authors:  G Barnes Bloom; Simon C Mears; Paul K Edwards; C Lowry Barnes; Jeffrey B Stambough
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-06-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.