Literature DB >> 30871846

Assessment of condylar changes after orthognathic surgery using computed tomography regional superimposition.

J D P Claus1, L Koerich2, A Weissheimer3, M S Almeida4, R Belle de Oliveira5.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of bimaxillary advancement orthognathic surgery on the condylar remodeling of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) using voxel-based regional superimposition of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). In this retrospective study, the sample comprised 56 condyles from 28 healthy patients (aged from 16 to 50years) with mandibular retrognathism treated with bimaxillary advancement. CBCT scans were taken preoperatively and at 14.3±4.2months postoperatively. The scans at the two time points were superimposed using regional voxel-based registration to assess condylar changes in the follow-up period. The linear alterations were measured in six different areas of each condyle to determine the pattern of condylar remodeling. Although no significant correlation was observed between changes in condylar surfaces, bone resorption occurred predominantly in the posterior and superior regions, while bone formation was predominantly on the anterior surface. Medial and lateral surfaces presented fewer bone changes. The overall bone changes were smaller than 1mm bilaterally in 21 patients (75%) and, considering each condyle individually, were smaller than 1mm in 48 condyles (85.7%). The results suggested that mild condylar remodeling in healthy patients is a common finding after orthognathic surgery. Future studies may clarify the mechanisms involved in the remodeling and help to understand the reasons for the remodeling pattern.
Copyright © 2019 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D image registration; CBCT superimposition; cone-beam CT; orthognathic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30871846     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Condylar Reshape in Orthognathic Surgery: Morphovolumetric and Densitometric Analysis Based on 3D Imaging and Digital Workflow.

Authors:  Vincenzo Abbate; Giovanni Audino; Giovanni Dell'Aversana Orabona; Marco Friscia; Paola Bonavolontà; Carmelo Lo Faro; Umberto Committeri; Carlos Navarro Cuéllar; Giorgio Iaconetta; Luigi Califano
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2022-02-09

2.  Comparison of surface- and voxel-based registration on the mandibular ramus for long-term three-dimensional assessment of condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Michael Boelstoft Holte; Henrik Sæderup; Else Marie Pinholt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Accuracy and reliability of maxillary digital model (MDM) superimposition in evaluating teeth movement in adults compared with CBCT maxillary superimposition.

Authors:  Yichen Pan; Xin Wang; Fanfan Dai; Gui Chen; Tianmin Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Disc repositioning by open suturing vs. mini-screw anchor: stability analysis when combined with orthognathic surgery for hypoplastic condyles.

Authors:  Jiangshan Hua; Chuan Lu; Jieyun Zhao; Zhi Yang; Dongmei He
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  A Novel Method to Combine Maxilla-Based Coordinate System and Mandibular Voxel-Based Superimposition with Cone-Bean Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Chenghao Zhang; Ling Ji; Yijun Li; Fangwei Pan; Wen Liao; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Incidence and management of condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery: An overview.

Authors:  Selene Barone; Giorgio Cosentini; Francesco Bennardo; Alessandro Antonelli; Amerigo Giudice
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.