H Ben Ayed1, M Koubaa2, S Yaich3, K Rekik2, T Ben Jemaa2, I Maaloul2, C Marrekchi2, J Damak3, M Ben Jemaa2. 1. Service de médecine communautaire et d'épidémiologie, université de Sfax, CHU Hédi Chaker, Sfax, Tunisia. Electronic address: drhoudabayed@gmail.com. 2. Service de maladies infectieuses, université de Sfax, CHU Hédi Chaker, Tunisia. 3. Service de médecine communautaire et d'épidémiologie, université de Sfax, CHU Hédi Chaker, Sfax, Tunisia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Several non-invasive markers have recently been proposed to predict liver fibrosis without percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB). We aimed to evaluate the performance of non-invasive scores and to highlight the value of a new combined score in the prediction of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients presenting with CHB who underwent PLB between 2008 and 2016. We calculated ASAT/Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 Score (FIB4), GGT-to-platelet ratio (GPR), and ASAT/ALAT Ratio (AAR). Then, we combined APRI and FIB-4 scores into a new combined score. We assessed their performance in predicting liver fibrosis according to the Metavir score. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients presenting with CHB were included. Multivariate analysis showed that the APRI score was the only independent factor of significant fibrosis (OR=3.78; P=0.02), whereas the FIB-4 score was the only independent factor for severe fibrosis (OR=2.85; P<0.001) and cirrhosis (OR=2.5; P=0.001). At a threshold of severe fibrosis, APRI had the best specificity (75%) and FIB-4 had the greatest sensitivity (74%). Using the combined score, we improved the diagnostic performance of APRI and FIB-4 scores at the three thresholds of liver fibrosis. With this combined score, maximum 25.1% of patients presenting with CHB would undergo PLB. CONCLUSION: APRI, FIB-4, and GPR scores were well performing to predict liver fibrosis during CHB. The new combined score using APRI and FIB-4 was more accurate at the three-fibrosis thresholds.
OBJECTIVES: Several non-invasive markers have recently been proposed to predict liver fibrosis without percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB). We aimed to evaluate the performance of non-invasive scores and to highlight the value of a new combined score in the prediction of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients presenting with CHB who underwent PLB between 2008 and 2016. We calculated ASAT/Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 Score (FIB4), GGT-to-platelet ratio (GPR), and ASAT/ALAT Ratio (AAR). Then, we combined APRI and FIB-4 scores into a new combined score. We assessed their performance in predicting liver fibrosis according to the Metavir score. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients presenting with CHB were included. Multivariate analysis showed that the APRI score was the only independent factor of significant fibrosis (OR=3.78; P=0.02), whereas the FIB-4 score was the only independent factor for severe fibrosis (OR=2.85; P<0.001) and cirrhosis (OR=2.5; P=0.001). At a threshold of severe fibrosis, APRI had the best specificity (75%) and FIB-4 had the greatest sensitivity (74%). Using the combined score, we improved the diagnostic performance of APRI and FIB-4 scores at the three thresholds of liver fibrosis. With this combined score, maximum 25.1% of patients presenting with CHB would undergo PLB. CONCLUSION: APRI, FIB-4, and GPR scores were well performing to predict liver fibrosis during CHB. The new combined score using APRI and FIB-4 was more accurate at the three-fibrosis thresholds.