Literature DB >> 30871678

Execution-time integration of clinical practice guidelines to provide decision support for comorbid conditions.

Borna Jafarpour1, Samina Raza Abidi2, William Van Woensel3, Syed Sibte Raza Abidi4.   

Abstract

Patients with multiple medical conditions (comorbidity) pose major challenges to clinical decision support systems, since the different Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) often involve adverse interactions, such as drug-drug or drug-disease interactions. Moreover, opportunities often exist for optimizing care and resources across multiple CPG. These challenges have been taken up in the state of the art, with many approaches focusing on the static integration of comorbid CIG. Nevertheless, we observe that many aspects often change dynamically over time, in ways that cannot be foreseen - such as delays in care tasks, resource availability, test outcomes, and acute comorbid conditions. To ensure the clinical safety and effectiveness of integrating multiple comorbid CIG, these execution-time difficulties must be considered. Further, when dealing with comorbid conditions, we remark that clinical practitioners typically consider multiple complex solutions, depending on the patient's health profile. Hence, execution-time flexibility, based on dynamic health parameters, is needed to effectively and safely cope with comorbid conditions. In this work, we introduce a flexible, knowledge-driven and execution-time approach to comorbid CIG integration, based on an OWL ontology with clearly defined integration semantics.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical decision support; Comorbid CIG integration; Computer interpretable guidelines; Execution-time CIG integration

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30871678     DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  3 in total

1.  Towards a framework for comparing functionalities of multimorbidity clinical decision support: A literature-based feature set and benchmark cases.

Authors:  Dympna O'Sullivan; William Van Woensel; Szymon Wilk; Samson W Tu; Wojtek Michalowski; Samina Abidi; Marc Carrier; Ruth Edry; Irit Hochberg; Stephen Kingwell; Alexandra Kogan; Martin Michalowski; Hugh O'Sullivan; Mor Peleg
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 2.  Pragmatic Considerations on Clinical Decision Support from the 2019 Literature.

Authors:  C Duclos; J Bouaud
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2020-08-21

Review 3.  Health information technology to improve care for people with multiple chronic conditions.

Authors:  Lipika Samal; Helen N Fu; Djibril S Camara; Jing Wang; Arlene S Bierman; David A Dorr
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.734

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.