Literature DB >> 30871375

Trends in Performance and Opportunities for Improvement on a Composite Measure of Acute Myocardial Infarction Care.

Nihar R Desai1,2, Jacob A Udell3, Yongfei Wang1,2, Erica S Spatz1,2, Kumar Dharmarajan1,2, Tariq Ahmad1, Howard M Julien4, Amarnath Annapureddy1,2, Abhinav Goyal5, James A de Lemos6, Frederick A Masoudi7, Deepak L Bhatt8, Karl E Minges1,2, Harlan M Krumholz1,2, Jeptha P Curtis1,2.   

Abstract

Background Despite improvements on individual process of care measures for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), little is known about performance on a composite measure of AMI care that assesses the delivery of many components of high-quality AMI care. We sought to examine trends in patient- and hospital-level performance on a composite defect-free care measure, identify disparities in the performance across sociodemographic groups, and identify opportunities to further improve quality and outcomes. Methods and Results We calculated the proportion of patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines (now known as the Chest Pain - Myocardial Infarction Registry) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, receiving defect-free AMI care including guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy, timely provision of medical and reperfusion therapy, assessment of ventricular function, referral to cardiac rehabilitation, and smoking cessation counseling for patients with AMI. A total of 522 800 patients at 222 hospitals were included. Overall, the proportion of patients receiving defect-free care significantly increased from 66.0% in 2010 to 77.1% in 2017 ( P<0.001). Improvements in performance were observed across all sociodemographic subgroups, with the greatest absolute improvement observed for black and Hispanic patients ( P<0.001). However, absolute performance was consistently lower among older patients, women, black and Hispanic patients, and those with government insurance in 2017 ( P<0.001 for all). Improvements in care and reduced variation in performance were observed at the hospital level overall (2010, median [IQR] 67.2% [40.7%-76.3%]; 2017, median [IQR] 80.7% [73.1%-88.1%]; P<0.001) as well as across region, safety net status, teaching status, and proportion of patients who are nonwhite and have Medicaid insurance coverage ( P<0.001 for all). Conclusions Despite improvements in the proportion of patients with AMI receiving defect-free care overall and across sociodemographic groups, nearly 1 in 4 patients in 2017 still did not receive optimal care and absolute performance was consistently lower among older patients, women, black, and Hispanic patients. Composite measures of cardiovascular care, which assess the delivery of several evidence-based processes of care, can illuminate opportunities to improve the quality of care beyond that provided by conventional process measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  healthcare disparities; myocardial infarction; quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30871375     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  5 in total

1.  Composite measures of quality of health care: Evidence mapping of methodology and reporting.

Authors:  Pinar Kara; Jan Brink Valentin; Jan Mainz; Søren Paaske Johnsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  MI-PACE Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation Program for Heart Attack Survivors: Usability Study.

Authors:  Eric Y Ding; Nathaniel Erskine; Wim Stut; David D McManus; Amy Peterson; Ziyue Wang; Jorge Escobar Valle; Daniella Albuquerque; Alvaro Alonso; Naomi F Botkin; Quinn R Pack; David D McManus
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-07-08

3.  Temporal Trends in Heart Failure Incidence Among Medicare Beneficiaries Across Risk Factor Strata, 2011 to 2016.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Nitin Kondamudi; Lin Zhong; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Joshua Parker; Sandeep R Das; Justin L Grodin; Ethan A Halm; Jarett D Berry; Ambarish Pandey
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01

4.  Smoking and Provision of Smoking Cessation Interventions among Inpatients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in China: Findings from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome Project.

Authors:  Guoliang Hu; Mengge Zhou; Jing Liu; Sidney C Smith; Changsheng Ma; Junbo Ge; Yong Huo; Gregg C Fonarow; Yongchen Hao; Jun Liu; Kathryn A Taubert; Louise Morgan; Na Yang; Yuhong Zeng; Yaling Han; Dong Zhao
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2020-10-23

5.  Switching warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: Insights from the NCDR PINNACLE registry.

Authors:  Christopher T Sciria; Thomas M Maddox; Lucas Marzec; Benjamin Rodwin; Salim S Virani; Amarnath Annapureddy; James V Freeman; Ali O'Hare; Yuyin Liu; Yang Song; Gheorghe Doros; Yue Zheng; Jane J Lee; Ramesh Daggubati; Lina Vadlamani; Christopher Cannon; Nihar R Desai
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.287

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.