Literature DB >> 30871338

How to Talk About Attitudes Toward the End of Life: A Qualitative Study.

Bernadette Groebe1,2, Christian Rietz3, Raymond Voltz2,4,5,6, Julia Strupp2.   

Abstract

To individually plan end-of-life care, open communication about a person's preferences and attitudes toward the end of life can facilitate dignity and quality of life in patients and relatives. To improve communication, structured guiding tools might be used as door openers. However, most tools focus on care preferences and decisions without assessing the person's underlying attitudes in detail. This study aims to get insights into specific requirements and conditions for communication about the end of life in various end-of-life care settings. Four focus groups were conducted with volunteers and professionals from nursing and psychosocial care (16 females, 2 males) working in hospice and palliative care and long-term care settings in Germany. A semistructured interview guideline on experiences and aspects associated with end-of-life conversations was used. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by a content analytic approach. Having end-of-life discussions primarily depended on a pleasant atmosphere, trusting bonds between conversation partners, and professional attitudes of staff members. Nursing home staff felt obligated to initiate conversations, but some reported insecurities doing so. Starting "early," including relatives, and having continuous discussions seemed beneficial for end-of-life conversations. Implementing conversations into existing care structures and using low-threshold impulses to start conversations were helpful. Individualized approaches should be preferred. Each staff member can be a partner in detailed conversations about end-of-life attitudes, but some felt unprepared doing so. Further skill training concerning end-of-life discussions is needed. Communication might be facilitated by open-format tools using low-threshold impulses when conditions of the care setting are considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes toward death; communication; interview; nursing homes; palliative care; patient-centered care; qualitative research

Year:  2019        PMID: 30871338     DOI: 10.1177/1049909119836238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  6 in total

Review 1.  Exploring the Uptake of Advance Care Planning in Older Adults: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Erica Frechman; Mary S Dietrich; Rachel Lane Walden; Cathy A Maxwell
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  The Role of Religion in Physician Outlook on Death, Dying, and End of Life Care.

Authors:  Simran Kripalani; John P Gaughan; Elizabeth Cerceo
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-01-02

3.  Use, usability, and impact of a card-based conversation tool to support communication about end-of-life preferences in residential elder care - a qualitative study of staff experiences.

Authors:  Therese Johansson; Carol Tishelman; Lars E Eriksson; Joachim Cohen; Ida Goliath
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Important End-of-Life Topics among Latino Patients and Caregivers Coping with Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Lianel Rosario-Ramos; Keishliany Suarez; Cristina Peña-Vargas; Yoamy Toro-Morales; Rosario Costas-Muñiz; Eida Castro; Stephanie Torres; Normarie Torres-Blasco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Community Education for a Dignified Last Phase of Life for Migrants: A Community Engagement, Mixed Methods Study among Moroccan, Surinamese and Turkish Migrants.

Authors:  Xanthe de Voogd; Dick L Willems; Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Marieke Torensma; Jeanine L Suurmond
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Positive attitudes to advance care planning - a Norwegian general population survey.

Authors:  Trygve Johannes L Sævareid; Reidar Pedersen; Morten Magelssen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.