| Literature DB >> 30871255 |
Bimal Kumar Ghimire1, Chang Yeon Yu2, Seung Hyun Kim3, Ill-Min Chung4.
Abstract
The genetic diversity and antioxidant potential of Panicum miliaceum L. accessions collected from different geo-ecological regions of South Korea were evaluated and compared. Antioxidant potential of seeds was estimated by the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2'-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging assays and total phenolic content was determined by the Folin⁻Ciocalteu method. Total phenolic content (TPC) in 80% methanolic extracts ranged from 16.24 ± 0.86 to 58.04 ± 1.00 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g of the sample extracts and total flavonoid content (TFC) varied from 7.19 ± 1.05 to 52.56 ± 1.50 mg quercetin equivalents (QE) mg/g of the sample extracts. DPPH radical scavenging capacity of the extracts from the 15 accessions of P. miliaceum varied from 206.44 ± 7.72 to 2490.24 ± 4.641 mg GAE/g of the sample extracts and ABTS radical scavenging capacity ranged from 624.85 ± 13.1 to 1087. 77 ± 9.58 mg GAE/g of the sample extracts. A wide range of genetic variation was observed as measured by Shannon's information index (I), number of effective alleles (Ne), number of observed alleles (Na), expected heterozygosity (He), unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe). The observed variation in the bioactive properties, morphological traits, and genetic diversity among the accessions may provide useful information for breeding programs seeking to improve bioactive properties of P. miliaceum.Entities:
Keywords: Panicum miliaceum; antioxidant activities; genetic diversity; morphological characteristics; phenolic content; total flavonoid content
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30871255 PMCID: PMC6470979 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24061012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Morphological characteristics of selected accessions of P. miliaceum.
| Accession | Bloom Begin (Days) | Full Bloom (Days) | Plant Height (cm) | No. of Leaves | Leaf Length (cm) | Leaf Width (cm) | Ratio (L/B) | Culm Length (cm) | Stem Diameter (cm) ** | Spike Length (cm) | Spike Width (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM-01 | 85.33±1.53 a | 92.33 ± 1.40 a | 137.03 ± 2.00 h | 6.0 ± 1.0 d | 38.3 ± 1.8 c | 2.4 ± 0.4 e | 15.96 | 92.00 ± 4.00 e,f | 0.8 ± 0.2 c | 4.5 ± 0.5 h | 45.0 ± 3.0 k |
| PM-02 | 85.67 ± 3.06 a | 91.67 ± 1.50 a | 170.43 ± 2.50 l | 8.0 ± 1.0 h | 52.2 ± 0.4 j | 3.0 ± 0.2 f | 17.40 | 135.50 ± 3.50 i | 1.3 ± 0.1 h | 4.9 ± 0.1 i | 34.8 ± 2.8 a |
| PM-03 | 92.67 ± 1.15 b | 99.33 ± 1.70 b | 115.23 ± 2.10 c | 4.5 ± 0.5 a | 48.0 ± 1.0 h | 3.3 ± 0.5 h | 14.55 | 79.80 ± 2.30 c | 0.9 ± 0.2 d | 3.7 ± 0.2 f | 35.8 ± 3.3 b |
| PM-04 | 99.67 ± 2.08 c | 105.67 ± 1.53 c | 140.30 ± 3.0 k | 5.0 ± 1.0 b | 51.5 ± 2.5 i | 3.3 ± 0.6 h | 15.61 | 96.50 ± 3.50 g | 1.1 ± 0.1 f | 3.3 ± 0.2 c | 44.3 ± 1.8 k |
| PM-05 | 98.67 ± 1.53 c | 106.33 ± 1.53 c | 123.13 ± 2.50 d | 6.5 ± 0.5 e | 40.8 ± 2.8 e | 2.2 ± 0.1 d | 18.51 | 86.80 ± 3.30 d | 0.7 ± 0.1 b | 3.5 ± 0.5 e | 36.5 ± 1.5 c |
| PM-06 | 85.67 ± 3.06 a | 92.33 ± 1.67 a | 135.20 ± 3.0 g | 5.5 ± 0.5 c | 43.5 ± 1.5 f | 3.0 ± 0.0 f | 14.50 | 94.50 ± 4.50 f,g | 1.0 ± 0.0 e | 3.3 ± 0.1 c | 41.0 ± 1.0 h |
| PM-07 | 93.33 ± 3.51 b | 100.00 ± 1.80 b | 186.30 ± 3.50 n | 7.5 ± 0.5 g | 54.0 ± 2.0 l | 3.2 ± 0.2 g | 18.00 | 148.50 ± 1.50 j | 1.4 ± 0.1 i | 4.5 ± 0.5 h | 38.3 ± 1.3 e |
| PM-08 | 84.33 ± 2.08 a | 92.00 ± 2.00 a | 112.33 ± 1.50 b | 5.5 ± 0.5 c | 31.0 ± 2.0 a | 2.10 ± 0.1 b c | 14.76 | 77.00 ± 3.00 b | 0.4 ± 0.0 a | 3.1 ± 0.3 b | 35.5 ± 1.5 b |
| PM-09 | 85.33 ± 1.53 a | 92.00 ± 1.50 a | 111.03 ± 2.00 a | 6.5 ± 0.5 e | 45.0 ± 3.0 g | 3.07 ± 0.1 f | 14.66 | 74.00 ± 2.00 a | 1.1 ± 0.1 f | 2.6 ± 0.6 a | 37.0 ± 3.0 d |
| PM-10 | 93.67 ± 2.08 b | 99.67 ± 1.00 b | 128.30 ± 2.50 e | 7.0 ± 0.5 f | 54.17 ± 2.0 l | 3.09 ± 0.1 f | 17.53 | 90.00 ± 2.00 e | 1.41 ± 0.3 i | 4.4 ± 0.6 h | 38.9 ± 1.1 e |
| PM-11 | 93.33 ± 1.53 b | 100.00 ± 1.20 b | 138.03 ± 1.90 i | 7.5 ± 0.5 g | 43.5 ± 1.5 f | 1.9 ± 0.1 a | 22.89 | 95.80 ± 1.30 g | 0.9 ± 0.0 d | 4.5 ± 0.5 h | 42.3 ± 2.8 i |
| PM-12 | 93.33 ± 2.51 b | 100.00 ± 2.00 b | 182.27 ± 2.50 m | 8.5 ± 0.5 i | 53.0 ± 1.0 k | 3.4 ± 0.1 i | 15.59 | 130.30 ± 1.80 h | 1.3 ± 0.2 h | 5.0 ± 1.0 j | 52.5 ± 7.5 m |
| PM-13 | 92.67 ± 2.51 b | 100.00 ± 2.00 b | 139.00 ± 2.00 j | 4.5 ± 0.5 a | 39.3 ± 1.8 d | 2.17 ± 0.1 c,d | 18.11 | 92.50 ± 4.50 e,f | 1.4 ± 0.3 i | 3.8 ± 0.8 g | 46.5 ± 0.5 l |
| PM-14 | 85.00 ± 2.00 a | 91.67 ± 1.00 a | 115.15 ± 3.00 c | 6.5 ± 0.5 e | 32.5 ± 2.5 b | 2.2 ± 0.4 d | 14.77 | 75.50 ± 1.50 a b | 0.8 ± 0.0 c | 3.4 ± 0.6 d | 39.5 ± 2.5 f |
| PM-15 | 85.00 ± 2.00 a | 91.67 ± 2.10 a | 133.78 ± 1.80 f | 6.5 ± 0.5 e | 45.5 ± 2.5 g | 2.07 ± 0.2 b | 21.98 | 92.50 ± 2.50 e,f | 1.2 ± 0.1 g | 3.5 ± 0.5 e | 40.5 ± 0.5 g |
** Experimental data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data having the same letter in a row were not significantly different as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Morphological characteristics of the selected accessions of P. miliaceum.
| Accession | Weight of 1000 Seed (g) *** | Seed Color ** | Tiller Number | Leaf Orientation * | Color of Leaves |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM-01 | 5.43 ± 0.15 f | 3 | 1 | 1 | Green |
| PM-02 | 5.95 ± 0.45 h | 1 | 1 | 3 | Green |
| PM-03 | 4.41 ± 0.10 a | 1 | 2 | 2 | Light |
| PM-04 | 5.24 ± 0.05 e | 2 | 1 | 1 | Green |
| PM-05 | 4.92 ± 0.25 b | 3 | 1 | 2 | Green |
| PM-06 | 5.43 ± 0.70 f | 5 | 2 | 1 | Green |
| PM-07 | 5.75 ± 0.05 g | 3 | 1 | 2 | Green |
| PM-08 | 6.36 ± 0.06 i | 3 | 1 | 2 | Light |
| PM-09 | 5.07 ± 0.11 c,d | 2 | 1 | 2 | Light |
| PM-10 | 5.72 ± 0.11 g | 2 | 1 | 2 | Green |
| PM-11 | 5.04 ± 0.05 b,c | 2 | 1 | 2 | Green |
| PM-12 | 5.19 ± 0.08 d,e | 2 | 2 | 2 | Light |
| PM-13 | 5.75 ± 0.03 g | 1 | 2 | 2 | Dark green |
| PM-14 | 5.74 ± 0.06 g | 5 | 2 | 2 | Dark green |
| PM-15 | 5.79 ± 0.04 g | 5 | 2 | 3 | Dark green |
* 1 = Slightly above the horizontal axis, 2 = almost horizontal with respect to the stem, 3 = slightly below the horizontal axis pointing downwards. ** 1 = Cream, 2 = Yellow, 3 = Orange red, 4 = Brown, 5 = Dark brown. *** Experimental data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data having the same letter in a row were not significantly different as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the main morphological characteristics in P. miliaceum accessions.
| Analytes | Bloom Begin ** | Full Bloom | Culm Length | Stem Diameter | No. of Leaves | Leaf Length | Leaf Width | Plant Height | Ratio of L/W | Weight of 1000 Seeds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloom begin | 1 | 0.995 ** | 0.190 | 0.229 | −0.041 | 0.453 * | 0.261 | 0.420 * | −0.092 | −0.482 |
| Full bloom | 1 | 0.157 | 0.172 | −0.071 | 0.383 | 0.202 | 0.188 | −0.111 | −0.477 | |
| Culm length | 1 | 0.595 * | 0.626 * | 0.652 ** | 0.425 | 0.980 ** | −0.420 | 0.192 | ||
| Stem diameter | 1 | 0.315 | 0.764 ** | 0.487 | 0.621 * | −0.031 | 0.066 | |||
| No. of leaves | 1 | 0.416 | 0.122 | 0.608 * | −0.222 | 0.142 | ||||
| Leaf length | 1 | 0.763 ** | 0.630 * | −0.069 | −0.249 | |||||
| Leaf width | 1 | 0.404 | −0.089 | −0.305 | ||||||
| Plant height | 1 | −0.381 | 0.164 | |||||||
| Ratio of L/W | 1 | −0.288 | ||||||||
| Weight of 1000 seeds | 1 |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 1Variation in spike morphology in the 15 accessions of P. miliaceum studied.
Average concentration of chlorophyll pigments of the selected accessions of P. miliaceum grown in the field.
| Accession | Chl a (µg/mL−1) | Chl b (µg/mL−1) | Ratio of Chl a and Chl b | Carotenoid ** (µg/mL−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM-01 | 412.67 ± 7.02 c,d | 20.96 ± 3.00 a | 19.49 ± 1.61 b,c | 13.49 ± 1.01 a |
| PM-02 | 628.15 ± 6.53 k | 36.82 ± 2.56 f | 16.95 ± 0.41 a | 13.26 ± 0.67 a |
| PM-03 | 504.44 ± 5.50 e | 27.74 ± 2.53 b | 18.29 ± 0.95 a,b | 13.56 ± 0.96 a |
| PM-04 | 607.03 ± 7.00 j | 35.60 ± 1.51 d,e,f | 17.15 ±0.60 a | 12.91 ± 1.83 a |
| PM-05 | 594.96 ± 5.56 i | 34.28 ± 2.06 c,d,e,f | 17.25 ± 0.71 a | 12.81 ± 0.20 a |
| PM-06 | 521.44 ± 6.50 f,g | 29.72 ± 2.06 b,c | 17.35 ± 0.70 a | 12.44 ± 0.45 a |
| PM-07 | 552.16 ± 7.01 h | 31.11 ± 3.01 b,c,d | 17.45 ± 0.74 a,b | 12.86 ± 0.81 a |
| PM-08 | 523.79 ± 5.64 g | 29.01 ± 3.00 b | 18.16 ± 0.71 a,b | 12.71 ± 1.14 a |
| PM-09 | 625.05 ± 5.00 k | 35.96 ± 2.62 e,f | 17.66 ± 0.83 a,b | 12.64 ± 0.55 a |
| PM-10 | 403.44 ± 6.08 b,c | 19.61 ± 3.51 a | 20.49 ± 1.55 c,d | 12.69 ± 0.82 a |
| PM-11 | 372.75 ± 7.51 a | 17.56 ± 1.50 a | 21.61 ± 1.24 d | 12.54 ± 0.50 a |
| PM-12 | 398.93 ± 9.00 b | 19.53 ± 2.50 a | 20.31 ± 1.75 c,d | 12.21 ± 0.62 a |
| PM-13 | 559.17 ± 4.54 h | 31.71 ± 1.54 b,c,d,e | 17.78 ± 1.16 a,b | 12.59 ± 0.53 a |
| PM-14 | 422.08 ± 6.54 d | 21.55 ± 2.50 a | 19.53 ± 1.14 b,c | 13.56 ± 0.75 a |
| PM-15 | 511.94 ± 8.00 e,f | 29.50 ± 3.12 b | 17.28 ± 0.75 a | 12.45 ± 0.51 a |
** Experimental data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data having the same letter in a row were not significantly different as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Principal component analysis in the 15 accessions in P. miliaceum studied based on morphological characteristics.
Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of selected accessions of P. miliaceum.
| Accession | TPC 1 (mg/g) | TFC 2 (mg/g) | DPPH (µg/mL) | ABTS (µg/mL) ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM-01 | 24.62 ±1.21 d | 11.82 ± 1.05 c,d,e | 1881.53 ± 19.82 h | 888.49 ± 8.05 h |
| PM-02 | 31.32±1.15 f | 13.28 ± 1.11 e,f | 1861.66 ± 7.63 g | 716.59 ± 7.66 d |
| PM-03 | 46.01 ± 1.00 h | 19.58 ± 1.51 g | 2304.24 ± 5.17 k | 883.63 ± 5.70 g,h |
| PM-04 | 15.97 ± 0.95 a | 7.19 ± 1.05 a | 2490.24 ± 4.64 l | 1087.77 ± 9.58 j |
| PM-05 | 58.04 ± 1.00 e | 52.56 ± 1.50 d,e | 206.44 ± 7.72 a | 688.08 ± 7.56 c |
| PM-06 | 49.81 ± 1.25 b | 38.33 ± 1.15 a,b | 316.39 ± 13.22 b | 673.77 ± 6.01 g |
| PM-07 | 16.24 ± 0.86 a | 7.22 ± 1.75 a | 858.77 ± 6.37 c | 822.74 ± 7.51 f |
| PM-08 | 23.36 ± 0.60 c,d | 10.43 ± 1.78 b,c.d | 978.80 ± 9.01 d | 719.58 ± 5.05 d |
| PM-09 | 30.44 ± 0.67 f | 13.08 ± 1.01 e,f | 1452. 96 ± 6.00 f | 688.19 ± 9.11 c |
| PM-10 | 24.30 ± 0.62 d | 10.92 ± 1.01 c,d,e | 1964.58 ± 9.03 i | 772.54 ± 7.50 e |
| PM-11 | 23.07 ± 1.00 c,d | 10.35 ± 1.52 b,c,d | 1967.33 ± 8.08 i | 706.46 ± 6.50 d |
| PM-12 | 29.43 ± 2.67 e,f | 15.02 ± 1.00 f | 2245.59 ± 8.50 j | 932.55 ± 5.74 i |
| PM-13 | 21.61 ± 0.54 b,c | 9.61 ± 1.51 b,c | 1447.61 ± 11.66 f | 682.36 ± 5.85 c |
| PM-14 | 36.85 ± 0.97 g | 9.79 ± 1.64 b,c | 1262.96 ± 7.54 e | 624.85 ± 13.14 a |
| PM-15 | 31.42 ± 0.61 f | 15.40 ± 0.96 f | 1436.89 ± 7.00 f | 657.57± 7.50 b |
** Experimental data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data having the same letter in a row were not significantly differed by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: TPC, total phenolic content; TFC, total flavonoid content; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS. 1 TPC is given as gallic acid equivalent (GAE) mg/g of the extracts and fractions, values are the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate tests. 2 TFC is given as quercetin equivalent (QE) mg/g of the extracts and fractions, values are the mean ± standard deviation of triplicates.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the antioxidant activity and total phenolic content and total flavonoid content in P. miliaceum accessions.
| Analytes | TPC 1 | TFC | DPPH | ABTS | Chl a | Chl b | Ratio of Chl a and b | Carotenoid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPC | 1 | 0.886 ** | 0.732 ** | 0.370 | 0.122 | 0.137 | −0.221 | 0.123 |
| TFC | 1 | 0.933 ** | 0.268 | 0.223 | 0.237 | −0.299 | −0.138 | |
| DPPH | 1 | 0.337 | 0.291 | 0.299 | −0.357 | −0.169 | ||
| ABTS | 1 | 0.064 | 0.073 | −0.092 | −0.127 | |||
| Chl a | 1 | 0.997 ** | −0.912 ** | 0.017 | ||||
| Chl b | 1 | −0.935 ** | 0.013 | |||||
| Ratio of Chl a and b | 1 | −0.06 | ||||||
| Carotenoid | 1 |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 1 Abbreviations: TPC, total phenolic content; TFC, total flavonoid content; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); Chl a, chlorophyll a; Chl b, chlorophyll b.
Figure 3Banding pattern generated by the ISSR-844 primer. M: DNA ladder, 1–15 represent the DNA banding pattern of fifteen accessions of P. miliaceum.
Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers used for determining the genetic diversity of P. miliaceum.
| ISSR Primer | Base Sequence (5′-3′) | Total Amplicon | No. of Polymorphic Amplicon | Percentage of Polymorphism (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBC809 | (AGA GAG)2AGA GG | 15 | 12 | 80.00 |
| UBC811 | (GAG AGA)2GAG AC | 6 | 3 | 50.00 |
| UBC818 | (CAC ACA)2CAC AG | 8 | 3 | 37.50 |
| UBC820 | (GTG TGT)2GTG TC | 3 | 3 | 100.00 |
| UBC827 | (ACA CAC)2ACA CG | 10 | 5 | 50.00 |
| UBC824 | (TCT CTC)2TCT CG | 4 | 2 | 50.00 |
| UBC829 | (TGT GTG)2TGT GC | 4 | 3 | 75.00 |
| UBC841 | (GAG AGA)2GAG AYC | 8 | 7 | 87.50 |
| UBC844 | (CTC TCT)2CTC TRC | 9 | 6 | 66.67 |
| UBC850 | (GTG TGT)2GTG TYC | 6 | 6 | 100.00 |
| ISSR2 | (GAG)6C | 11 | 11 | 100.00 |
| ISSR3 | (GAC)6T | 9 | 6 | 66.67 |
| ISSR4 | (GACA)5 | 3 | 2 | 66.67 |
| ISSR5 | (GTC)6A | 6 | 4 | 66.67 |
| ISSR6 | (GTG)6C | 6 | 4 | 66.67 |
| ISSR8 | (GTG)6A | 7 | 3 | 42.86 |
| ISSR9 | A(CACA)3CACTG | 4 | 2 | 50.00 |
| ISSR10 | (GAC)6 | 4 | 4 | 100.00 |
| ISSR11 | (GACA)4 | 9 | 6 | 66.67 |
| ISSR12 | (CTC)7A | 5 | 4 | 80.00 |
| ISSR13 | (GACA)4A | 8 | 2 | 25.00 |
| ISSR14 | (TC)8AG | 7 | 6 | 85.79 |
| ISSR15 | TG(TACA)4 | 6 | 6 | 100.00 |
| Total | 158 | 110 | 70.16 |
RAPD marker used for genetic diversity of P. miliaceum.
| ISSR Primer | Base Sequence (5′-3′) | Total Amplicon | No. of Polymorphic Amplicon | Percentage of Polymorphism (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAPD1 | CCAGCCGAAC | 4 | 3 | 75 |
| RAPD2 | ATGGATCCGC | 4 | 3 | 75 |
| RAPD3 | BTTGCCAGCC | 5 | 5 | 100 |
| RAPD4 | AGGGAACGAG | 4 | 4 | 100 |
| RAPD5 | AGCGCCATTG | 9 | 8 | 88.89 |
| RAPD6 | CCAAGCTGCC | 2 | 1 | 50 |
| RAPD7 | ACCCGGTCAC | 7 | 6 | 85.71 |
| RAPD8 | GGGCTCATAG | 4 | 3 | 75 |
| RAPD9 | ATGGATCCGC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RAPD10 | AGGTGAACGG | 3 | 2 | 66.67 |
| RAPD11 | CGAGTGCCTA | 4 | 4 | 100 |
| Total | 46 | 39 | 91.67 |
Figure 4Banding pattern generated by the RAPD-1 primer. M: DNA ladder, 1-15 represent the DNA banding pattern of fifteen accessions of P. miliaceum.
Summary of genetic variation estimated using RAPD and ISSR markers among the P. miliaceum accessions.
| Molecular Marker | N | Na * | Ne | I | He | uHe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISSR + RAPD | 206 | 2.00 ± 0.00 a | 1.700 ± 0.018 c | 0.601 ± 0.007 c | 0.411 ± 0.006 c | 0.412 ± 0.006 c |
| RAPD | 46 | 2.00 ± 0.00 a | 1.662 ± 0.048 a | 0.578 ± 0.290 a | 0.391 ± 0.018 a | 0.396 ± 0.010 a |
| ISSR | 160 | 2.00 ± 0.00 a. | 1.675 ± 0.015 b | 0.581 ± 0.006 b | 0.395 ± 0.006 b | 0.408 ± 0.006 b |
Abbreviations: N = No. of loci, Na = No. of Different Alleles, Ne = No. of Effective Alleles, I = Shannon’s Information Index, He = Expected Heterozygosity, uHe = Unbiased Expected Heterozygosity, ISSR = inter-simple sequence repeat, RAPD = random amplified polymorphic DNA. * Experimental data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data having the same letter in a row were not significantly differed by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Location of P. miliaceum accessions collected from different provinces of South Korea.
| Sl. No. | Accession | Code | Collection Site | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PM-01 | Hwacheon-myeon, Hongcheon-gun | South Korea | |
| 2 | PM-02 | Hoengseong-gun, anheungmyeon saemal | South Korea | |
| 3 | PM-03 | Chuncheonsi dongsanmyeon gunjali | South Korea | |
| 4 | PM-04 | Hoengseong-gun, gabcheonmyeon yuldongli | South Korea | |
| 5 | PM-05 | Kangwondo, hwacheongun gandongmyeon o-eum2li | South Korea | |
| 6 | PM-06 | Kangwondo, injegun, nammyeon bupyeongli | South Korea | |
| 7 | PM-07 | Kangwondo, hongcheongun seoseogmyeon saeng-gog1li | South Korea | |
| 8 | PM-08 | Kangwondo, yang-yang-gun seomyeon hwang-ili | South Korea | |
| 9 | PM-09 | Kangwondo, yang-yang-gun ganghyeonmyeon jeonjin1li | South Korea | |
| 10 | PM-10 | Kangwondo, hongcheongun nammyeon wolcheonli | South Korea | |
| 11 | PM-11 | Kyeongido, yangpyeong-gun cheong-unmyeon bilyong2li | South Korea | |
| 12 | PM-12 | Kangwondo, hwacheongun sangseomyeon mahyeonli | South Korea | |
| 13 | PM-13 | Kangwondo, pyeongchang-gun daehwamyeon haan3li | South Korea | |
| 14 | PM-14 | Kangwondo, pyeongchang-gun daehwamyeon haan5li | South Korea | |
| 15 | PM-15 | Kangwondo, pyeongchang-gun daehwamyeon haan4li | South Korea |
Figure 5Dendrogram using UPGMA clustering procedures in 15 P. miliaceum accessions based on combined ISSR and RAPD markers.
Figure 6Dendrogram using UPGMA clustering procedures in 15 P. miliaceum accessions based on RAPD markers.
Figure 7Dendrogram using UPGMA clustering procedures in 15 P. miliaceum accessions based on combined ISSR and RAPD markers.