| Literature DB >> 30871195 |
Urban Ajdnik1, Lidija Fras Zemljič2, Matej Bračič3, Uroš Maver4, Olivija Plohl5, Janez Rebol6.
Abstract
Silicones are widely used medical materials that are also applied forEntities:
Keywords: antimicrobial activity; chitosan; drug delivery; nanoparticles; silicone; tympanostomy tube
Year: 2019 PMID: 30871195 PMCID: PMC6471903 DOI: 10.3390/ma12060847
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
List of abbreviations and their descriptions. Samples notation is given in the same table.
|
|
|
| CFU | Colony-forming units |
| CoAM | Co-amoxiclav |
| DLS | Dynamic light scattering |
| EE | Encapsulation efficiency |
| HSA | Human serum albumin |
| MIC | Minimal inhibitory concentration |
| PBS | Phosphate buffered saline |
| PDI | Polydispersity index |
| PDMS | Polydimethylsiloxane |
| PET | Polyethylene terephthalate |
| PVP | Polyvinylpyrrolidone |
| SEM | Scanning electron microscope |
| TPP | Sodium tripolyphosphate |
| TSA | Tryptic soy agar |
| UB | Ultrasonic bath |
| UV-Vis | Ultraviolet-visible |
| XPS | X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy |
| ZP | ζ-potential |
|
| |
| CN | Chitosan and TPP nanoparticles (CN) |
| CN-CoAM | CN with encapsulated CoAM (CN-CoAM) |
| PDMSCN | PDMS carrier, CN coating |
| PDMSCN-CoAM | PDMS carrier, CN-CoAM coating |
| PDMSPA1, CN | PDMS carrier, O2 plasma activated for 1 min (PA1), CN coating |
| PDMSPA1,CN-CoAM | PDMS carrier, O2 plasma activated for 1 min (PA1), CN-CoAM coating |
| PDMSPA2,CN | PDMS carrier, O2 plasma activated for 2 min (PA2), CN coating |
| PDMSPA2,CN-CoAM | PDMS carrier, O2 plasma activated for 2 min (PA2), CN-CoAM coating |
| PDMSPA3, CN | PDMS carrier, O2 plasma activated for 3 min (PA3), CN coating |
| PDMSPA3, CN-CoAM | PDMS carrier, O2 plasma activated for 3 min (PA3), CN-CoAM coating |
| PDMSPA5 | PDMS carrier, O2 plasma activated for 5 min (PA5) |
| PDMSPA5, CN-CoAM | PDMS carrier, O2 plasma activated for 5 min (PA5), CN-CoAM coating |
dh, ZP and PDI of CN particles before ultrasonic bath along with CN and CN-CoAM particles after ultrasonic bath.
| CN before UB | CN after UB | CN-CoAM after UB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| dh (nm) | 1470.53 | 379.70 | 514.43 |
| ζ (mV) | 27.00 | 32.43 | 5.40 |
| PDI | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.48 |
Figure 1Binding energy peaks of elements of neat inactivated silicone PDMS, PDMSCN and PDMSCN-CoAM (a). Binding energy peaks of elements of PDMS and O2 plasma (PDMSPA5) activated silicone (b).
Elemental analysis of the coated and inactivated silicone surfaces by XPS (the surface depth ≈ 10 nm).
| Sample | Atomic Percentage of Elements (at.%) * | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | N | O | Na | Si | P | S | Cl | |
| PDMS | 47.4 | - | 28.8 | - | 24.1 | - | - | - |
| PDMSCN | 46.4 | 0.6 | 29.2 | - | 23.8 | - | - | - |
| PDMSCN-CoAM | 55.2 | 1.4 | 24.3 | 1.0 | 16.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.5 |
* The standard deviation was within the range 1–3%.
Figure 2XPS analyses: Binding energy peaks of elements of O2 plasma-activated silicone for 1 min (a), 2 min (b), 3 min (c) and 5 min (d), coated by chitosan nanoparticles alone or in combination with the drug.
Elemental analysis of the plasma-activated silicone surfaces (1 min, 2 min, 3 min and 5 min) coated by chitosan nanoparticles alone, or in combination with the drug by XPS.
| Sample | Atomic Percentage of Elements (at.%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | N | O | Na | Si | P | S | |
| PDMSPA1,CN | 49.1 | 4.0 | 32.2 | 0.2 | 11.9 | 0.5 | - |
| PDMSPA1,CN-CoAM | 53.9 | 4.0 | 24.8 | 1.8 | 12.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| PDMSPA2,CN | 35.8 | 2.2 | 39.9 | 0.1 | 21.7 | 0.2 | - |
| PDMSPA2,CN-CoAM | 54.5 | 5.1 | 24.7 | 1.7 | - | - | 1.4 |
| PDMSPA3,CN | 44.6 | 3.4 | 35.8 | 0.3 | 15.5 | 0.4 | - |
| PDMSPA3,CN-CoAM | 52.7 | 3.8 | 23.9 | 2.8 | - | - | 1.2 |
| PDMSPA5,CN | 56.2 | 5.1 | 29.8 | - | 8.1 | 0.9 | - |
| PDMSPA5,CN-CoAM | 54.8 | 5.5 | 24.9 | 1.5 | 10.9 | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| PDMSPA5 | 13.9 | - | 55.8 | - | 30.3 | - | - |
Figure 3SEM images of the bare PDMS film (a), PDMSCN (b) and PDMSCN-CoAM (c), PDMSPA5, CN (d) and PDMSPA5,CN-CoAM (e).
Microbiological results of reduced bacterial growth by different silicone samples at different time points/after four hours of exposure.
| Sample | 1st Day | 30 Days | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFU/mL | Growth Reduction (%) | CFU/mL | Growth Reduction (%) | |
| PDMS | 2.64 × 107 | / | 5.32 × 107 | / |
| PDMSCN | 1.55 × 107 | 41.29 | 5.23 × 107 | 1.69 |
| PDMSCN-CoAM | 1.59 × 106 |
| 1.35 × 105 |
|
| PDMSPA1, CN | 3.59 × 107 | 0.00 | 1.32 × 108 | Bacteria growth stimulation |
| PDMSPA1, CN-CoAM | 1.11 × 107 | 57.95 | 1.03 × 107 | 64.80 |
| PDMSPA5, CN | 1.50 × 107 | 43.18 | 2.52 × 107 | 52.63 |
| PDMSPA5, CN-CoAM | 7.79 × 105 |
| 2.80 × 107 |
|
Microbiological results of reduced bacterial growth at different silicone samples surfaces after 1 month.
| Sample | Test after One Month from Coating Application | |
|---|---|---|
| CFU/mL | Growth Reduction (%) | |
| PDMS | 5.64 × 104 | / |
| PDMSCN | 4.18 × 104 | 25.89 |
| PDMSCN-CoAM | 3.92 × 103 |
|
| PDMSPA1, CN | 2.55 × 104 | 54.79 |
| PDMSPA1, CN-CoAM | 2.75 × 103 |
|
| PDMSPA5, CN | 3.30 × 105 | Bacteria growth stimulation |
| PDMSPA5, CN-CoAM | 1.93 × 103 |
|
Figure 4Time-dependent change in the active substance concentration.
Figure 5Time-dependent change in the cumulative released mass of the incorporated drug.
Figure 6Time-dependent change in the percentage of the released incorporated drug.