DongWon Yun1, JiSun Choi2. 1. College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea. 2. College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: jchoi14@khu.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition of person-centered care as an essential component of quality care, little is known about how person-centered care can be implemented in the provision of care services and how it is empirically related to outcomes in the rehabilitation settings. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent of implementation of the person-centered care in rehabilitation practices, as well as its effects on relevant outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycARTICLES, and Cochrane library) were searched for articles published between January 2000 and January 2018. METHODS: Based on the inclusion criteria, quantitative studies that examined person-centered rehabilitation interventions and relevant outcomes were included. Study quality assessment, data extraction, and synthesis were performed. RESULTS: For this systematic review, 17 eligible studies were included and most studies were rated as low-quality. The selected studies were varied concerning the use of the term person-centered care, research design, target population, sample size, setting, intervention, and outcome measures. The most examined interventions in this review were focused on goal setting and shared-decision making processes based on the client-centered approach. The implementation of those interventions varied considerably. Results showed mixed relationships between person-centered care and the outcomes examined in the studies although there was strong evidence regarding the positive effects of person-centered care on occupational performance and rehabilitation satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Person-centered care has been increasingly advocated in rehabilitation settings. However, we found that true person-centered care was not fully implemented in rehabilitation practices. Moreover, it appears that person-centered care could positively affect rehabilitation outcomes, such as significant improvements in functional performance and quality of life, however, evidence about these positive effects of person-centered care is not sufficient. More research with rigorous designs is needed.
BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition of person-centered care as an essential component of quality care, little is known about how person-centered care can be implemented in the provision of care services and how it is empirically related to outcomes in the rehabilitation settings. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent of implementation of the person-centered care in rehabilitation practices, as well as its effects on relevant outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycARTICLES, and Cochrane library) were searched for articles published between January 2000 and January 2018. METHODS: Based on the inclusion criteria, quantitative studies that examined person-centered rehabilitation interventions and relevant outcomes were included. Study quality assessment, data extraction, and synthesis were performed. RESULTS: For this systematic review, 17 eligible studies were included and most studies were rated as low-quality. The selected studies were varied concerning the use of the term person-centered care, research design, target population, sample size, setting, intervention, and outcome measures. The most examined interventions in this review were focused on goal setting and shared-decision making processes based on the client-centered approach. The implementation of those interventions varied considerably. Results showed mixed relationships between person-centered care and the outcomes examined in the studies although there was strong evidence regarding the positive effects of person-centered care on occupational performance and rehabilitation satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS:Person-centered care has been increasingly advocated in rehabilitation settings. However, we found that true person-centered care was not fully implemented in rehabilitation practices. Moreover, it appears that person-centered care could positively affect rehabilitation outcomes, such as significant improvements in functional performance and quality of life, however, evidence about these positive effects of person-centered care is not sufficient. More research with rigorous designs is needed.
Authors: Ida M H Borgen; Solveig L Hauger; Marit V Forslund; Ingerid Kleffelgård; Cathrine Brunborg; Nada Andelic; Unni Sveen; Helene L Søberg; Solrun Sigurdardottir; Cecilie Røe; Marianne Løvstad Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Marianne Sivertsen; Hanne De Jaegher; Ellen Christin Arntzen; Karl Bjørnar Alstadhaug; Britt Normann Journal: Physiother Res Int Date: 2022-03-20
Authors: Óscar Rodríguez-Nogueira; Jaume Morera Balaguer; Abel Nogueira López; Juan Roldán Merino; José-Martín Botella-Rico; Sonia Del Río-Medina; Antonio R Moreno Poyato Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ramona Backhaus; Linda J M Hoek; Erica de Vries; Jolanda C M van Haastregt; Jan P H Hamers; Hilde Verbeek Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Meh Larsson; L Nordeman; K Holmgren; A Grimby-Ekman; G Hensing; C Björkelund; S Bergman; A Ekhammar; M Dottori; S Bernhardsson Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 2.362