Literature DB >> 30870586

A deep learning method for prediction of three-dimensional dose distribution of helical tomotherapy.

Zhiqiang Liu1, Jiawei Fan2,3, Minghui Li1, Hui Yan1, Zhihui Hu1, Peng Huang1, Yuan Tian1, Junjie Miao1, Jianrong Dai1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning method for prediction of three-dimensional (3D) voxel-by-voxel dose distributions of helical tomotherapy (HT).
METHODS: Using previously treated HT plans as training data, a deep learning model named U-ResNet-D was trained to predict a 3D dose distribution. First, the contoured structures and dose volumes were converted from plan database to 3D matrix with a program based on a developed visualization toolkit (VTK), then transferred to U-ResNet-D for correlating anatomical features and dose distributions at voxel-level. One hundred and ninety nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients treated by HT with multiple planning target volumes (PTVs) in different prescription patterns were studied. The model was typically trained from scratch with weights randomly initialized rather than using transfer-learning method, and used to predict new patient's 3D dose distributions. The predictive accuracy was evaluated with three methods: (a) The dose difference at the position r, δ(r, r) = Dc (r) - Dp (r), was calculated for each voxel. The mean (μδ(r,r) ) and standard deviation (σδ(r,r) ) of δ(r, r) were calculated to assess the prediction bias and precision; (b) The mean absolute differences of dosimetric indexes (DIs) including maximum and mean dose, homogeneity index, conformity index, and dose spillage for PTVs and organ at risks (OARs) were calculated and statistically analyzed with the paired-samples t test; (c) Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) between predicted and clinical isodose volumes were calculated.
RESULTS: The U-ResNet-D model predicted 3D dose distribution accurately. For twenty tested patients, the prediction bias ranged from -2.0% to 2.3% and prediction error varied from 1.5% to 4.5% (relative to prescription) for 3D dose differences. The mean absolute dose differences for PTVs and OARs are within 2.0% and 4.2%, and nearly all the DIs for PTVs and OARs had no significant differences. The averaged DSC ranged from 0.95 to 1 for different isodose volumes.
CONCLUSIONS: The study developed a new deep learning method for 3D voxel-by-voxel dose prediction, and shown to be able to produce accurately dose predictions for nasopharyngeal patients treated by HT. The predicted 3D dose map can be useful for improving radiotherapy planning design, ensuring plan quality and consistency, making clinical technique comparison, and guiding automatic treatment planning.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D dose prediction; deep learning; helical tomotherapy; nasopharyngeal cancers

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30870586     DOI: 10.1002/mp.13490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence in radiotherapy: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Giulio Francolini; Isacco Desideri; Giulia Stocchi; Viola Salvestrini; Lucia Pia Ciccone; Pietro Garlatti; Mauro Loi; Lorenzo Livi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Utilizing pre-determined beam orientation information in dose prediction by 3D fully-connected network for intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hui Yan; Shoulin Liu; Jingjing Zhang; Jianfei Liu; Teng Li
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-12

4.  Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Yabo Fu; Hao Zhang; Eric D Morris; Carri K Glide-Hurst; Suraj Pai; Alberto Traverso; Leonard Wee; Ibrahim Hadzic; Per-Ivar Lønne; Chenyang Shen; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-24

5.  Predicting 3D dose distribution with scale attention network for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Saba Adabi; Tzu-Chi Tsen; Yading Yuan
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 6.  A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Ching-Wei Wang; Muhammad-Adil Khalil; Nabila Puspita Firdi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

7.  Modeling physician's preference in treatment plan approval of stereotactic body radiation therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yin Gao; Chenyang Shen; Yesenia Gonzalez; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.174

8.  CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using deep-attention cycleGAN for pancreatic adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yingzi Liu; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Yabo Fu; Xiangyang Tang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Pretesh Patel; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Clinical Implementation of Automated Treatment Planning for Rectum Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Using Voxel-Based Dose Prediction and Post-Optimization Strategies.

Authors:  Yang Zhong; Lei Yu; Jun Zhao; Yingtao Fang; Yanju Yang; Zhiqiang Wu; Jiazhou Wang; Weigang Hu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  A method of using deep learning to predict three-dimensional dose distributions for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jieping Zhou; Zhao Peng; Yuchen Song; Yankui Chang; Xi Pei; Liusi Sheng; X George Xu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.